Specific heat is a measure of how much heat energy must be added to one gram of a substance to cause a one degree Celsius increase in temperature. The formula for this relationship is:
Q= c*m* AT
• Q is the amount of heat added to the substance;
• c is the specific heat of the substance;
• m is the mass of the substance; and
• AT is the change in temperature of the substance.
A substance has a mass of 10 grams. This substance has 45 joules of heat added to it, and the change in temperature is 5 degrees. What is the specific heat of the substance? J/gK
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 0.9
To determine the specific heat, we use the formula \( c = \frac{Q}{m \Delta T} \), where \( Q \) is the heat added (45 J), \( m \) is the mass (10 g), and \( \Delta T \) is the temperature change (5 °C). Plugging in the values: \( c = \frac{45 \, \text{J}}{10 \, \text{g} \times 5 \, \text{°C}} = 0.9 \, \text{J/g°C} \). Other options may arise from calculation errors, such as misapplying the formula or using incorrect units. For instance, if one mistakenly divides by a different temperature change or mass, it would yield incorrect specific heat values. Thus, 0.9 J/gK accurately reflects the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature change for this substance.
To determine the specific heat, we use the formula \( c = \frac{Q}{m \Delta T} \), where \( Q \) is the heat added (45 J), \( m \) is the mass (10 g), and \( \Delta T \) is the temperature change (5 °C). Plugging in the values: \( c = \frac{45 \, \text{J}}{10 \, \text{g} \times 5 \, \text{°C}} = 0.9 \, \text{J/g°C} \). Other options may arise from calculation errors, such as misapplying the formula or using incorrect units. For instance, if one mistakenly divides by a different temperature change or mass, it would yield incorrect specific heat values. Thus, 0.9 J/gK accurately reflects the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature change for this substance.
Other Related Questions
A scientist studying solubility increased the temperature of a constant volume of water and measured the amount of sugar that dissolved into solution... Which of the following describes the relationship between the independent and dependent variables?
- A. As the amount of dissolved sugar increased, the temperature of the water decreased.
- B. As the water temperature increased, the amount of dissolved sugar increased.
- C. As the amount of dissolved sugar increased, the amount of water remained constant.
- D. As the water temperature increased, the amount of water decreased.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B accurately describes the relationship between the independent variable (temperature of the water) and the dependent variable (amount of dissolved sugar). As temperature rises, solubility typically increases, allowing more sugar to dissolve. Option A incorrectly suggests an inverse relationship; higher temperatures do not cause the amount of dissolved sugar to decrease. Option C, while true, does not address the relationship between the two variables in question. Option D incorrectly implies that increasing temperature leads to a decrease in water volume, which is not relevant in this context.
Option B accurately describes the relationship between the independent variable (temperature of the water) and the dependent variable (amount of dissolved sugar). As temperature rises, solubility typically increases, allowing more sugar to dissolve. Option A incorrectly suggests an inverse relationship; higher temperatures do not cause the amount of dissolved sugar to decrease. Option C, while true, does not address the relationship between the two variables in question. Option D incorrectly implies that increasing temperature leads to a decrease in water volume, which is not relevant in this context.
A 60W light bulb used .48 kilowatt hours of electricity. How long was the light bulb on?
- A. 0.48 hours
- B. 28.8 hours
- C. 0.125 hours
- D. 8 hours
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how long the 60W light bulb was on, we first convert the energy used from kilowatt hours to watt hours: 0.48 kWh equals 480 watt hours. Using the formula: time (hours) = energy (watt hours) / power (watts), we calculate: 480 watt hours / 60 watts = 8 hours. Option A (0.48 hours) underestimates the time significantly. Option B (28.8 hours) incorrectly suggests the bulb was on much longer than the energy consumed allows. Option C (0.125 hours) miscalculates by assuming a much higher power consumption. Only option D accurately reflects the time the bulb was on based on the energy used.
To determine how long the 60W light bulb was on, we first convert the energy used from kilowatt hours to watt hours: 0.48 kWh equals 480 watt hours. Using the formula: time (hours) = energy (watt hours) / power (watts), we calculate: 480 watt hours / 60 watts = 8 hours. Option A (0.48 hours) underestimates the time significantly. Option B (28.8 hours) incorrectly suggests the bulb was on much longer than the energy consumed allows. Option C (0.125 hours) miscalculates by assuming a much higher power consumption. Only option D accurately reflects the time the bulb was on based on the energy used.
What is the relationship between the kinetic energy of the feather and of the hammer just before they hit the surface of the Moon?
- A. The hammer has more kinetic energy than the feather because it has a greater mass.
- B. Both objects have the same kinetic energy because they fell with the same velocity.
- C. The hammer has more kinetic energy than the feather because it will accelerate faster than the feather.
- D. Both objects have the same kinetic energy because gravity pulls on both objects equally.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The hammer possesses more kinetic energy than the feather due to its greater mass, as kinetic energy is calculated using the formula KE = 0.5 * mass * velocity². While both objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum, their velocities are equal, but the hammer’s larger mass results in higher kinetic energy. Option B is incorrect because, although they have the same velocity, kinetic energy also depends on mass. Option C misrepresents the situation; both objects accelerate at the same rate in a vacuum. Option D is misleading; while gravity affects both equally, it does not determine kinetic energy, which also requires consideration of mass.
The hammer possesses more kinetic energy than the feather due to its greater mass, as kinetic energy is calculated using the formula KE = 0.5 * mass * velocity². While both objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum, their velocities are equal, but the hammer’s larger mass results in higher kinetic energy. Option B is incorrect because, although they have the same velocity, kinetic energy also depends on mass. Option C misrepresents the situation; both objects accelerate at the same rate in a vacuum. Option D is misleading; while gravity affects both equally, it does not determine kinetic energy, which also requires consideration of mass.
Why is the conclusion about gene variation among cheetahs from Sommer's research more valid than the conclusion from O'Brien's research?
- A. Sommer's research was conducted more recently than O'Brien's
- B. Sommer's research used a different population of cheetahs than O'Brien's
- C. Sommer's conclusion is about disease response, while O'Brien's is about skin grafts.
- D. Sommer's conclusion is based on examining the genes, while O'Brien's conclusion is based on acceptance of a skin graft.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.