Frederick Winslow Taylor
The following is an obituary from March 21, 1915, announcing the death of Frederick Winslow Taylor.
1 PHILADELPHIA, March 21: Frederick Winslow Tayler, originator of the modem scientific management movement, died here today from pneumonia. He was 59 years old, and was a former President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Among his numerous inventions and discoveries was the Taylor-White process of treating modem high-speed took. He was the author of articles on scientific efficiency. and installed his system in many large industrial establishments.
2 The writings and lectures of Frederic Winslow Taylor formed the basis of the recent reorganization of methods of handing labor in many of the largest industries in the country. The articles of Mr. Taylor on "Scientific Management" in 1911 had a good deal to do with giving its new, special meaning to the word "efficiency" and making it the watchword which it has become since that time.
3 One of his leading doctrines which has made a deep impression on business and industry in this country since that time is that a man who proves incompetent at one jab should be fitted in where he can give good service, instead of being discharged. His life work was chiefly devoted to the simplification of industrial processes to reduce costs and increase Outputs.
4 Mr. Taylor was born at Germantown, Philadelphia, on March 20, 1856, and was graduated from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1883. He won the doubles championship of the United States at tennis at Newport in 1881. He entered the employ of the Midvale Steel Company at Philadelphia in 1878 and was successively gang boss, assistant foreman, foreman of the machine shop, master mechanic, chief draughtsman, and chief engineer.
5 In 1889 he began his special work of re-organizing the management of
Based on the obituary, 'scientific management' meant
- A. doing work in a more productive manner.
- B. creating better tools for the workplace.
- C. getting rid of unskilled workers.
- D. hiring more inventive workers.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Scientific management focuses on improving efficiency and productivity in the workplace by analyzing and optimizing work processes. Option A captures this essence, emphasizing a more productive approach to tasks. Option B, while relevant, is too narrow as scientific management encompasses more than just tool creation; it involves systematic study of workflows. Option C misinterprets the philosophy, which does not advocate for eliminating unskilled workers but rather seeks to enhance overall productivity through better management techniques. Option D suggests hiring more inventive workers, which is not a core principle of scientific management; it prioritizes process optimization over workforce creativity.
Scientific management focuses on improving efficiency and productivity in the workplace by analyzing and optimizing work processes. Option A captures this essence, emphasizing a more productive approach to tasks. Option B, while relevant, is too narrow as scientific management encompasses more than just tool creation; it involves systematic study of workflows. Option C misinterprets the philosophy, which does not advocate for eliminating unskilled workers but rather seeks to enhance overall productivity through better management techniques. Option D suggests hiring more inventive workers, which is not a core principle of scientific management; it prioritizes process optimization over workforce creativity.
Other Related Questions
What is this labor market's equilibrium wage rate?
- A. $4 per hour
- B. $8 per hour
- C. $12 per hour
- D. $16 per hour
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
In a labor market, the equilibrium wage rate occurs where the quantity of labor supplied equals the quantity of labor demanded. Option C, $12 per hour, represents this balance, reflecting conditions where employers are willing to hire the same number of workers that job seekers are willing to accept. Option A, $4 per hour, is too low, leading to a surplus of labor as more workers seek jobs than employers are willing to hire. Option B, $8 per hour, may still create an imbalance, as it might not attract enough skilled workers. Option D, $16 per hour, is likely too high, resulting in a labor shortage as fewer employers can afford to pay that rate. Thus, $12 per hour is the optimal equilibrium wage.
In a labor market, the equilibrium wage rate occurs where the quantity of labor supplied equals the quantity of labor demanded. Option C, $12 per hour, represents this balance, reflecting conditions where employers are willing to hire the same number of workers that job seekers are willing to accept. Option A, $4 per hour, is too low, leading to a surplus of labor as more workers seek jobs than employers are willing to hire. Option B, $8 per hour, may still create an imbalance, as it might not attract enough skilled workers. Option D, $16 per hour, is likely too high, resulting in a labor shortage as fewer employers can afford to pay that rate. Thus, $12 per hour is the optimal equilibrium wage.
A drought strikes Toland and decreases the amount of fish caught from 8 units to 2 units. How will this change affect trade negotiations for the following year?
- A. The countries should maintain the existing agreement.
- B. Both countries should produce both goods.
- C. Toland should specialize in the production of timber.
- D. Toland should specialize in the production of fish.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
Why were most of the passengers denied permission to enter Cuba?
- A. Cuba had already accepted all the refugees it could for that year.
- B. Cuba and Germany did not have diplomatic relations at that time.
- C. Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally.
- D. It was feared that admitting them would create tension with Germany.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
Which of these statements best describes the difference between Commonwealth v. Hunt and Muller v. Oregon?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to education cases, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to issues of labor relations.
- B. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to labor issues, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to free speech issues.
- C. Both cases deal with labor issues; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon gives businesses the right to challenge unions' demands.
- D. Both cases deal with labor cases; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon supports state regulation of working hours for women.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.