In 1908, a huge explosion known as the Tunguska Event flattened trees for miles across a remote area of Russia. Scientists now think an asteroid or a comet entered Earth's atmosphere, causing the explosion. Ice core samples from an ice sheet in Greenland reveal signs of this enormous explosion: deposits of ammonia equal to 5 micrograms per square meter. But how exactly did these telltale molecules form?
• Hypothesis 1: The Tunguska explosion started forest fires, known to produce ammonia. Data indicates that such fires would have deposited an amount of ammonia over the Northern Hemisphere equaling 0.1 micrograms per square meter.
• Hypothesis 2: Up to 1% of the object's mass might have been ammonia, and this ammonia might have spread over the Northern Hemisphere. Approximately 0.00005 micrograms of ammonia per square meter are predicted by this hypothesis.
• Hypothesis 3: Since many compounds form in the presence of high heat, the ammonia could
have been produced as the falling object heated the atmosphere. However, heat alone is not
sufficient to cause the formation of ammonia.
• Hypothesis 4: As it passed through the atmosphere, the object pushed air in front of it at high pressure. Nitrogen and hydrogen combine to form ammonia under similar pressure. Considering the amount of hydrogen expected in a comet and the available nitrogen in Earth's atmosphere, approximately 5 micrograms of ammonia per square meter would have been deposited under this hypothesis.
best explains the ammonia deposits found in ice core samples from the time of the Tunguska Event. The evidence that best supports the validity of this hypothesis is the-
- A. Hypothesis 2
- B. heat produced by fast-moving objects in the atmosphere
- C. Hypothesis 1
- D. match between measured and predicted amounts of ammonia
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,D
The ammonia deposits found in ice core samples from the time of the Tunguska Event suggest a significant environmental impact. Hypothesis 2 (Option A) likely proposes a link between the event and the ammonia presence, making it relevant for explaining the deposits. Option B, which discusses heat from fast-moving objects, does not directly address ammonia production or accumulation. Hypothesis 1 (Option C) may not provide sufficient evidence or detail to support the ammonia findings. Option D highlights the alignment between measured and predicted ammonia levels, reinforcing the validity of Hypothesis 2 as it connects empirical data with theoretical expectations.
The ammonia deposits found in ice core samples from the time of the Tunguska Event suggest a significant environmental impact. Hypothesis 2 (Option A) likely proposes a link between the event and the ammonia presence, making it relevant for explaining the deposits. Option B, which discusses heat from fast-moving objects, does not directly address ammonia production or accumulation. Hypothesis 1 (Option C) may not provide sufficient evidence or detail to support the ammonia findings. Option D highlights the alignment between measured and predicted ammonia levels, reinforcing the validity of Hypothesis 2 as it connects empirical data with theoretical expectations.
Other Related Questions
Which statement describes one feature of the Rutherford-Bohr atom model that the Thomson model does not share?
- A. The Rutherford-Bohr model identifies different elements by the numbers of particles present.
- B. The Rutherford-Bohr model maintains the observed neutral charge of atoms.
- C. The Rutherford-Bohr model correctly describes the types of particles in the atom.
- D. The Rutherford-Bohr model restricts the positive charge of the atom to the nucleus.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The Rutherford-Bohr model uniquely restricts the atom's positive charge to the nucleus, a significant advancement over the Thomson model, which depicts a diffuse positive charge throughout the atom. Option A is incorrect as both models can identify elements based on particle numbers, but the Rutherford-Bohr model adds more detail about electron arrangements. Option B is misleading; both models account for atomic neutrality, but the Rutherford-Bohr model provides a clearer structure. Option C is also inaccurate; while the Rutherford-Bohr model describes particles more accurately, it does not fundamentally change the types of particles present compared to Thomson's model.
The Rutherford-Bohr model uniquely restricts the atom's positive charge to the nucleus, a significant advancement over the Thomson model, which depicts a diffuse positive charge throughout the atom. Option A is incorrect as both models can identify elements based on particle numbers, but the Rutherford-Bohr model adds more detail about electron arrangements. Option B is misleading; both models account for atomic neutrality, but the Rutherford-Bohr model provides a clearer structure. Option C is also inaccurate; while the Rutherford-Bohr model describes particles more accurately, it does not fundamentally change the types of particles present compared to Thomson's model.
Which hypothesis was Dilger testing in his experiment?
- A. If hybrid offspring have a mixture of behaviors, then the species are within the same genus.
- B. If a hybrid offspring carries nesting material in its beak, then it is more closely related to modern lovebirds.
- C. If behavior in lovebirds is genetic, then a hybrid offspring will display a mixture of behaviors.
- D. If lovebird species can interbreed, then a hybrid offspring will have a mixture of behaviors.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Dilger aimed to investigate the genetic basis of behavior in lovebirds, specifically focusing on whether hybrid offspring exhibit a blend of behaviors from their parent species. Option C accurately reflects this hypothesis, linking genetic inheritance to behavioral traits in hybrids. Option A incorrectly connects hybrid behavior to taxonomic classification, which is not the primary focus of Dilger’s study. Option B suggests a direct relationship between nesting material behavior and modern lovebirds, overlooking the broader genetic implications. Option D, while related to interbreeding, does not emphasize the genetic aspect of behavior, which is central to Dilger's hypothesis.
Dilger aimed to investigate the genetic basis of behavior in lovebirds, specifically focusing on whether hybrid offspring exhibit a blend of behaviors from their parent species. Option C accurately reflects this hypothesis, linking genetic inheritance to behavioral traits in hybrids. Option A incorrectly connects hybrid behavior to taxonomic classification, which is not the primary focus of Dilger’s study. Option B suggests a direct relationship between nesting material behavior and modern lovebirds, overlooking the broader genetic implications. Option D, while related to interbreeding, does not emphasize the genetic aspect of behavior, which is central to Dilger's hypothesis.
Which hypothesis is suitable for this investigation?
- A. Body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate depend on the health of the subject.
- B. Many of the body's systems respond to exercise.
- C. Body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate increase with exercise.
- D. Subjects at rest have better health than subjects that exercise.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C effectively addresses the investigation by predicting a specific relationship: that body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate will increase with exercise. This hypothesis is testable and directly relates to physiological responses during physical activity. Option A is too broad, as it suggests a general relationship between health and various physiological metrics without focusing on exercise. Option B, while relevant, lacks specificity regarding the measurable changes in body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate. Option D presents a misleading comparison, as it contradicts established knowledge about the benefits of exercise for health.
Option C effectively addresses the investigation by predicting a specific relationship: that body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate will increase with exercise. This hypothesis is testable and directly relates to physiological responses during physical activity. Option A is too broad, as it suggests a general relationship between health and various physiological metrics without focusing on exercise. Option B, while relevant, lacks specificity regarding the measurable changes in body temperature, breathing rate, and heart rate. Option D presents a misleading comparison, as it contradicts established knowledge about the benefits of exercise for health.
A substance has a mass of 10 grams. This substance has 45 joules of heat added to it, and the change in temperature is 5 degrees. What is the specific heat of the substance? J/gK
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 0.9
To determine the specific heat, we use the formula \( c = \frac{Q}{m \Delta T} \), where \( Q \) is the heat added (45 J), \( m \) is the mass (10 g), and \( \Delta T \) is the temperature change (5 °C). Plugging in the values: \( c = \frac{45 \, \text{J}}{10 \, \text{g} \times 5 \, \text{°C}} = 0.9 \, \text{J/g°C} \). Other options may arise from calculation errors, such as misapplying the formula or using incorrect units. For instance, if one mistakenly divides by a different temperature change or mass, it would yield incorrect specific heat values. Thus, 0.9 J/gK accurately reflects the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature change for this substance.
To determine the specific heat, we use the formula \( c = \frac{Q}{m \Delta T} \), where \( Q \) is the heat added (45 J), \( m \) is the mass (10 g), and \( \Delta T \) is the temperature change (5 °C). Plugging in the values: \( c = \frac{45 \, \text{J}}{10 \, \text{g} \times 5 \, \text{°C}} = 0.9 \, \text{J/g°C} \). Other options may arise from calculation errors, such as misapplying the formula or using incorrect units. For instance, if one mistakenly divides by a different temperature change or mass, it would yield incorrect specific heat values. Thus, 0.9 J/gK accurately reflects the relationship between heat, mass, and temperature change for this substance.