Read the passage below and then choose the best answer to each question. Answer the questions on the basis of wha the passage.
Passage
In 1968, a high-school student in Japan discovered the fossilized bones of a plesiosaur, a giant m reptile that lived some 85 million years ago. Shark teeth stuck in the plesiosaur's bones, and othe tooth fossils found nearby, suggest that this plesiosaur was attacked by a group of what were ess miniature great white sharks. The plesiosaur discovery reveals that ancient sharks, which were th have eaten only fish, may also have attacked reptiles. After the discovery, researcher Kenshu Shi said, "It is still possible they could've eaten fish, but at least this fossil shows the plesiosaur was c food items."
The author of the passage does which of the following?
- A. Relates a personal anecdote
- B. Provides statistical data
- C. Quotes a named authority
- D. Challenges an official view
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The author quotes a named authority to lend credibility to their argument, enhancing the passage's persuasive impact. This approach allows the reader to see the author's position supported by established expertise. Option A is incorrect as there is no personal anecdote shared; the focus remains on authoritative sources. Option B is not applicable since the passage lacks statistical data, relying instead on qualitative support. Option D is also wrong; the author does not challenge an official view but rather reinforces their argument through the cited authority, maintaining a respectful stance towards existing perspectives.
The author quotes a named authority to lend credibility to their argument, enhancing the passage's persuasive impact. This approach allows the reader to see the author's position supported by established expertise. Option A is incorrect as there is no personal anecdote shared; the focus remains on authoritative sources. Option B is not applicable since the passage lacks statistical data, relying instead on qualitative support. Option D is also wrong; the author does not challenge an official view but rather reinforces their argument through the cited authority, maintaining a respectful stance towards existing perspectives.
Other Related Questions
The author of Passage 1 would probably say that the claims in the last sentence of Passage 2 ("Someday... notice") are
- A. disappointing and inaccurate
- B. stimulating and insightful
- C. optimistic but vague
- D. alarming but truthful
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The claims in the last sentence of Passage 2 are likely viewed as disappointing and inaccurate because they may contradict the author's perspective in Passage 1, which emphasizes realism over idealism. Option B, "stimulating and insightful," misinterprets the author's critical stance; the claims are not presented as thought-provoking. Option C, "optimistic but vague," overlooks the author's likely skepticism towards vague claims that lack concrete support. Option D, "alarming but truthful," fails to capture the author's likely rejection of the claims as factual, indicating a more critical viewpoint.
The claims in the last sentence of Passage 2 are likely viewed as disappointing and inaccurate because they may contradict the author's perspective in Passage 1, which emphasizes realism over idealism. Option B, "stimulating and insightful," misinterprets the author's critical stance; the claims are not presented as thought-provoking. Option C, "optimistic but vague," overlooks the author's likely skepticism towards vague claims that lack concrete support. Option D, "alarming but truthful," fails to capture the author's likely rejection of the claims as factual, indicating a more critical viewpoint.
The author of Passage 2 would most likely say that the opinion held by the "people" mentioned in the third sentence of Passage 1 ("Some people have declared") is
- A. accurate
- B. unsupported
- C. misguided
- D. amusing
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The opinion held by the "people" in Passage 1 is deemed accurate, as the author of Passage 2 likely aligns with the sentiment expressed. This suggests a shared understanding or validation of the viewpoint. Option B, "unsupported," is incorrect because the author likely provides evidence or reasoning that bolsters the opinion. Option C, "misguided," does not align with the author's perspective, which would not characterize the opinion as erroneous. Option D, "amusing," is inappropriate as it trivializes the opinion rather than acknowledging its validity.
The opinion held by the "people" in Passage 1 is deemed accurate, as the author of Passage 2 likely aligns with the sentiment expressed. This suggests a shared understanding or validation of the viewpoint. Option B, "unsupported," is incorrect because the author likely provides evidence or reasoning that bolsters the opinion. Option C, "misguided," does not align with the author's perspective, which would not characterize the opinion as erroneous. Option D, "amusing," is inappropriate as it trivializes the opinion rather than acknowledging its validity.
He was an outstanding public speaker he was also a talented writer.
- A. He was an outstanding public speaker
- B. He was an outstanding public speaker,
- C. An outstanding public speaker,
- D. An outstanding public speaker and
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B is the only choice that correctly uses a comma to connect two independent clauses. The sentence requires a comma before the conjunction "he" to clarify that two distinct ideas are being presented. Option A lacks the necessary punctuation, making it an incomplete thought. Option C is a fragment, as it does not form a complete sentence and lacks a verb. Option D is also a fragment; it starts with a noun phrase but does not complete the thought, leaving the reader without a full understanding of the statement. Proper punctuation is essential for clarity and coherence in writing.
Option B is the only choice that correctly uses a comma to connect two independent clauses. The sentence requires a comma before the conjunction "he" to clarify that two distinct ideas are being presented. Option A lacks the necessary punctuation, making it an incomplete thought. Option C is a fragment, as it does not form a complete sentence and lacks a verb. Option D is also a fragment; it starts with a noun phrase but does not complete the thought, leaving the reader without a full understanding of the statement. Proper punctuation is essential for clarity and coherence in writing.
Beth was certain that tickets to the concert would sell quickly she ordered them online as soon the became available.
- A. quickly, she
- B. quickly, therefore
- C. quickly, so she
- D. quickly, then
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C, "quickly, so she," effectively connects Beth's belief about the tickets selling fast with her action of ordering them. The phrase "so she" indicates a cause-and-effect relationship, clarifying that her certainty motivated her decision. Option A, "quickly, she," lacks a clear connection between her belief and action, making the sentence feel incomplete. Option B, "quickly, therefore," is overly formal for this context and implies a logical conclusion rather than a direct action stemming from her belief. Option D, "quickly, then," suggests a sequence but does not imply causation, weakening the relationship between her certainty and her decision.
Option C, "quickly, so she," effectively connects Beth's belief about the tickets selling fast with her action of ordering them. The phrase "so she" indicates a cause-and-effect relationship, clarifying that her certainty motivated her decision. Option A, "quickly, she," lacks a clear connection between her belief and action, making the sentence feel incomplete. Option B, "quickly, therefore," is overly formal for this context and implies a logical conclusion rather than a direct action stemming from her belief. Option D, "quickly, then," suggests a sequence but does not imply causation, weakening the relationship between her certainty and her decision.