Which of the following inequalities is true?
- A. 0.7 < 0.1 < 0.11 < 0.101
- B. 0.1 < 0.7 < 0.101 < 0.11
- C. 0.1 < 0.7 < 0.11 < 0.101
- D. 0.1 < 0.101 < 0.11 < 0.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D accurately represents the correct order of the numbers. When comparing the values, 0.1 is the smallest, followed by 0.101, then 0.11, and finally 0.7, which is the largest. Option A is incorrect as it mistakenly places 0.7 as less than both 0.1 and 0.11, which is not true. Option B incorrectly suggests that 0.101 is less than 0.11, which is also inaccurate. Option C places 0.11 before 0.101, misrepresenting their actual values. Thus, D is the only option that correctly orders the numbers from smallest to largest.
Option D accurately represents the correct order of the numbers. When comparing the values, 0.1 is the smallest, followed by 0.101, then 0.11, and finally 0.7, which is the largest. Option A is incorrect as it mistakenly places 0.7 as less than both 0.1 and 0.11, which is not true. Option B incorrectly suggests that 0.101 is less than 0.11, which is also inaccurate. Option C places 0.11 before 0.101, misrepresenting their actual values. Thus, D is the only option that correctly orders the numbers from smallest to largest.
Other Related Questions
Alexia, Bob, and Comelia recorded the number of pages of books they read last month. Alexia read 135 pages, Bob read 26 pages less than Alexia, and Comelia read 3 and one-half times more pages than Alexia and Bob combined. Which of the following represents the total number of pages that Alexia, Bob, and Comelia read last month?
- A. 3.5(135 + 26)
- B. 3.5[2(135) - 26]
- C. 4.5[2(135) - 26]
- D. 4.5[2(135) + 26]
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of pages read, first calculate Bob's pages: he read 135 - 26 = 109 pages. The combined pages of Alexia and Bob is 135 + 109 = 244 pages. Comelia read 3.5 times this total, resulting in 3.5 × 244. Option A incorrectly uses 135 + 26, which does not account for Bob's actual pages read. Option B mistakenly uses a subtraction instead of addition for the combined total. Option D incorrectly adds Bob's pages instead of using the correct combined total for Comelia's calculation. Thus, C accurately represents the total with 3.5(244), leading to the correct final total.
To determine the total number of pages read, first calculate Bob's pages: he read 135 - 26 = 109 pages. The combined pages of Alexia and Bob is 135 + 109 = 244 pages. Comelia read 3.5 times this total, resulting in 3.5 × 244. Option A incorrectly uses 135 + 26, which does not account for Bob's actual pages read. Option B mistakenly uses a subtraction instead of addition for the combined total. Option D incorrectly adds Bob's pages instead of using the correct combined total for Comelia's calculation. Thus, C accurately represents the total with 3.5(244), leading to the correct final total.
165 is what percent of 150?
- A. 95%
- B. 110%
- C. 111%
- D. 115%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) underestimates the value, as it suggests 165 is less than 150. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the percentage, as it does not accurately reflect the calculation. Option D (115%) also exaggerates the value, implying that 165 exceeds 150 by a larger margin than it actually does. Therefore, 110% is the precise representation of 165 in relation to 150.
To find what percent 165 is of 150, divide 165 by 150 and then multiply by 100. This calculation yields 110%, indicating that 165 is 110% of 150. Option A (95%) underestimates the value, as it suggests 165 is less than 150. Option C (111%) slightly overestimates the percentage, as it does not accurately reflect the calculation. Option D (115%) also exaggerates the value, implying that 165 exceeds 150 by a larger margin than it actually does. Therefore, 110% is the precise representation of 165 in relation to 150.
6[4 + 2(1 - 3)] =
- B. 20
- C. 24
- D. 48
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the expression 6[4 + 2(1 - 3)], begin by simplifying inside the brackets. The calculation within the parentheses, 1 - 3, equals -2. Next, multiply by 2 to get -4. Now, the expression inside the brackets is 4 - 4, which simplifies to 0. Finally, multiplying 6 by 0 results in 0. Option B (20), C (24), and D (48) arise from miscalculations, such as incorrectly handling the order of operations or not simplifying the expression fully. None of these options account for the zero outcome from the calculations.
To solve the expression 6[4 + 2(1 - 3)], begin by simplifying inside the brackets. The calculation within the parentheses, 1 - 3, equals -2. Next, multiply by 2 to get -4. Now, the expression inside the brackets is 4 - 4, which simplifies to 0. Finally, multiplying 6 by 0 results in 0. Option B (20), C (24), and D (48) arise from miscalculations, such as incorrectly handling the order of operations or not simplifying the expression fully. None of these options account for the zero outcome from the calculations.
7.50 ÷ 0.125 =
- A. 60
- B. 6
- C. 0.6
- D. 1/6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.