Which of the following words is best identified as a Tier 1 or everyday word?
- A. Shape
- B. Ecosystem
- C. Context
- D. Continent
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Tier 1 words are basic vocabulary that most people use in everyday conversation. "Shape" fits this definition as it refers to a common concept easily understood by all age groups. In contrast, "Ecosystem" (B) is a Tier 3 word often used in specific scientific contexts, making it less familiar to the general population. "Context" (C) is somewhat more common but still leans towards academic language, often requiring deeper comprehension. "Continent" (D) is a geographical term that, while known, is not used as frequently in daily interactions. Thus, "Shape" stands out as the most accessible everyday term.
Tier 1 words are basic vocabulary that most people use in everyday conversation. "Shape" fits this definition as it refers to a common concept easily understood by all age groups. In contrast, "Ecosystem" (B) is a Tier 3 word often used in specific scientific contexts, making it less familiar to the general population. "Context" (C) is somewhat more common but still leans towards academic language, often requiring deeper comprehension. "Continent" (D) is a geographical term that, while known, is not used as frequently in daily interactions. Thus, "Shape" stands out as the most accessible everyday term.
Other Related Questions
Which of the following most effectively combines the statements above into a single coherent and grammatically correct sentence?
- A. Much of the Great Wall of China, which is actually a network of walls and towers, was built in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
- B. The Great Wall of China, this is actually a network of walls and towers, much of it is built in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
- C. Much of the Great Wall of China, building in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and it is actually a network of walls and towers.
- D. Actually a network of walls and towers, they built much of the Great Wall of China in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively combines the statements into a coherent sentence by using a relative clause ("which is actually a network of walls and towers") to provide additional information about the Great Wall of China without disrupting the main thought. Option B incorrectly uses a comma splice, creating two independent clauses that are improperly joined. Option C introduces a participial phrase that makes the sentence awkward and unclear, failing to maintain grammatical structure. Option D starts with a fragment, lacking a clear subject, and misattributes the building of the wall, leading to confusion about who built it.
Option A effectively combines the statements into a coherent sentence by using a relative clause ("which is actually a network of walls and towers") to provide additional information about the Great Wall of China without disrupting the main thought. Option B incorrectly uses a comma splice, creating two independent clauses that are improperly joined. Option C introduces a participial phrase that makes the sentence awkward and unclear, failing to maintain grammatical structure. Option D starts with a fragment, lacking a clear subject, and misattributes the building of the wall, leading to confusion about who built it.
A teacher can help facilitate the development of students' writing by
- A. carefully selecting books to share with students
- B. using interactive attendance charts
- C. accepting all attempts at writing as valid
- D. introducing books with rhyming text
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Selecting books to share with students is vital as it exposes them to diverse writing styles, vocabulary, and ideas, fostering inspiration and improving their own writing skills. Using interactive attendance charts (B) may engage students, but it does not directly contribute to writing development. Accepting all attempts at writing as valid (C) can encourage risk-taking, but it may also hinder constructive feedback necessary for improvement. Introducing books with rhyming text (D) can be beneficial for early literacy but is too narrow a focus to support overall writing development effectively.
Selecting books to share with students is vital as it exposes them to diverse writing styles, vocabulary, and ideas, fostering inspiration and improving their own writing skills. Using interactive attendance charts (B) may engage students, but it does not directly contribute to writing development. Accepting all attempts at writing as valid (C) can encourage risk-taking, but it may also hinder constructive feedback necessary for improvement. Introducing books with rhyming text (D) can be beneficial for early literacy but is too narrow a focus to support overall writing development effectively.
The following is an advertising slogan for a company that makes home security systems. "Are you secure enough to leave home?" The slogan makes use of which of the following techniques often used in advertising to attract the reader's attention?
- A. Substituting slang for more formal expression
- B. Making an unsubstantiated claim appealing to a sense of individuality
- C. Highlighting a benefit by using an exclamatory sentence
- D. Employing wordplay based on the use of double meanings
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The slogan "Are you secure enough to leave home?" employs wordplay through its use of double meanings, effectively engaging the reader. It prompts reflection on personal security while also suggesting a deeper emotional connection to safety and freedom. Option A is incorrect as the slogan does not use slang; it maintains a formal tone. Option B misrepresents the slogan's intent; it does not make an unsubstantiated claim but rather poses a thought-provoking question. Option C is also not applicable, as the slogan is not exclamatory and does not highlight a benefit in that manner. Thus, option D accurately captures the cleverness of the slogan's wording.
The slogan "Are you secure enough to leave home?" employs wordplay through its use of double meanings, effectively engaging the reader. It prompts reflection on personal security while also suggesting a deeper emotional connection to safety and freedom. Option A is incorrect as the slogan does not use slang; it maintains a formal tone. Option B misrepresents the slogan's intent; it does not make an unsubstantiated claim but rather poses a thought-provoking question. Option C is also not applicable, as the slogan is not exclamatory and does not highlight a benefit in that manner. Thus, option D accurately captures the cleverness of the slogan's wording.
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, a reader can infer that
- A. the authors share a common point of view
- B. the authors are likely sports journalists for the same newspaper
- C. the authors each supported a different team in the game described
- D. the authors recognized that the referees of the game favored the Hawks
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, it can be inferred that the authors each supported a different team in the game described. This perspective often leads to varying interpretations of key moments and decisions, reflecting their biases. Option A is incorrect because sharing a common point of view would result in similar accounts, which contradicts the premise of differences. Option B assumes a professional relationship that is not supported by the text; different viewpoints suggest they may not be affiliated. Option D implies a shared judgment about the referees, which does not align with the distinct perspectives presented in their accounts.
In evaluating the differences between the two accounts, it can be inferred that the authors each supported a different team in the game described. This perspective often leads to varying interpretations of key moments and decisions, reflecting their biases. Option A is incorrect because sharing a common point of view would result in similar accounts, which contradicts the premise of differences. Option B assumes a professional relationship that is not supported by the text; different viewpoints suggest they may not be affiliated. Option D implies a shared judgment about the referees, which does not align with the distinct perspectives presented in their accounts.