An expression for a company's cost to make n bicycles is -0.017n? - 6.8n + 690. An expression for the revenue from selling these n bicycles is 70n. Profit is revenue minus cost. Which is an expression for the profit for making and selling n bicycles?
- A. -0.017n^2 - 76.8n + 690
- B. 0.017n^2 + 76.8n - 690
- C. 0.017n^2 + 63.2n + 690
- D. -0.017n^2 + 63.2n + 690
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the profit from selling n bicycles, subtract the cost expression from the revenue expression. The cost is given as -0.017n² - 6.8n + 690, and the revenue is 70n. Calculating profit: Profit = Revenue - Cost = 70n - (-0.017n² - 6.8n + 690) simplifies to 70n + 0.017n² + 6.8n - 690, which results in 0.017n² + 63.2n - 690. Option D, -0.017n² + 63.2n + 690, incorrectly presents the quadratic term with the wrong sign. Options A and B incorrectly combine terms or misrepresent the coefficients. Option C miscalculates the constant term. Thus, only option D maintains the correct profit structure.
To find the profit from selling n bicycles, subtract the cost expression from the revenue expression. The cost is given as -0.017n² - 6.8n + 690, and the revenue is 70n. Calculating profit: Profit = Revenue - Cost = 70n - (-0.017n² - 6.8n + 690) simplifies to 70n + 0.017n² + 6.8n - 690, which results in 0.017n² + 63.2n - 690. Option D, -0.017n² + 63.2n + 690, incorrectly presents the quadratic term with the wrong sign. Options A and B incorrectly combine terms or misrepresent the coefficients. Option C miscalculates the constant term. Thus, only option D maintains the correct profit structure.
Other Related Questions
The daily cost, C(x), tor a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
Which list shows the numbers arranged from least to greatest?
- A. -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11), -1
- B. -1, -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11)
- C. -1, -(2/11), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/9)
- D. -(2/11), -0.2, -0.21, -(2/9), -1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.
The distance, d, in feet, it takes to come to a complete stop when driving a car r miles per hour can be found using the equation d = 1/20(r^2)+ r. If it takes a car 240 feet to come to a complete stop, what was the speed of the car, in miles per hour, when the driver began to stop it?
- A. 40
- B. 30
- C. 60
- D. 80
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the speed of the car when it takes 240 feet to stop, substitute d = 240 into the equation d = 1/20(r^2) + r. This leads to the equation 240 = 1/20(r^2) + r. Multiplying through by 20 simplifies to 4800 = r^2 + 20r, which rearranges to r^2 + 20r - 4800 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation yields r = 40 or r = -120. Since speed cannot be negative, the valid solution is 40 mph. Option B (30) does not satisfy the equation, leading to a shorter stopping distance. Option C (60) results in a stopping distance of 480 feet, which exceeds 240 feet. Option D (80) produces a stopping distance of 800 feet, also incorrect. Thus, only 40 mph meets the criteria.
To find the speed of the car when it takes 240 feet to stop, substitute d = 240 into the equation d = 1/20(r^2) + r. This leads to the equation 240 = 1/20(r^2) + r. Multiplying through by 20 simplifies to 4800 = r^2 + 20r, which rearranges to r^2 + 20r - 4800 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation yields r = 40 or r = -120. Since speed cannot be negative, the valid solution is 40 mph. Option B (30) does not satisfy the equation, leading to a shorter stopping distance. Option C (60) results in a stopping distance of 480 feet, which exceeds 240 feet. Option D (80) produces a stopping distance of 800 feet, also incorrect. Thus, only 40 mph meets the criteria.
Which graph represents the solution of x + 5 ≤ 3?
-
A.
-
B.
-
C.
-
D.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the inequality x + 5 ≤ 3, we first isolate x by subtracting 5 from both sides, giving us x ≤ -2. Option A correctly represents this solution with a closed circle at -2, indicating that -2 is included in the solution set, and a shaded line extending to the left, showing all values less than -2. Options B, C, and D either depict open circles, which imply that the endpoint is not included, or incorrectly shade in the wrong direction or range, failing to accurately represent the solution x ≤ -2.
To solve the inequality x + 5 ≤ 3, we first isolate x by subtracting 5 from both sides, giving us x ≤ -2. Option A correctly represents this solution with a closed circle at -2, indicating that -2 is included in the solution set, and a shaded line extending to the left, showing all values less than -2. Options B, C, and D either depict open circles, which imply that the endpoint is not included, or incorrectly shade in the wrong direction or range, failing to accurately represent the solution x ≤ -2.