The top speed of the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise is 33 knots. A knot is the speed of a ship in nautical miles per hour. What is the top speed, in miles per hour? (1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet; 1 mile - 5,280 feet)
- A. 24 miles per hour
- B. 38 miles per hour
- C. 33 miles per hour
- D. 29 miles per hour
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To convert knots to miles per hour, it’s essential to understand the relationship between nautical miles and standard miles. Since 1 nautical mile equals 6,076 feet and 1 mile equals 5,280 feet, we can set up the conversion: 1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet / 5,280 feet/mile = 1.151 miles. Thus, to convert 33 knots to miles per hour: 33 knots × 1.151 miles/nautical mile = 38.0 miles per hour. Option A (24 mph) is too low, failing to account for the conversion factor. Option C (33 mph) incorrectly assumes knots and miles per hour are equivalent. Option D (29 mph) underestimates the conversion, not reaching the correct calculation.
To convert knots to miles per hour, it’s essential to understand the relationship between nautical miles and standard miles. Since 1 nautical mile equals 6,076 feet and 1 mile equals 5,280 feet, we can set up the conversion: 1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet / 5,280 feet/mile = 1.151 miles. Thus, to convert 33 knots to miles per hour: 33 knots × 1.151 miles/nautical mile = 38.0 miles per hour. Option A (24 mph) is too low, failing to account for the conversion factor. Option C (33 mph) incorrectly assumes knots and miles per hour are equivalent. Option D (29 mph) underestimates the conversion, not reaching the correct calculation.
Other Related Questions
Which equation represents the graphed line?
- A. y = -1/3x +3
- B. y = 3x - 7
- C. y = 3x + 7
- D. y = 1/3x + 1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The equation y = 1/3x + 1 accurately represents the graphed line due to its positive slope of 1/3, indicating a gradual upward rise, consistent with the line’s direction. The y-intercept of 1 shows that the line crosses the y-axis at the point (0, 1), aligning perfectly with the graph. Option A, with a slope of -1/3, suggests a downward trend, which contradicts the graph’s upward slope. Option B has a much steeper slope of 3, leading to a different angle of rise. Option C also has a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 7, which does not match the graph’s intercept. Thus, only D accurately reflects both the slope and intercept of the line shown.
The equation y = 1/3x + 1 accurately represents the graphed line due to its positive slope of 1/3, indicating a gradual upward rise, consistent with the line’s direction. The y-intercept of 1 shows that the line crosses the y-axis at the point (0, 1), aligning perfectly with the graph. Option A, with a slope of -1/3, suggests a downward trend, which contradicts the graph’s upward slope. Option B has a much steeper slope of 3, leading to a different angle of rise. Option C also has a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 7, which does not match the graph’s intercept. Thus, only D accurately reflects both the slope and intercept of the line shown.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
Daniel wants to create a scatter plot of the data in the table to determine whether inventory affects median sales price. Which scatter plot will help Daniel make his determination?
-
A.
-
B.
-
C.
-
D.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A presents a scatter plot that effectively correlates inventory (months needed to sell) on the x-axis with median sales price on the y-axis. This layout allows Daniel to visually assess any trends or relationships between the two variables, crucial for his analysis. Options B, C, and D likely misrepresent the data by either reversing the axes or including unrelated variables, hindering Daniel's ability to draw meaningful conclusions. Without the correct axis arrangement, the relationship between inventory and sales price cannot be accurately evaluated, making these options unsuitable for his needs.
Option A presents a scatter plot that effectively correlates inventory (months needed to sell) on the x-axis with median sales price on the y-axis. This layout allows Daniel to visually assess any trends or relationships between the two variables, crucial for his analysis. Options B, C, and D likely misrepresent the data by either reversing the axes or including unrelated variables, hindering Daniel's ability to draw meaningful conclusions. Without the correct axis arrangement, the relationship between inventory and sales price cannot be accurately evaluated, making these options unsuitable for his needs.
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
A scale drawing of a truck has a length of 3 inches (in.), as shown below. The actual truck has a length of 18 feet (ft). What scale was used for the drawing?
- A. 6 in. = 1 ft
- B. 1 in. = 15 ft
- C. 1 in. = 6 ft
- D. 15 in. = 1 ft
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.