Frederick Winslow Taylor
The following is an obituary from March 21, 1915, announcing the death of Frederick Winslow Taylor.
1 PHILADELPHIA, March 21: Frederick Winslow Tayler, originator of the modem scientific management movement, died here today from pneumonia. He was 59 years old, and was a former President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Among his numerous inventions and discoveries was the Taylor-White process of treating modem high-speed took. He was the author of articles on scientific efficiency. and installed his system in many large industrial establishments.
2 The writings and lectures of Frederic Winslow Taylor formed the basis of the recent reorganization of methods of handing labor in many of the largest industries in the country. The articles of Mr. Taylor on "Scientific Management" in 1911 had a good deal to do with giving its new, special meaning to the word "efficiency" and making it the watchword which it has become since that time.
3 One of his leading doctrines which has made a deep impression on business and industry in this country since that time is that a man who proves incompetent at one jab should be fitted in where he can give good service, instead of being discharged. His life work was chiefly devoted to the simplification of industrial processes to reduce costs and increase Outputs.
4 Mr. Taylor was born at Germantown, Philadelphia, on March 20, 1856, and was graduated from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1883. He won the doubles championship of the United States at tennis at Newport in 1881. He entered the employ of the Midvale Steel Company at Philadelphia in 1878 and was successively gang boss, assistant foreman, foreman of the machine shop, master mechanic, chief draughtsman, and chief engineer.
5 In 1889 he began his special work of re-organizing the management of
Based on the obituary, for what was Taylor best known?
- A. Being president of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
- B. Winning a U.S. tennis championship
- C. Inventing a way to treat high-speed tools
- D. Developing theories on scientific management
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Taylor was best known for developing theories on scientific management, which revolutionized industrial efficiency and productivity. His principles laid the groundwork for modern management practices, making him a pivotal figure in the field. Option A is incorrect; while Taylor may have had connections to engineering societies, he is not primarily recognized for his presidency in any organization. Option B is not applicable, as there is no evidence linking him to tennis achievements. Option C, although related to engineering, does not capture the essence of Taylor's legacy, which centers on management theory rather than specific inventions.
Taylor was best known for developing theories on scientific management, which revolutionized industrial efficiency and productivity. His principles laid the groundwork for modern management practices, making him a pivotal figure in the field. Option A is incorrect; while Taylor may have had connections to engineering societies, he is not primarily recognized for his presidency in any organization. Option B is not applicable, as there is no evidence linking him to tennis achievements. Option C, although related to engineering, does not capture the essence of Taylor's legacy, which centers on management theory rather than specific inventions.
Other Related Questions
Which of these statements best describes the difference between Commonwealth v. Hunt and Muller v. Oregon?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to education cases, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to issues of labor relations.
- B. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to labor issues, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to free speech issues.
- C. Both cases deal with labor issues; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon gives businesses the right to challenge unions' demands.
- D. Both cases deal with labor cases; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon supports state regulation of working hours for women.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.
Why were most of the passengers denied permission to enter Cuba?
- A. Cuba had already accepted all the refugees it could for that year.
- B. Cuba and Germany did not have diplomatic relations at that time.
- C. Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally.
- D. It was feared that admitting them would create tension with Germany.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
The government permits a group of people to protest in front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Which amendment protects this action?
- A. Amendment 1
- B. Amendment 4
- C. Amendment 5
- D. Amendment 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The First Amendment protects the right to free speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government, which includes the act of protesting. This foundational freedom allows individuals to express their views publicly, especially in front of significant government buildings like the U.S. Capitol. Amendment 4 focuses on protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which does not pertain to protest rights. Amendment 5 addresses rights related to legal proceedings, such as self-incrimination and due process, while Amendment 10 reserves powers to the states and the people, neither of which directly relates to the act of protesting.
The First Amendment protects the right to free speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government, which includes the act of protesting. This foundational freedom allows individuals to express their views publicly, especially in front of significant government buildings like the U.S. Capitol. Amendment 4 focuses on protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, which does not pertain to protest rights. Amendment 5 addresses rights related to legal proceedings, such as self-incrimination and due process, while Amendment 10 reserves powers to the states and the people, neither of which directly relates to the act of protesting.
Which statement is true about the four countries that accepted the passengers?
- A. They had camps similar to those established by Germany.
- B. They were allies during World War II.
- C. They had Europe's largest populations prior to World War I.
- D. They each shared a border with Germany.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B is accurate as the four countries that accepted the passengers were indeed allies during World War II, collaborating against the Axis powers. Option A is incorrect because these countries did not establish camps similar to those in Germany; instead, they provided refuge to those fleeing persecution. Option C is misleading; while some of these countries had significant populations, they were not necessarily the largest in Europe prior to World War I. Option D is false as not all of the countries shared a border with Germany, which limits the applicability of this statement.
Option B is accurate as the four countries that accepted the passengers were indeed allies during World War II, collaborating against the Axis powers. Option A is incorrect because these countries did not establish camps similar to those in Germany; instead, they provided refuge to those fleeing persecution. Option C is misleading; while some of these countries had significant populations, they were not necessarily the largest in Europe prior to World War I. Option D is false as not all of the countries shared a border with Germany, which limits the applicability of this statement.