Marisol has 5 times as many books as Jerry. Jerry has 15 books. How many books does Marisol have?
- A. 10
- B. 20
- C. 75
- D. 225
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine how many books Marisol has, start by recognizing that she has 5 times the number of books Jerry has. Since Jerry has 15 books, you multiply 15 by 5: 15 × 5 = 75. Thus, Marisol has 75 books. Option A (10) is incorrect as it suggests Marisol has fewer books than Jerry. Option B (20) also underestimates her total, as it does not account for the multiplication factor of 5. Option D (225) overestimates the total by incorrectly multiplying the number of Jerry's books. Only option C accurately reflects the calculation based on the relationship between Marisol's and Jerry's books.
To determine how many books Marisol has, start by recognizing that she has 5 times the number of books Jerry has. Since Jerry has 15 books, you multiply 15 by 5: 15 × 5 = 75. Thus, Marisol has 75 books. Option A (10) is incorrect as it suggests Marisol has fewer books than Jerry. Option B (20) also underestimates her total, as it does not account for the multiplication factor of 5. Option D (225) overestimates the total by incorrectly multiplying the number of Jerry's books. Only option C accurately reflects the calculation based on the relationship between Marisol's and Jerry's books.
Other Related Questions
Fred worked 39.5 hours last week. Alice worked 6.75 fewer hours than Fred. How many hours did Alice work?
- A. 33.75 HOURS
- B. 33.25 HOURS
- C. 33.35 HOURS
- D. 33.85 HOURS
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
Which of the following is equivalent to 1.04?
- A. 52/51
- B. 51/50
- C. 27/25
- D. 26/25
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the equivalence to 1.04, we can convert each fraction to a decimal. Option A, 52/51, equals approximately 1.0196, which is less than 1.04. Option B, 51/50, equals 1.02, also less than 1.04. Option C, 27/25, equals 1.08, exceeding 1.04. Option D, 26/25, simplifies to 1.04, matching the target value exactly. Thus, only option D accurately represents 1.04, while the others deviate from this value.
To determine the equivalence to 1.04, we can convert each fraction to a decimal. Option A, 52/51, equals approximately 1.0196, which is less than 1.04. Option B, 51/50, equals 1.02, also less than 1.04. Option C, 27/25, equals 1.08, exceeding 1.04. Option D, 26/25, simplifies to 1.04, matching the target value exactly. Thus, only option D accurately represents 1.04, while the others deviate from this value.
76 ÷ 0.01 =
- A. 0.76
- B. 7.6
- C. 760
- D. 7,600
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To solve 76 ÷ 0.01, it is helpful to recognize that dividing by a decimal is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. The reciprocal of 0.01 is 100, so this operation can be rewritten as 76 × 100, which equals 7,600. Option A (0.76) incorrectly suggests a much smaller result, as it misinterprets the division. Option B (7.6) also underestimates the value, failing to account for the decimal's effect. Option C (760) is closer but still incorrect, as it does not fully account for the multiplication by 100. Therefore, D (7,600) accurately reflects the operation's outcome.
To solve 76 ÷ 0.01, it is helpful to recognize that dividing by a decimal is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. The reciprocal of 0.01 is 100, so this operation can be rewritten as 76 × 100, which equals 7,600. Option A (0.76) incorrectly suggests a much smaller result, as it misinterprets the division. Option B (7.6) also underestimates the value, failing to account for the decimal's effect. Option C (760) is closer but still incorrect, as it does not fully account for the multiplication by 100. Therefore, D (7,600) accurately reflects the operation's outcome.
Of the following, which is closest to 17/6 + 6/17 ?
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. 23
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.