Multiplying a certain nonzero number by 0.01 gives the same result as dividing the number by
- A. 100
- B. 10
- C. 1/10
- D. 1/100
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.
Other Related Questions
Of the following, which is closest to (2,12/15 - 1/10) ÷ 16/6 ?
- B. 1
- C. 2
- D. 3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve (2, 12/15 - 1/10) ÷ (16/6), first, convert the mixed number 2, 12/15 to an improper fraction: 2 = 30/15, so 2, 12/15 = 30/15 + 12/15 = 42/15. Next, simplify 12/15 - 1/10. Finding a common denominator (30), we have 24/30 - 3/30 = 21/30, which simplifies to 7/10. Thus, we compute (42/15 - 7/10) = (28/10 - 21/30) = (84/30 - 21/30) = 63/30 = 21/10. Dividing by (16/6) equals (21/10) ÷ (8/3) = (21/10) × (3/8) = 63/80, which is closest to 1. Options C and D (2 and 3) are incorrect as they overshoot the calculated value, while option B (1) accurately reflects the result of the division.
To solve (2, 12/15 - 1/10) ÷ (16/6), first, convert the mixed number 2, 12/15 to an improper fraction: 2 = 30/15, so 2, 12/15 = 30/15 + 12/15 = 42/15. Next, simplify 12/15 - 1/10. Finding a common denominator (30), we have 24/30 - 3/30 = 21/30, which simplifies to 7/10. Thus, we compute (42/15 - 7/10) = (28/10 - 21/30) = (84/30 - 21/30) = 63/30 = 21/10. Dividing by (16/6) equals (21/10) ÷ (8/3) = (21/10) × (3/8) = 63/80, which is closest to 1. Options C and D (2 and 3) are incorrect as they overshoot the calculated value, while option B (1) accurately reflects the result of the division.
4/9 (3/16 - 1/12) =
- A. 5/108
- B. 5/48
- C. 2/9
- D. 20/48
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve \( \frac{4}{9} \left( \frac{3}{16} - \frac{1}{12} \right) \), first calculate \( \frac{3}{16} - \frac{1}{12} \). Finding a common denominator (48), we convert the fractions: \( \frac{3}{16} = \frac{9}{48} \) and \( \frac{1}{12} = \frac{4}{48} \). Thus, \( \frac{9}{48} - \frac{4}{48} = \frac{5}{48} \). Next, multiply \( \frac{4}{9} \) by \( \frac{5}{48} \): \[ \frac{4 \times 5}{9 \times 48} = \frac{20}{432} = \frac{5}{108} \] Option B (5/48) is incorrect as it misrepresents the multiplication step. Option C (2/9) ignores the subtraction and multiplication entirely. Option D (20/48) fails to simplify the fraction correctly.
To solve \( \frac{4}{9} \left( \frac{3}{16} - \frac{1}{12} \right) \), first calculate \( \frac{3}{16} - \frac{1}{12} \). Finding a common denominator (48), we convert the fractions: \( \frac{3}{16} = \frac{9}{48} \) and \( \frac{1}{12} = \frac{4}{48} \). Thus, \( \frac{9}{48} - \frac{4}{48} = \frac{5}{48} \). Next, multiply \( \frac{4}{9} \) by \( \frac{5}{48} \): \[ \frac{4 \times 5}{9 \times 48} = \frac{20}{432} = \frac{5}{108} \] Option B (5/48) is incorrect as it misrepresents the multiplication step. Option C (2/9) ignores the subtraction and multiplication entirely. Option D (20/48) fails to simplify the fraction correctly.
Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan from the school library. Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda has. If Richard has borrowed 17 books from the library, how many books has Susan borrowed?
- A. 25
- B. 26
- C. 34
- D. 42
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
50.50 ÷ 0.25
- A. 202
- B. 2.2
- C. 2.02
- D. 0.22
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 50.50 ÷ 0.25, converting the division into a simpler form is helpful. Dividing both numbers by 0.25 effectively transforms the problem into 50.50 ÷ 0.25 = 50.50 × 4, which equals 202. Option B (2.2) is incorrect as it misrepresents the scale of the division, resulting from a misunderstanding of decimal placement. Option C (2.02) also miscalculates the division, likely stemming from incorrect multiplication or division steps. Option D (0.22) is far too low, indicating a significant error in understanding the relationship between the dividend and divisor.
To solve 50.50 ÷ 0.25, converting the division into a simpler form is helpful. Dividing both numbers by 0.25 effectively transforms the problem into 50.50 ÷ 0.25 = 50.50 × 4, which equals 202. Option B (2.2) is incorrect as it misrepresents the scale of the division, resulting from a misunderstanding of decimal placement. Option C (2.02) also miscalculates the division, likely stemming from incorrect multiplication or division steps. Option D (0.22) is far too low, indicating a significant error in understanding the relationship between the dividend and divisor.