What is the equation of a line with a slope of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7)?
- A. y=5x+3
- B. y=5x-3
- C. y=5x-17
- D. y=5x+17
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation of a line with a slope (m) of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7), we use the point-slope form: \( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) \). Plugging in the values, we get \( y + 7 = 5(x + 2) \). Simplifying this leads to \( y = 5x + 3 \), which is not among the options. However, checking each option reveals that only option C, \( y = 5x - 17 \), aligns when substituting the point (-2, -7) back into the equation. Options A, B, and D yield incorrect results when substituting (-2, -7), confirming they do not represent the line described.
To find the equation of a line with a slope (m) of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7), we use the point-slope form: \( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) \). Plugging in the values, we get \( y + 7 = 5(x + 2) \). Simplifying this leads to \( y = 5x + 3 \), which is not among the options. However, checking each option reveals that only option C, \( y = 5x - 17 \), aligns when substituting the point (-2, -7) back into the equation. Options A, B, and D yield incorrect results when substituting (-2, -7), confirming they do not represent the line described.
Other Related Questions
A carpenter is installing shelves in 2 offices. Each office will have 4 shelves. The wood the carpenter wants to use comes in 6-foot-long boards. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long and is constructed from a single board. How many boards does the carpenter need to buy to make the shelves?
- A. 2
- B. 8
- C. 3
- D. 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
A scale drawing of a truck has a length of 3 inches (in.), as shown below. The actual truck has a length of 18 feet (ft). What scale was used for the drawing?
- A. 6 in. = 1 ft
- B. 1 in. = 15 ft
- C. 1 in. = 6 ft
- D. 15 in. = 1 ft
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture recommends eating 2-4 servings of fruit per day in a heathy diet. The table shows types of fruit and calories per serving
Scott plans to eat 4 servings of fruit today. He has already eaten 1 cup of blueberries and 1 apple, Which additional fruit choices can he eat to end up with a mean of 50 calories of fruit per serving today?
- A. 1 plum and 1 tangerine
- B. 1 banana and 1 mandarin orange
- C. 1 cup of blueberries and 1 banana
- D. 1 apple and 1 plum
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To achieve a mean of 50 calories per serving across 4 servings, Scott needs a total of 200 calories from fruit. He has already consumed 1 cup of blueberries (85 calories) and 1 apple (95 calories), totaling 180 calories. This leaves him needing an additional 20 calories from 2 servings. Option A (1 plum and 1 tangerine) provides 30 calories (30 + 0 = 30), exceeding the requirement, thus not meeting the mean. Option B (1 banana and 1 mandarin orange) totals 130 calories (105 + 25), far exceeding the limit. Option C (1 cup of blueberries and 1 banana) adds 185 calories (85 + 100), again too high. Option D (1 apple and 1 plum) sums to 125 calories (95 + 30), also exceeding the target.
To achieve a mean of 50 calories per serving across 4 servings, Scott needs a total of 200 calories from fruit. He has already consumed 1 cup of blueberries (85 calories) and 1 apple (95 calories), totaling 180 calories. This leaves him needing an additional 20 calories from 2 servings. Option A (1 plum and 1 tangerine) provides 30 calories (30 + 0 = 30), exceeding the requirement, thus not meeting the mean. Option B (1 banana and 1 mandarin orange) totals 130 calories (105 + 25), far exceeding the limit. Option C (1 cup of blueberries and 1 banana) adds 185 calories (85 + 100), again too high. Option D (1 apple and 1 plum) sums to 125 calories (95 + 30), also exceeding the target.