What is the value of 2/5 multiplied by ¾ divide by 8/5
- A. 12\25
- B. 1\3
- C. 3\16
- D. 64/75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve \( \frac{2}{5} \times \frac{3}{4} \div \frac{8}{5} \), first, convert the division into multiplication by flipping the second fraction: \[ \frac{2}{5} \times \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{5}{8} \] Next, multiply the fractions: \[ \frac{2 \times 3 \times 5}{5 \times 4 \times 8} = \frac{30}{160} \] Simplifying \( \frac{30}{160} \) gives \( \frac{3}{16} \), confirming option C. Option A (12/25) is incorrect as it does not simplify correctly from the original operation. Option B (1/3) results from an incorrect multiplication or division process. Option D (64/75) does not match the calculated result and suggests an error in fraction handling.
To solve \( \frac{2}{5} \times \frac{3}{4} \div \frac{8}{5} \), first, convert the division into multiplication by flipping the second fraction: \[ \frac{2}{5} \times \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{5}{8} \] Next, multiply the fractions: \[ \frac{2 \times 3 \times 5}{5 \times 4 \times 8} = \frac{30}{160} \] Simplifying \( \frac{30}{160} \) gives \( \frac{3}{16} \), confirming option C. Option A (12/25) is incorrect as it does not simplify correctly from the original operation. Option B (1/3) results from an incorrect multiplication or division process. Option D (64/75) does not match the calculated result and suggests an error in fraction handling.
Other Related Questions
Dominic built a dog pen with a perimeter of 72 feet (ft). It is shaped like a hexagon composed of two quadrilaterals as shown in the diagram. Side g of the dog pen is a gate. What is the length, in feet, of the gate?
- A. 10
- B. 5
- C. 8
- D. 12
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the length of the gate (side g) in the hexagonal dog pen, we first calculate the total length of the remaining sides. Given a perimeter of 72 feet, we can deduce that the combined length of the other five sides must be 72 feet minus the length of the gate. Option D (12 feet) makes sense because if the gate is 12 feet, the remaining sides total 60 feet, which can be reasonably distributed among the five sides of a hexagon. Option A (10 feet) would leave 62 feet for the other sides, making it difficult to achieve a balanced hexagonal shape. Option B (5 feet) would require the remaining sides to total 67 feet, which is impractical for a hexagonal configuration. Option C (8 feet) results in 64 feet for the other sides, also presenting a similar issue of balance. Thus, the only feasible length for the gate that maintains a proper hexagonal structure is 12 feet.
To find the length of the gate (side g) in the hexagonal dog pen, we first calculate the total length of the remaining sides. Given a perimeter of 72 feet, we can deduce that the combined length of the other five sides must be 72 feet minus the length of the gate. Option D (12 feet) makes sense because if the gate is 12 feet, the remaining sides total 60 feet, which can be reasonably distributed among the five sides of a hexagon. Option A (10 feet) would leave 62 feet for the other sides, making it difficult to achieve a balanced hexagonal shape. Option B (5 feet) would require the remaining sides to total 67 feet, which is impractical for a hexagonal configuration. Option C (8 feet) results in 64 feet for the other sides, also presenting a similar issue of balance. Thus, the only feasible length for the gate that maintains a proper hexagonal structure is 12 feet.
The graph shows data for a 5-hour glucose tolerance test for four patients.
Symptoms of a patient with diabetes during a 5-hour glucose tolerance test include a high blood-glucose level that increases quickly and then decreases only minimally over the 5-hour period. Which patient displays symptoms of diabetes?
- A. patient 2
- B. patient 1
- C. patient 4
- D. patient 3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Patient 4 exhibits a rapid increase in blood glucose levels followed by a minimal decrease over the 5-hour test, indicating poor glucose regulation typical of diabetes. This pattern reflects the body's inability to effectively utilize insulin. In contrast, Patient 1 shows a quick rise followed by a significant decline, suggesting normal glucose metabolism. Patient 2 may demonstrate a slight increase but returns to baseline, indicating no diabetes. Patient 3's levels remain stable, which is also indicative of normal glucose tolerance. Thus, only Patient 4 aligns with the expected symptoms of diabetes during the test.
Patient 4 exhibits a rapid increase in blood glucose levels followed by a minimal decrease over the 5-hour test, indicating poor glucose regulation typical of diabetes. This pattern reflects the body's inability to effectively utilize insulin. In contrast, Patient 1 shows a quick rise followed by a significant decline, suggesting normal glucose metabolism. Patient 2 may demonstrate a slight increase but returns to baseline, indicating no diabetes. Patient 3's levels remain stable, which is also indicative of normal glucose tolerance. Thus, only Patient 4 aligns with the expected symptoms of diabetes during the test.
The width of a painting is 24 centimeters shorter than its length, x. The area of the painting is 4,081 square centimeters. Which equation could be used to find the dimensions of the painting?
- A. x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0
- B. x^2 + 24x - 4,081 = 0
- C. x^2 + 24x + 4,081 = 0
- D. x^2 - 24x + 4,081 = 0
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
A scale drawing of a truck has a length of 3 inches (in.), as shown below. The actual truck has a length of 18 feet (ft). What scale was used for the drawing?
- A. 6 in. = 1 ft
- B. 1 in. = 15 ft
- C. 1 in. = 6 ft
- D. 15 in. = 1 ft
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.
To determine the scale used for the drawing, we first convert the actual truck length from feet to inches. Since 1 foot equals 12 inches, an 18-foot truck is 216 inches long (18 ft x 12 in/ft). The scale drawing shows a length of 3 inches. To find the scale, we set up the ratio of the drawing length to the actual length: 3 in. (drawing) to 216 in. (actual). Simplifying this gives us a scale of 1 in. = 72 in., which translates to 1 in. = 6 ft (since 72 in. ÷ 12 in/ft = 6 ft). Option A (6 in. = 1 ft) is incorrect; it implies a much larger drawing. Option B (1 in. = 15 ft) underestimates the actual size. Option D (15 in. = 1 ft) greatly exaggerates the scale, making the drawing too small.