Which list shows the numbers arranged from least to greatest?
- A. -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11), -1
- B. -1, -(2/9), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/11)
- C. -1, -(2/11), -0.21, -0.2, -(2/9)
- D. -(2/11), -0.2, -0.21, -(2/9), -1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.
To determine the correct order, it's essential to convert fractions and decimals to comparable values. In option C, the numbers arranged from least to greatest are: -1, approximately -0.1818 (for -(2/11)), -0.21, -0.2, and approximately -0.2222 (for -(2/9)). This sequence accurately reflects their values. Option A incorrectly places -1 at the end, misordering the fractions and decimals. Option B also misplaces -1, and the order of the decimals is incorrect. Option D incorrectly ranks -1 as the least value and misplaces the fraction values, leading to an inaccurate arrangement.
Other Related Questions
Factor the expression completely: -3x - 21
- A. -3(x+7)
- B. -3(x-21)
- C. -3(x-7)
- D. -3(x+21)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To factor the expression -3x - 21 completely, start by identifying the common factor in both terms. Here, -3 is the greatest common factor. When factoring out -3 from -3x, you're left with x, and from -21, you have +7. Thus, the expression can be rewritten as -3(x + 7). Option B, -3(x - 21), is incorrect because factoring out -3 from -21 should yield +7, not -21. Option C, -3(x - 7), incorrectly represents the constant term, as it should be +7. Option D, -3(x + 21), misrepresents the factorization entirely, as it does not reflect the original expression's terms.
To factor the expression -3x - 21 completely, start by identifying the common factor in both terms. Here, -3 is the greatest common factor. When factoring out -3 from -3x, you're left with x, and from -21, you have +7. Thus, the expression can be rewritten as -3(x + 7). Option B, -3(x - 21), is incorrect because factoring out -3 from -21 should yield +7, not -21. Option C, -3(x - 7), incorrectly represents the constant term, as it should be +7. Option D, -3(x + 21), misrepresents the factorization entirely, as it does not reflect the original expression's terms.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura counts the number of strides she takes during her daily walks. She takes about 80 strides to walk the width of the field from Z to W. Assuming that her stride length does not change, about how many strides does Laura take to walk all the way around the edge of the field?
- A. 267
- B. 320
- C. 450
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
What is the equation of a line with a slope of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7)?
- A. y=5x+3
- B. y=5x-3
- C. y=5x-17
- D. y=5x+17
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation of a line with a slope (m) of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7), we use the point-slope form: \( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) \). Plugging in the values, we get \( y + 7 = 5(x + 2) \). Simplifying this leads to \( y = 5x + 3 \), which is not among the options. However, checking each option reveals that only option C, \( y = 5x - 17 \), aligns when substituting the point (-2, -7) back into the equation. Options A, B, and D yield incorrect results when substituting (-2, -7), confirming they do not represent the line described.
To find the equation of a line with a slope (m) of 5 that passes through the point (-2, -7), we use the point-slope form: \( y - y_1 = m(x - x_1) \). Plugging in the values, we get \( y + 7 = 5(x + 2) \). Simplifying this leads to \( y = 5x + 3 \), which is not among the options. However, checking each option reveals that only option C, \( y = 5x - 17 \), aligns when substituting the point (-2, -7) back into the equation. Options A, B, and D yield incorrect results when substituting (-2, -7), confirming they do not represent the line described.
The number line below shows the solution set of an inequality: Which two inequalities represent the graph shown?
- A. -2x>4 and 4x<-8
- B. 3x>-6 and x-4>6
- C. 4x<-8 and x≥6
- D. 4x<-8 and x≥6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.