Which of the following sentences contains irrelevant information and should be deleted from paragraph 17?
- A. Sentence 1
- B. Sentence 2
- C. Sentence 3
- D. Sentence 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Sentence 3 introduces information that does not directly support or relate to the main topic of paragraph 17, making it irrelevant. It distracts from the central argument and may confuse the reader. Sentence 1, Sentence 2, and Sentence 4 all contribute meaningfully to the paragraph's focus, offering necessary context or details that enhance understanding. Retaining these sentences ensures the flow and coherence of the paragraph, while removing Sentence 3 improves clarity and relevance.
Sentence 3 introduces information that does not directly support or relate to the main topic of paragraph 17, making it irrelevant. It distracts from the central argument and may confuse the reader. Sentence 1, Sentence 2, and Sentence 4 all contribute meaningfully to the paragraph's focus, offering necessary context or details that enhance understanding. Retaining these sentences ensures the flow and coherence of the paragraph, while removing Sentence 3 improves clarity and relevance.
Other Related Questions
Marco won a trophy each of the three times he competed in the junior tennis tournament, but still the first prize eluded him.
- A. eluded
- B. alluded
- C. elided
- D. allied
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In this context, "eluded" means that the first prize was out of Marco's reach despite his successes, which fits the sentence perfectly. Option B, "alluded," refers to making an indirect reference, which does not apply here. Option C, "elided," means to omit or leave out, which does not convey the intended meaning of something being out of reach. Option D, "allied," means to join or unite, which is irrelevant in this context. Thus, "eluded" accurately captures the sense of a goal that remains unattained despite effort.
In this context, "eluded" means that the first prize was out of Marco's reach despite his successes, which fits the sentence perfectly. Option B, "alluded," refers to making an indirect reference, which does not apply here. Option C, "elided," means to omit or leave out, which does not convey the intended meaning of something being out of reach. Option D, "allied," means to join or unite, which is irrelevant in this context. Thus, "eluded" accurately captures the sense of a goal that remains unattained despite effort.
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 13 (reproduced below)? But hunters capable of successfully hunting either aggressive animal should prefer buffalo; since one reaps more food from a larger animal.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. buffalo: since
- C. buffalo,
- D. buffalo since
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B, "buffalo: since," effectively links the two independent clauses while maintaining clarity. The colon indicates that the second clause explains the reasoning behind the preference for buffalo, enhancing the flow of the sentence. Option A retains the original structure, which creates a comma splice, leading to grammatical confusion. Option C, "buffalo," uses a comma, which incorrectly separates the clauses and disrupts the logical connection between them. Option D, "buffalo since," lacks punctuation, making it less clear that the second part elaborates on the first, resulting in a run-on sentence. Thus, option B is the most precise and grammatically correct choice.
Option B, "buffalo: since," effectively links the two independent clauses while maintaining clarity. The colon indicates that the second clause explains the reasoning behind the preference for buffalo, enhancing the flow of the sentence. Option A retains the original structure, which creates a comma splice, leading to grammatical confusion. Option C, "buffalo," uses a comma, which incorrectly separates the clauses and disrupts the logical connection between them. Option D, "buffalo since," lacks punctuation, making it less clear that the second part elaborates on the first, resulting in a run-on sentence. Thus, option B is the most precise and grammatically correct choice.
In context, which would be the best place to insert the following sentence? I took guitar lessons and practiced day and night.
- A. After sentence 9
- B. After sentence 11
- C. After sentence 15
- D. After sentence 16
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Inserting the sentence after sentence 9 effectively highlights a pivotal moment in the narrative, emphasizing the character's dedication to mastering the guitar. This placement allows for a smooth transition into the subsequent discussion of progress and challenges faced. Option B, after sentence 11, disrupts the flow, as it focuses on a different aspect of the character's journey. Option C, after sentence 15, feels too late, as it misses the opportunity to connect the dedication to earlier events. Option D, after sentence 16, would confuse the reader, as it follows a conclusion rather than enhancing the buildup of the character's commitment.
Inserting the sentence after sentence 9 effectively highlights a pivotal moment in the narrative, emphasizing the character's dedication to mastering the guitar. This placement allows for a smooth transition into the subsequent discussion of progress and challenges faced. Option B, after sentence 11, disrupts the flow, as it focuses on a different aspect of the character's journey. Option C, after sentence 15, feels too late, as it misses the opportunity to connect the dedication to earlier events. Option D, after sentence 16, would confuse the reader, as it follows a conclusion rather than enhancing the buildup of the character's commitment.
Abandoned in the attic were an old-fashioned doll, a set of trains, and a trunk full of children's clothes
- A. Abandoned in the attic were
- B. In the attic and abandoned,
- C. Abandoned and in the attic, there was
- D. It was in the attic and abandoned
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively presents the sentence with a clear subject and verb structure, maintaining a straightforward flow that emphasizes the items found in the attic. Option B disrupts the sentence's clarity by placing "in the attic" at the beginning, which can confuse the reader about what is being described. Option C introduces unnecessary complexity with "there was," making the sentence less direct and more cumbersome. Option D also complicates the structure with "it was," detracting from the focus on the items and their condition. Thus, A remains the most concise and coherent choice.
Option A effectively presents the sentence with a clear subject and verb structure, maintaining a straightforward flow that emphasizes the items found in the attic. Option B disrupts the sentence's clarity by placing "in the attic" at the beginning, which can confuse the reader about what is being described. Option C introduces unnecessary complexity with "there was," making the sentence less direct and more cumbersome. Option D also complicates the structure with "it was," detracting from the focus on the items and their condition. Thus, A remains the most concise and coherent choice.