Which of the following sentences contains irrelevant information and should be deleted from paragraph 17?
- A. Sentence 1
- B. Sentence 2
- C. Sentence 3
- D. Sentence 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Sentence 3 introduces information that does not directly support or relate to the main topic of paragraph 17, making it irrelevant. It distracts from the central argument and may confuse the reader. Sentence 1, Sentence 2, and Sentence 4 all contribute meaningfully to the paragraph's focus, offering necessary context or details that enhance understanding. Retaining these sentences ensures the flow and coherence of the paragraph, while removing Sentence 3 improves clarity and relevance.
Sentence 3 introduces information that does not directly support or relate to the main topic of paragraph 17, making it irrelevant. It distracts from the central argument and may confuse the reader. Sentence 1, Sentence 2, and Sentence 4 all contribute meaningfully to the paragraph's focus, offering necessary context or details that enhance understanding. Retaining these sentences ensures the flow and coherence of the paragraph, while removing Sentence 3 improves clarity and relevance.
Other Related Questions
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 4 (reproduced below)? He knew that he was the first poet to participate in these prestigious ceremonies; therefore, he contemplated which poem would be appropriate for the occasion.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. ceremonies, therefore,
- C. ceremonies, therefore;
- D. ceremonies, therefore
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A maintains the original structure, effectively connecting the two independent clauses with a semicolon. This punctuation is appropriate as it separates related but distinct ideas: the poet's recognition and his subsequent contemplation. Option B incorrectly uses a comma before "therefore," which fails to properly separate the clauses and creates a comma splice. Option C introduces an unnecessary semicolon before "therefore," which disrupts the flow and is grammatically incorrect since "therefore" is not an independent clause. Option D lacks punctuation after "ceremonies," making it a run-on sentence and confusing the relationship between the ideas.
Option A maintains the original structure, effectively connecting the two independent clauses with a semicolon. This punctuation is appropriate as it separates related but distinct ideas: the poet's recognition and his subsequent contemplation. Option B incorrectly uses a comma before "therefore," which fails to properly separate the clauses and creates a comma splice. Option C introduces an unnecessary semicolon before "therefore," which disrupts the flow and is grammatically incorrect since "therefore" is not an independent clause. Option D lacks punctuation after "ceremonies," making it a run-on sentence and confusing the relationship between the ideas.
Constructed in 1889 of thousands of tons of iron, millions visit the Eiffel Tower which is a beloved landmark of modern Paris.
- A. millions visit the Eiffel Tower, which is a beloved landmark of modern Paris
- B. millions visit the beloved Eiffel Tower, a landmark of modern Paris
- C. the Eiffel Tower is a beloved landmark of modern Paris visited by millions of people
- D. the Eiffel Tower, visited by millions of people and a beloved landmark of modern Paris
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively captures the essence of the Eiffel Tower's significance, emphasizing both its popularity and status as a beloved landmark. The structure of the sentence flows smoothly, maintaining a clear connection between the millions of visitors and the landmark itself. Option B, while similar, places "beloved" before "Eiffel Tower," which slightly alters the emphasis and disrupts the natural rhythm of the sentence. Option C is overly wordy and less engaging due to its passive construction, detracting from the lively image of the tower as a vibrant tourist attraction. Option D, although informative, is less direct and slightly awkward in phrasing, making it less effective in conveying the intended message.
Option A effectively captures the essence of the Eiffel Tower's significance, emphasizing both its popularity and status as a beloved landmark. The structure of the sentence flows smoothly, maintaining a clear connection between the millions of visitors and the landmark itself. Option B, while similar, places "beloved" before "Eiffel Tower," which slightly alters the emphasis and disrupts the natural rhythm of the sentence. Option C is overly wordy and less engaging due to its passive construction, detracting from the lively image of the tower as a vibrant tourist attraction. Option D, although informative, is less direct and slightly awkward in phrasing, making it less effective in conveying the intended message.
Which of the following sentences contains information irrelevant to the passage as a whole and should be deleted?
- A. Sentence 4
- B. Sentence 5
- C. Sentence 7
- D. Sentence 9
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Sentence 7 introduces an anecdote that, while interesting, does not contribute to the main argument of the passage. Its narrative focus distracts from the central theme, making it less relevant. Sentence 4 provides essential context that supports the overall message, while Sentence 5 summarizes key points, reinforcing the passage’s purpose. Sentence 9 offers a concluding thought that ties back to the main argument, enhancing the reader's understanding. Thus, only Sentence 7 diverges from the primary focus, warranting its removal for clarity and coherence.
Sentence 7 introduces an anecdote that, while interesting, does not contribute to the main argument of the passage. Its narrative focus distracts from the central theme, making it less relevant. Sentence 4 provides essential context that supports the overall message, while Sentence 5 summarizes key points, reinforcing the passage’s purpose. Sentence 9 offers a concluding thought that ties back to the main argument, enhancing the reader's understanding. Thus, only Sentence 7 diverges from the primary focus, warranting its removal for clarity and coherence.
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? Some researchers have cited this evidence as it made an argument that MSA hunters were less skilled than LSA hunters.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. evidence and were making
- C. evidence, having made
- D. evidence to make
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.