A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
Other Related Questions
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura counts the number of strides she takes during her daily walks. She takes about 80 strides to walk the width of the field from Z to W. Assuming that her stride length does not change, about how many strides does Laura take to walk all the way around the edge of the field?
- A. 267
- B. 320
- C. 450
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
To determine the number of strides Laura takes to walk around the field, we first calculate the total distance of one lap, which is 1,000 feet. Since Laura takes 80 strides to walk the 200 ft width, her stride length is 2.5 ft (200 ft ÷ 80 strides). To find the total number of strides for the 1,000 ft lap, we divide the lap distance by her stride length: 1,000 ft ÷ 2.5 ft/stride = 400 strides. Option A (267) underestimates her stride count, while B (320) and C (450) do not align with her stride length calculation, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, 400 strides accurately reflects her walking distance around the field.
The top speed of the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise is 33 knots. A knot is the speed of a ship in nautical miles per hour. What is the top speed, in miles per hour? (1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet; 1 mile - 5,280 feet)
- A. 24 miles per hour
- B. 38 miles per hour
- C. 33 miles per hour
- D. 29 miles per hour
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To convert knots to miles per hour, it’s essential to understand the relationship between nautical miles and standard miles. Since 1 nautical mile equals 6,076 feet and 1 mile equals 5,280 feet, we can set up the conversion: 1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet / 5,280 feet/mile = 1.151 miles. Thus, to convert 33 knots to miles per hour: 33 knots × 1.151 miles/nautical mile = 38.0 miles per hour. Option A (24 mph) is too low, failing to account for the conversion factor. Option C (33 mph) incorrectly assumes knots and miles per hour are equivalent. Option D (29 mph) underestimates the conversion, not reaching the correct calculation.
To convert knots to miles per hour, it’s essential to understand the relationship between nautical miles and standard miles. Since 1 nautical mile equals 6,076 feet and 1 mile equals 5,280 feet, we can set up the conversion: 1 nautical mile = 6,076 feet / 5,280 feet/mile = 1.151 miles. Thus, to convert 33 knots to miles per hour: 33 knots × 1.151 miles/nautical mile = 38.0 miles per hour. Option A (24 mph) is too low, failing to account for the conversion factor. Option C (33 mph) incorrectly assumes knots and miles per hour are equivalent. Option D (29 mph) underestimates the conversion, not reaching the correct calculation.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
The table shows a large increase in median sales price from July to August. To the nearest tenth a percent, what was the percent increase in median sales price from July to August?
- A. 15.8
- B. 6.2
- C. 14.2
- D. 6.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.
Solve the equation for x: ½ x + 9 = -2/3 x
- A. x=-9/7
- B. x=-54/7
- C. x=-6
- D. x=-54
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve the equation \( \frac{1}{2}x + 9 = -\frac{2}{3}x \), start by eliminating the fractions. Multiply the entire equation by 6 (the least common multiple of 2 and 3) to obtain \( 3x + 54 = -4x \). Next, combine like terms: adding \( 4x \) to both sides gives \( 7x + 54 = 0 \), leading to \( 7x = -54 \) and thus \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \). Option A is incorrect as it simplifies to a different value. Option C, \( x = -6 \), does not satisfy the original equation. Option D, \( x = -54 \), is also incorrect as it does not balance the equation. Therefore, the only viable solution is \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \).
To solve the equation \( \frac{1}{2}x + 9 = -\frac{2}{3}x \), start by eliminating the fractions. Multiply the entire equation by 6 (the least common multiple of 2 and 3) to obtain \( 3x + 54 = -4x \). Next, combine like terms: adding \( 4x \) to both sides gives \( 7x + 54 = 0 \), leading to \( 7x = -54 \) and thus \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \). Option A is incorrect as it simplifies to a different value. Option C, \( x = -6 \), does not satisfy the original equation. Option D, \( x = -54 \), is also incorrect as it does not balance the equation. Therefore, the only viable solution is \( x = -\frac{54}{7} \).