A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
Other Related Questions
A landscape worker is building a rock wall around a triangular flower garden. He has completed the rock wall on two sides of the garden.
The perimeter of the garden is 239 feet. What is the length, in feet, of the rock wall that the worker still needs to complete?
- A. 101
- B. 185
- C. 54
- D. 138
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.
An expression for a company's cost to make n bicycles is -0.017n? - 6.8n + 690. An expression for the revenue from selling these n bicycles is 70n. Profit is revenue minus cost. Which is an expression for the profit for making and selling n bicycles?
- A. -0.017n^2 - 76.8n + 690
- B. 0.017n^2 + 76.8n - 690
- C. 0.017n^2 + 63.2n + 690
- D. -0.017n^2 + 63.2n + 690
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the profit from selling n bicycles, subtract the cost expression from the revenue expression. The cost is given as -0.017n² - 6.8n + 690, and the revenue is 70n. Calculating profit: Profit = Revenue - Cost = 70n - (-0.017n² - 6.8n + 690) simplifies to 70n + 0.017n² + 6.8n - 690, which results in 0.017n² + 63.2n - 690. Option D, -0.017n² + 63.2n + 690, incorrectly presents the quadratic term with the wrong sign. Options A and B incorrectly combine terms or misrepresent the coefficients. Option C miscalculates the constant term. Thus, only option D maintains the correct profit structure.
To find the profit from selling n bicycles, subtract the cost expression from the revenue expression. The cost is given as -0.017n² - 6.8n + 690, and the revenue is 70n. Calculating profit: Profit = Revenue - Cost = 70n - (-0.017n² - 6.8n + 690) simplifies to 70n + 0.017n² + 6.8n - 690, which results in 0.017n² + 63.2n - 690. Option D, -0.017n² + 63.2n + 690, incorrectly presents the quadratic term with the wrong sign. Options A and B incorrectly combine terms or misrepresent the coefficients. Option C miscalculates the constant term. Thus, only option D maintains the correct profit structure.
Which graph represents the equation x - 2y = 4?
-
A.
-
B.
-
C.
-
D.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine which graph represents the equation \( x - 2y = 4 \), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form: \( y = \frac{1}{2}x - 2 \). This indicates a slope of \( \frac{1}{2} \) and a y-intercept at \( -2 \). Option A accurately reflects these characteristics, showing a line that rises gradually and crosses the y-axis at \( -2 \). Options B, C, and D do not have the correct slope or y-intercept. B has a steeper slope, C slopes downward, and D does not intersect the y-axis at the correct point. Thus, only Option A is consistent with the equation's graph.
To determine which graph represents the equation \( x - 2y = 4 \), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form: \( y = \frac{1}{2}x - 2 \). This indicates a slope of \( \frac{1}{2} \) and a y-intercept at \( -2 \). Option A accurately reflects these characteristics, showing a line that rises gradually and crosses the y-axis at \( -2 \). Options B, C, and D do not have the correct slope or y-intercept. B has a steeper slope, C slopes downward, and D does not intersect the y-axis at the correct point. Thus, only Option A is consistent with the equation's graph.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
Daniel wonders whether housing prices are more likely to increase or decrease in any special month. If he randomly selects a month other than January from the table, what is the price as a fraction, that the median sales price in that month was an increase over the previous month?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 4\7
To determine the fraction of months where the median sales price increased over the previous month, one must analyze the data presented in the table. The correct answer, 4/7, indicates that out of the seven months considered (excluding January), there were four months where prices rose compared to the month prior. Other options, such as 3/7 or 5/7, misrepresent the data by either underestimating or overestimating the actual increases. A fraction of 3/7 would imply that only three months saw an increase, which contradicts the evidence. Similarly, 5/7 would suggest an unrealistic majority of months experienced price hikes, not aligning with the data. Thus, 4/7 accurately reflects the observed trends in the provided data.
To determine the fraction of months where the median sales price increased over the previous month, one must analyze the data presented in the table. The correct answer, 4/7, indicates that out of the seven months considered (excluding January), there were four months where prices rose compared to the month prior. Other options, such as 3/7 or 5/7, misrepresent the data by either underestimating or overestimating the actual increases. A fraction of 3/7 would imply that only three months saw an increase, which contradicts the evidence. Similarly, 5/7 would suggest an unrealistic majority of months experienced price hikes, not aligning with the data. Thus, 4/7 accurately reflects the observed trends in the provided data.