A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
Other Related Questions
What is the value of the expression 2j - 7jkm when j = 5, k = -14, and m = -3?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To evaluate the expression \(2j - 7jkm\) with \(j = 5\), \(k = -14\), and \(m = -3\), first substitute the values: 1. Calculate \(2j\): \(2 \times 5 = 10\). 2. Calculate \(7jkm\): \(7 \times 5 \times -14 \times -3 = 1470\). 3. Combine the results: \(10 - 1470 = -1460\). Thus, the value of the expression is \(-1460\). Other options are incorrect because they either miscalculate the substitutions or the arithmetic operations involved, leading to different results that do not match the evaluated expression.
To evaluate the expression \(2j - 7jkm\) with \(j = 5\), \(k = -14\), and \(m = -3\), first substitute the values: 1. Calculate \(2j\): \(2 \times 5 = 10\). 2. Calculate \(7jkm\): \(7 \times 5 \times -14 \times -3 = 1470\). 3. Combine the results: \(10 - 1470 = -1460\). Thus, the value of the expression is \(-1460\). Other options are incorrect because they either miscalculate the substitutions or the arithmetic operations involved, leading to different results that do not match the evaluated expression.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura estimates that she can walk the length of the field from corner W to corner X in 55 seconds. To the nearest tenth of a mile per hour, what is her walking speed? (1 mile = 5,280 feet)
- A. 3.7
- B. 5.5
- C. 3.4
- D. 5.3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
Two points (a,b) and (c,d) are shown on a graph. Which of the following equations correctly represents the slope of the line that passes through these points.
- A. (b-d)/(a-c)
- B. (d-b)/(c-a)
- C. (b-d)/(c-a)
- D. (d-b)/(a-c)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the slope of a line passing through two points, the formula used is \((y_2 - y_1) / (x_2 - x_1)\). In this case, for points \((a, b)\) and \((c, d)\), we can label \((x_1, y_1) = (a, b)\) and \((x_2, y_2) = (c, d)\). Option B, \((d - b) / (c - a)\), correctly applies this formula, with \(d\) as \(y_2\) and \(b\) as \(y_1\). Option A, \((b - d) / (a - c)\), incorrectly reverses the subtraction for both \(y\) and \(x\). Option C, \((b - d) / (c - a)\), misplaces the order of \(y\) values, leading to an incorrect slope sign. Option D, \((d - b) / (a - c)\), also incorrectly reverses the \(x\) values, yielding an incorrect result.
To determine the slope of a line passing through two points, the formula used is \((y_2 - y_1) / (x_2 - x_1)\). In this case, for points \((a, b)\) and \((c, d)\), we can label \((x_1, y_1) = (a, b)\) and \((x_2, y_2) = (c, d)\). Option B, \((d - b) / (c - a)\), correctly applies this formula, with \(d\) as \(y_2\) and \(b\) as \(y_1\). Option A, \((b - d) / (a - c)\), incorrectly reverses the subtraction for both \(y\) and \(x\). Option C, \((b - d) / (c - a)\), misplaces the order of \(y\) values, leading to an incorrect slope sign. Option D, \((d - b) / (a - c)\), also incorrectly reverses the \(x\) values, yielding an incorrect result.
The width of a painting is 24 centimeters shorter than its length, x. The area of the painting is 4,081 square centimeters. Which equation could be used to find the dimensions of the painting?
- A. x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0
- B. x^2 + 24x - 4,081 = 0
- C. x^2 + 24x + 4,081 = 0
- D. x^2 - 24x + 4,081 = 0
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.
To find the dimensions of the painting, we start with the relationship between length and width. The width is 24 cm shorter than the length \(x\), so it can be expressed as \(x - 24\). The area of a rectangle is given by the product of its length and width, resulting in the equation \(x(x - 24) = 4,081\). Expanding this leads to \(x^2 - 24x - 4,081 = 0\), which matches option A. Option B incorrectly adds 24x, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C incorrectly adds 24 and includes a positive constant, which does not represent the area. Option D incorrectly adds 4,081 and has a positive term that does not reflect the relationship between length and width.