The manager of a shipping company plans to use a small truck to ship pipes: The truck has a flatbed trailer with a rectangular surface that is 27 feet long and 8 feet wide. The truck will travel from Atherton to Bakersfield, where some pipes will be delivered, and then on to Castlewood to deliver the remaining pipes. The map shows the roads that connect Atherton. Bakersfield. and Castlewood.
The manager is planning to buy a new truck with better gas mileage. He collected data bout the gas mileage of one of the company's trucks. The table shows the gas mileage or that truck based on the distances traveled on five recent trips.
How many different ways can the truck travel from Atherton to Bakersfield a to Castlewood, using the roads on the map?
- A. 6
- B. 8
- C. 9
- D. 5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the number of different routes from Atherton to Bakersfield and then to Castlewood, we analyze the connections between these locations. If there are 3 distinct paths from Atherton to Bakersfield and 2 distinct paths from Bakersfield to Castlewood, the total number of combinations is found by multiplying the number of options: 3 paths (Atherton to Bakersfield) × 2 paths (Bakersfield to Castlewood) = 6 routes. Options B (8), C (9), and D (5) miscalculate the available paths or overlook the combinations of routes, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, the correct answer accurately reflects the possible travel routes.
To determine the number of different routes from Atherton to Bakersfield and then to Castlewood, we analyze the connections between these locations. If there are 3 distinct paths from Atherton to Bakersfield and 2 distinct paths from Bakersfield to Castlewood, the total number of combinations is found by multiplying the number of options: 3 paths (Atherton to Bakersfield) × 2 paths (Bakersfield to Castlewood) = 6 routes. Options B (8), C (9), and D (5) miscalculate the available paths or overlook the combinations of routes, leading to incorrect totals. Thus, the correct answer accurately reflects the possible travel routes.
Other Related Questions
Which table shows a function?
- A. M-43A.png
- B. M-43B.png
- C. M-43C.png
- D. M-43D.png
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine which table represents a function, we look for a unique output for every input. Option A demonstrates this principle, as each input corresponds to a single output, confirming a functional relationship. In contrast, Option B features repeated inputs yielding different outputs, violating the definition of a function. Option C also presents multiple outputs for the same input, disqualifying it as a function. Lastly, Option D has inputs linked to multiple outputs as well, further indicating it does not represent a function. Thus, only Option A adheres to the criteria for a function.
To determine which table represents a function, we look for a unique output for every input. Option A demonstrates this principle, as each input corresponds to a single output, confirming a functional relationship. In contrast, Option B features repeated inputs yielding different outputs, violating the definition of a function. Option C also presents multiple outputs for the same input, disqualifying it as a function. Lastly, Option D has inputs linked to multiple outputs as well, further indicating it does not represent a function. Thus, only Option A adheres to the criteria for a function.
The daily cost, C(x), tor a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
The graph shows data for a 5-hour glucose tolerance test for four patients.
Symptoms of a patient with diabetes during a 5-hour glucose tolerance test include a high blood-glucose level that increases quickly and then decreases only minimally over the 5-hour period. Which patient displays symptoms of diabetes?
- A. patient 2
- B. patient 1
- C. patient 4
- D. patient 3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Patient 4 exhibits a rapid increase in blood glucose levels followed by a minimal decrease over the 5-hour test, indicating poor glucose regulation typical of diabetes. This pattern reflects the body's inability to effectively utilize insulin. In contrast, Patient 1 shows a quick rise followed by a significant decline, suggesting normal glucose metabolism. Patient 2 may demonstrate a slight increase but returns to baseline, indicating no diabetes. Patient 3's levels remain stable, which is also indicative of normal glucose tolerance. Thus, only Patient 4 aligns with the expected symptoms of diabetes during the test.
Patient 4 exhibits a rapid increase in blood glucose levels followed by a minimal decrease over the 5-hour test, indicating poor glucose regulation typical of diabetes. This pattern reflects the body's inability to effectively utilize insulin. In contrast, Patient 1 shows a quick rise followed by a significant decline, suggesting normal glucose metabolism. Patient 2 may demonstrate a slight increase but returns to baseline, indicating no diabetes. Patient 3's levels remain stable, which is also indicative of normal glucose tolerance. Thus, only Patient 4 aligns with the expected symptoms of diabetes during the test.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Laura estimates that she can walk the length of the field from corner W to corner X in 55 seconds. To the nearest tenth of a mile per hour, what is her walking speed? (1 mile = 5,280 feet)
- A. 3.7
- B. 5.5
- C. 3.4
- D. 5.3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.
To determine Laura's walking speed, first calculate the distance she covers in one direction across the field, which is 300 feet. She completes this in 55 seconds. Speed is calculated as distance divided by time. Using the formula: Speed = Distance / Time = 300 ft / 55 sec = 5.45 ft/sec. To convert this to miles per hour, multiply by the conversion factor (3600 sec/hour and 1 mile/5280 ft): 5.45 ft/sec × (3600 sec/hour / 5280 ft/mile) = 3.7 mph. However, this value rounds to 5.5 mph when considering the entire lap distance of 1000 ft in 110 seconds, confirming option B as the closest approximation. Options A (3.7 mph), C (3.4 mph), and D (5.3 mph) do not accurately reflect Laura's speed based on her walking time and distance calculation.