Tina Is designing a cabin. One of her plans for the cabin is a rectangle twice as long as it is wide, with 10 feet (ft) of the length reserved for the Kitchen and the bathroom. The diagram shows this basic plan. Tina wants the area of the main room to be 300 square feet. Which equation can be used to find x, the width, in feet, of the main room?
- A. 2x^2 + 10x - 300 = 0
- B. 2x^2 - 10x - 300 = 0
- C. 2x^2 - 20x - 300 = 0
- D. 2x^2 + 20x - 300 = 0
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the width \( x \) of the main room, we start with the area formula for a rectangle: Area = Length × Width. The cabin's length is twice the width, so it can be expressed as \( 2x \). Since 10 ft is allocated for the kitchen and bathroom, the length of the main room is \( 2x - 10 \). The equation for the area of the main room is therefore \( (2x - 10)x = 300 \), which simplifies to \( 2x^2 - 10x - 300 = 0 \), matching option B. Option A incorrectly adds \( 10x \) instead of subtracting, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C miscalculates the length by subtracting 20 instead of 10, while option D incorrectly adds 20, which does not reflect the reserved space. Thus, only option B accurately represents the relationship between length, width, and area.
To determine the width \( x \) of the main room, we start with the area formula for a rectangle: Area = Length × Width. The cabin's length is twice the width, so it can be expressed as \( 2x \). Since 10 ft is allocated for the kitchen and bathroom, the length of the main room is \( 2x - 10 \). The equation for the area of the main room is therefore \( (2x - 10)x = 300 \), which simplifies to \( 2x^2 - 10x - 300 = 0 \), matching option B. Option A incorrectly adds \( 10x \) instead of subtracting, leading to an incorrect area calculation. Option C miscalculates the length by subtracting 20 instead of 10, while option D incorrectly adds 20, which does not reflect the reserved space. Thus, only option B accurately represents the relationship between length, width, and area.
Other Related Questions
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Type your answer in the box. You may use numbers, a decimal point (.), and/or negative sign (-) in your answer.
One evening on her walk, Laura walks across the field from point W back to the gate at point G. What is the distance she walks, in feet, from point W to point G?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 250
To determine the distance Laura walks from point W to gate G, we can use the Pythagorean theorem. The field is a rectangle, and point W is at one corner. The length from W to G is half the length of the field (150 ft) and the width of the field (200 ft). Calculating the distance: Distance = √(150² + 200²) = √(22500 + 40000) = √62500 = 250 ft. Other options are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the geometric relationship of the points. Distances such as 300 ft or 200 ft misinterpret the diagonal distance, while any number below 250 fails to account for both dimensions of the rectangle.
To determine the distance Laura walks from point W to gate G, we can use the Pythagorean theorem. The field is a rectangle, and point W is at one corner. The length from W to G is half the length of the field (150 ft) and the width of the field (200 ft). Calculating the distance: Distance = √(150² + 200²) = √(22500 + 40000) = √62500 = 250 ft. Other options are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the geometric relationship of the points. Distances such as 300 ft or 200 ft misinterpret the diagonal distance, while any number below 250 fails to account for both dimensions of the rectangle.
Solve the equation for x: (2x-3)/5 = x/10
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 1\5
- D. 10
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the equation \((2x-3)/5 = x/10\), first eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by 10, resulting in \(2(2x - 3) = x\). Simplifying gives \(4x - 6 = x\). Rearranging leads to \(4x - x = 6\), or \(3x = 6\), giving \(x = 2\). Option B (3) does not satisfy the equation when substituted back. Option C (1/5) results in a negative left side, while Option D (10) leads to an incorrect balance in the original equation. Thus, the only solution that holds true is \(x = 2\).
To solve the equation \((2x-3)/5 = x/10\), first eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by 10, resulting in \(2(2x - 3) = x\). Simplifying gives \(4x - 6 = x\). Rearranging leads to \(4x - x = 6\), or \(3x = 6\), giving \(x = 2\). Option B (3) does not satisfy the equation when substituted back. Option C (1/5) results in a negative left side, while Option D (10) leads to an incorrect balance in the original equation. Thus, the only solution that holds true is \(x = 2\).
Compare the zeros of function P and function Q. Which statement about the zeros of the functions is true?
- A. Function P has the greater zero, which is 9.
- B. Function P has the greater zero, which is 1.
- C. Function Q has the greater zero, which is 5.
- D. Function Q has the greater zero, which is 4.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine which statement is true regarding the zeros of functions P and Q, it's essential to analyze the values given. Option A claims that function P's greater zero is 9; however, this contradicts the provided information, as 9 is not a zero for P. Option B asserts that function P's greater zero is 1, which is also incorrect if 1 is not the highest zero of P. Option D states that function Q's greater zero is 4, but if Q's zeros are higher, this option cannot be true. In contrast, option C correctly identifies that function Q has a greater zero, specifically 5, which aligns with the provided data about the functions' zeros.
To determine which statement is true regarding the zeros of functions P and Q, it's essential to analyze the values given. Option A claims that function P's greater zero is 9; however, this contradicts the provided information, as 9 is not a zero for P. Option B asserts that function P's greater zero is 1, which is also incorrect if 1 is not the highest zero of P. Option D states that function Q's greater zero is 4, but if Q's zeros are higher, this option cannot be true. In contrast, option C correctly identifies that function Q has a greater zero, specifically 5, which aligns with the provided data about the functions' zeros.