A campground rents canoes for either $20 per day or $4 per hour. For what number or numbers of hours, h, is it more expensive to rent a canoe at the daily rate than at the hourly rate?
- A. h = 5
- B. h >= 25
- C. h > 5
- D. h < 5
- E. h ≤ 5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine when renting a canoe at the daily rate exceeds the hourly rate, we compare the costs. The daily rate is $20, while the hourly rate is $4 per hour. Setting up the inequality, we have: \[ 20 > 4h \] Dividing both sides by 4 gives: \[ 5 > h \] This means that renting for more than 5 hours makes the daily rate more economical. Option A (h = 5) is incorrect since at 5 hours, both rates are equal. Option B (h ≥ 25) is incorrect because it's not relevant to the threshold we calculated. Option D (h < 5) suggests a scenario where the daily rate is not more expensive, which contradicts our findings. Option E (h ≤ 5) includes values where the rates are equal or less, which doesn't satisfy the condition.
To determine when renting a canoe at the daily rate exceeds the hourly rate, we compare the costs. The daily rate is $20, while the hourly rate is $4 per hour. Setting up the inequality, we have: \[ 20 > 4h \] Dividing both sides by 4 gives: \[ 5 > h \] This means that renting for more than 5 hours makes the daily rate more economical. Option A (h = 5) is incorrect since at 5 hours, both rates are equal. Option B (h ≥ 25) is incorrect because it's not relevant to the threshold we calculated. Option D (h < 5) suggests a scenario where the daily rate is not more expensive, which contradicts our findings. Option E (h ≤ 5) includes values where the rates are equal or less, which doesn't satisfy the condition.
Other Related Questions
Emma measured the height of her laptop screen. She reported the height as 8 inches, accurate to the nearest inch. The actual height of the screen must be:
- A. at least 7.5 inches and less than 8.5 inches
- B. at least 7.9 inches and less than 8.1 inches
- C. at least 7.99 inches and less than 8.01 inches
- D. at least 8 inches
- E. exactly 8 inches
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
When measuring to the nearest inch, values can range from halfway to the next whole number. For Emma's reported height of 8 inches, this means the actual height must be at least 7.5 inches (inclusive) and less than 8.5 inches (exclusive). Option B is too narrow, only allowing for heights between 7.9 and 8.1 inches, which does not encompass all possible values. Option C is even more restrictive, only allowing for heights between 7.99 and 8.01 inches, excluding valid measurements. Option D is incorrect as it suggests the height must be 8 inches or more, which is too limiting. Option E incorrectly states the height must be exactly 8 inches, disregarding the range of possible values.
When measuring to the nearest inch, values can range from halfway to the next whole number. For Emma's reported height of 8 inches, this means the actual height must be at least 7.5 inches (inclusive) and less than 8.5 inches (exclusive). Option B is too narrow, only allowing for heights between 7.9 and 8.1 inches, which does not encompass all possible values. Option C is even more restrictive, only allowing for heights between 7.99 and 8.01 inches, excluding valid measurements. Option D is incorrect as it suggests the height must be 8 inches or more, which is too limiting. Option E incorrectly states the height must be exactly 8 inches, disregarding the range of possible values.
The recommended dosage of a medicine is 4 milligrams per kilogram of body weight. What is the recommended dosage, in milligrams, for a person who weighs 84 kilograms?
- A. 21
- B. 88
- C. 324
- D. 336
- E. 2100
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the recommended dosage for a person weighing 84 kilograms, multiply their weight by the dosage per kilogram: 4 mg/kg × 84 kg = 336 mg. Option A (21 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the dosage based on the weight. Option B (88 mg) also miscalculates the dosage, failing to apply the correct multiplication. Option C (324 mg) is close but still incorrect, as it does not reflect the accurate calculation. Option E (2100 mg) is far too high, indicating a misunderstanding of the dosage per kilogram. Thus, 336 mg is the correct dosage for the individual.
To determine the recommended dosage for a person weighing 84 kilograms, multiply their weight by the dosage per kilogram: 4 mg/kg × 84 kg = 336 mg. Option A (21 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the dosage based on the weight. Option B (88 mg) also miscalculates the dosage, failing to apply the correct multiplication. Option C (324 mg) is close but still incorrect, as it does not reflect the accurate calculation. Option E (2100 mg) is far too high, indicating a misunderstanding of the dosage per kilogram. Thus, 336 mg is the correct dosage for the individual.
Through which pair of points could a line of best fit be drawn for the data on the scatterplot?
- A. (0, 36) and (11, 74)
- B. (1, 39) and (6, 60)
- C. (5, 50) and (6, 60)
- D. (6, 60) and (8, 60)
- E. (8, 60) and (11, 74)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A, with points (0, 36) and (11, 74), shows a significant range in both x and y values, indicating a strong upward trend that aligns well with the overall direction of the data. Option B, while showing an upward trend, has a narrower range and may not represent the overall data as effectively. Option C features two points that are too close together, limiting their ability to define a clear line of best fit. Option D includes points with the same y-value, suggesting a horizontal line that does not capture the data's trend. Option E, like A, has a valid upward trend but does not span the data range as effectively as A.
Option A, with points (0, 36) and (11, 74), shows a significant range in both x and y values, indicating a strong upward trend that aligns well with the overall direction of the data. Option B, while showing an upward trend, has a narrower range and may not represent the overall data as effectively. Option C features two points that are too close together, limiting their ability to define a clear line of best fit. Option D includes points with the same y-value, suggesting a horizontal line that does not capture the data's trend. Option E, like A, has a valid upward trend but does not span the data range as effectively as A.
The expression 6a + 4c represents the total price, in dollars, of admission to an air show for a adults and c children. On Saturday, 380 adults and 120 children paid admission to the air show. What was the total price of admission for those people?
- A. 524
- B. 2240
- C. 2760
- D. 5000
- E. 12000
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the total price of admission, substitute the values of adults (a) and children (c) into the expression 6a + 4c. Here, a = 380 and c = 120. Calculating: 6(380) + 4(120) = 2280 + 480 = 2760. Thus, the total price is 2760 dollars. Option A (524) is too low, as it doesn't account for the number of attendees. Option B (2240) underestimates the total, likely misunderstanding the pricing structure. Option D (5000) and Option E (12000) are excessively high, suggesting a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the pricing per adult and child.
To find the total price of admission, substitute the values of adults (a) and children (c) into the expression 6a + 4c. Here, a = 380 and c = 120. Calculating: 6(380) + 4(120) = 2280 + 480 = 2760. Thus, the total price is 2760 dollars. Option A (524) is too low, as it doesn't account for the number of attendees. Option B (2240) underestimates the total, likely misunderstanding the pricing structure. Option D (5000) and Option E (12000) are excessively high, suggesting a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the pricing per adult and child.