Josh takes 6 hours to paint a room. Margaret can paint the same room in 4 hours. Assuming their individual rates do not change, how long will it take them to paint the room together?
- A. 1.5 hours
- B. 2.4 hours
- C. 4.8 hours
- D. 5 hours
- E. 10 hours
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
Other Related Questions
In a survey of 300 people who were randomly sampled from a well-defined population, 60 said that they read a newspaper daily. If 1,000 people had been randomly sampled from the same population and asked the same question, how many would be expected to say they read a newspaper daily?
- A. 180
- B. 200
- C. 360
- D. 600
- E. 760
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many people would be expected to read a newspaper daily in a larger sample, we first find the proportion from the initial survey. Out of 300 people, 60 read a newspaper daily, resulting in a proportion of 60/300 = 0.2 or 20%. Applying this proportion to a sample of 1,000 people, we calculate 20% of 1,000, which is 200. Therefore, option B (200) is the expected number. Other options are incorrect as follows: - A (180) underestimates the proportion. - C (360) overestimates, assuming a higher reading rate. - D (600) and E (760) are significantly higher, suggesting an unrealistic increase in readership.
To determine how many people would be expected to read a newspaper daily in a larger sample, we first find the proportion from the initial survey. Out of 300 people, 60 read a newspaper daily, resulting in a proportion of 60/300 = 0.2 or 20%. Applying this proportion to a sample of 1,000 people, we calculate 20% of 1,000, which is 200. Therefore, option B (200) is the expected number. Other options are incorrect as follows: - A (180) underestimates the proportion. - C (360) overestimates, assuming a higher reading rate. - D (600) and E (760) are significantly higher, suggesting an unrealistic increase in readership.
Which of the following expressions is equivalent to: 1200 × (5 × 10â·)?
- A. 12×10¹â°
- B. 6.0×10¹â°
- C. 6.0×10¹¹
- D. 7.2×10¹³
- E. 9.4×10¹â´
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find an equivalent expression for \( 1200 \times (5 \times 10^n) \), we first simplify \( 1200 \) as \( 1.2 \times 10^3 \). Thus, the expression becomes \( 1.2 \times 10^3 \times 5 \times 10^n = 6.0 \times 10^{3+n} \). Option A incorrectly simplifies the coefficient and exponent. Option C miscalculates the exponent, not aligning with the original multiplication. Option D has an incorrect coefficient and exponent combination. Option E also miscalculates the coefficient and exponent. Therefore, only option B accurately reflects the simplified expression.
To find an equivalent expression for \( 1200 \times (5 \times 10^n) \), we first simplify \( 1200 \) as \( 1.2 \times 10^3 \). Thus, the expression becomes \( 1.2 \times 10^3 \times 5 \times 10^n = 6.0 \times 10^{3+n} \). Option A incorrectly simplifies the coefficient and exponent. Option C miscalculates the exponent, not aligning with the original multiplication. Option D has an incorrect coefficient and exponent combination. Option E also miscalculates the coefficient and exponent. Therefore, only option B accurately reflects the simplified expression.
The number of years the employee has been employed by the city is at least 25 years. The sum of the employee's age and number of years employed by the city is at least 90 years. Larry has been employed by the city since his 38th birthday. Assuming he continues to work for the city, at what age will he first qualify for full retirement benefits?
- A. 52
- B. 55
- C. 62
- D. 63
- E. 64
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: E
To qualify for full retirement benefits, Larry must be at least 25 years employed and have a combined age and years of service of at least 90 years. Since he started working at age 38, he will reach 25 years of employment at age 63. At that point, his age (63) plus his years of service (25) totals 88, which does not meet the 90-year requirement. At age 64, he will have 26 years of service, bringing the total to 90 years (64 + 26), thus meeting both criteria. Options A (52), B (55), and C (62) do not allow for 25 years of service, while D (63) fails to meet the age and service sum requirement.
To qualify for full retirement benefits, Larry must be at least 25 years employed and have a combined age and years of service of at least 90 years. Since he started working at age 38, he will reach 25 years of employment at age 63. At that point, his age (63) plus his years of service (25) totals 88, which does not meet the 90-year requirement. At age 64, he will have 26 years of service, bringing the total to 90 years (64 + 26), thus meeting both criteria. Options A (52), B (55), and C (62) do not allow for 25 years of service, while D (63) fails to meet the age and service sum requirement.
In tennis, a player has two chances to serve the ball successfully. Tamara is successful 70% of the time on her first serve. Tamara is successful 80% of the time on her second serve. What percentage of the time is Tamara not successful on her first serve but successful on her second serve?
- A. 5%
- B. 14%
- C. 24%
- D. 50%
- E. 56%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the percentage of time Tamara is not successful on her first serve but successful on her second serve, first calculate the probability of her missing the first serve, which is 30% (100% - 70%). Next, multiply this by the probability of her succeeding on the second serve, which is 80%. Thus, the calculation is 0.30 (failure on first serve) x 0.80 (success on second serve) = 0.24, or 24%. Option A (5%) underestimates the failure rate. Option C (24%) is the correct calculation but misrepresents the context. Option D (50%) assumes equal success rates, which is inaccurate. Option E (56%) incorrectly adds probabilities instead of multiplying them, leading to an inflated figure.
To determine the percentage of time Tamara is not successful on her first serve but successful on her second serve, first calculate the probability of her missing the first serve, which is 30% (100% - 70%). Next, multiply this by the probability of her succeeding on the second serve, which is 80%. Thus, the calculation is 0.30 (failure on first serve) x 0.80 (success on second serve) = 0.24, or 24%. Option A (5%) underestimates the failure rate. Option C (24%) is the correct calculation but misrepresents the context. Option D (50%) assumes equal success rates, which is inaccurate. Option E (56%) incorrectly adds probabilities instead of multiplying them, leading to an inflated figure.