Various species of birds from the genus Agaporis possess differing behaviors. These behaviors
differ in a way that can be used to infer how the species are related and how they have evolved
over time.
For example, the three lovebird species considered to be the most primitive all build simple nests
in preexisting cavities. The three middle species all build elaborate nests with tops, and one even
digs out a cavity for the nest. The four modern species build cuplike nests: These nests are more
complex than those built by the primitive species but less complex than those built by the middle
species.
William Dilger conducted an investigation to show that the nest-building behaviors of these birds
were genetic rather than learned behaviors. In his investigation, Dilger used two different species
of lovebird that readily mate with each other-Fischer's lovebird and the peach-faced lovebird.
Fischer's lovebird is a species of moder lovebird while the peach-faced lovebird is a slightly more
primitive species.
Fischer's lovebird carries small pieces of nesting material in its beak. The small size of the nesting
material is the reason for the simpler cuplike nests of Fischer's lovebird. The peach-faced lovebird
cuts long strips of nesting material, which is then tucked into the feathers on the back of the bird.
These long strips of nesting material will often fall out of the bird's feathers. However, the long
strips of material allow the peach-faced lovebird to build an elaborate nest.
The hybrid offspring of these two species has difficulty building nests. The hybrid offspring will cut
long strips of material like its peach-faced parent. However, the hybrid offspring will attempt to
carry the material in its beak and have difficulty flying. If it does attempt to place the material in
the feathers of its back, the material falls out because the bird does not properly secure the
material in its feathers.
According to the passage, which statement about hybrid lovebirds is true?
- A. Nest-building behavior can be used to determine evolutionary relationships between lovebird species.
- B. Hybrid lovebirds use nest-building material in ways they learn from the parents.
- C. Nest-building behavior in hybrid lovebirds is a mixture of the parents' behaviors.
- D. Hybrid lovebirds build complex nests using smaller pieces of nest-building material.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Hybrid lovebirds exhibit nest-building behavior that reflects a combination of their parents' distinct styles, showcasing the influence of both species in their hybrid traits. This blending of behaviors illustrates how hybridization can lead to unique adaptations. Option A is incorrect as the passage does not indicate that nest-building behavior is a reliable indicator of evolutionary relationships. Option B is misleading; while learning from parents is important, the focus is on the integration of behaviors rather than direct imitation. Option D is inaccurate; the passage does not mention the complexity of nests or the size of materials used, making this statement unsupported.
Hybrid lovebirds exhibit nest-building behavior that reflects a combination of their parents' distinct styles, showcasing the influence of both species in their hybrid traits. This blending of behaviors illustrates how hybridization can lead to unique adaptations. Option A is incorrect as the passage does not indicate that nest-building behavior is a reliable indicator of evolutionary relationships. Option B is misleading; while learning from parents is important, the focus is on the integration of behaviors rather than direct imitation. Option D is inaccurate; the passage does not mention the complexity of nests or the size of materials used, making this statement unsupported.
Other Related Questions
The chemical composition and energy density of four fuels are shown in the table. Ethane, which has a chemical composition of C2H6, is also a fuel. What is the predicted energy density of ethane?
- A. 45 MJ/kg
- B. 42 MJ/kg
- C. 52 MJ/kg
- D. 48 MJ/kg
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the predicted energy density of ethane (C2H6), one can analyze its molecular structure and compare it to the energy densities of similar hydrocarbons listed in the table. Ethane, being an alkane, typically has a higher energy density due to its saturated carbon-hydrogen bonds. Option A (45 MJ/kg) is lower than expected for alkanes of similar size. Option B (42 MJ/kg) underestimates the energy density, as it does not align with the general trend for hydrocarbons. Option D (48 MJ/kg) is closer but still below the typical range for ethane. Thus, option C (52 MJ/kg) aligns with the expected energy density for ethane, reflecting its molecular composition and energy potential.
To determine the predicted energy density of ethane (C2H6), one can analyze its molecular structure and compare it to the energy densities of similar hydrocarbons listed in the table. Ethane, being an alkane, typically has a higher energy density due to its saturated carbon-hydrogen bonds. Option A (45 MJ/kg) is lower than expected for alkanes of similar size. Option B (42 MJ/kg) underestimates the energy density, as it does not align with the general trend for hydrocarbons. Option D (48 MJ/kg) is closer but still below the typical range for ethane. Thus, option C (52 MJ/kg) aligns with the expected energy density for ethane, reflecting its molecular composition and energy potential.
The cladogram shows the relatedness of several organisms based on shared characteristics. Which characteristic separates catfish from frogs?
- A. Suborbital fenestra
- B. Amniotic egg
- C. Four limbs
- D. Bony skeleton
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The presence of an amniotic egg is a key characteristic that distinguishes frogs from catfish. Frogs, as amphibians, undergo a life cycle that includes an aquatic larval stage, while catfish, as fish, do not produce amniotic eggs and instead lay eggs in water. Option A, suborbital fenestra, relates to skull structure and is not a defining characteristic that separates these groups. Option C, four limbs, applies to frogs but not to catfish, which possess fins instead. Option D, bony skeleton, is present in both groups, making it an insufficient distinguishing trait.
The presence of an amniotic egg is a key characteristic that distinguishes frogs from catfish. Frogs, as amphibians, undergo a life cycle that includes an aquatic larval stage, while catfish, as fish, do not produce amniotic eggs and instead lay eggs in water. Option A, suborbital fenestra, relates to skull structure and is not a defining characteristic that separates these groups. Option C, four limbs, applies to frogs but not to catfish, which possess fins instead. Option D, bony skeleton, is present in both groups, making it an insufficient distinguishing trait.
If these results correctly predict the performance of this kneepad design, what is the probability that one of the kneepads will require a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure?
- A. 53%
- B. 22%
- C. 75%
- D. 25%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the probability of a kneepad requiring a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure, we analyze the data provided. The correct option, 25%, indicates that one-fourth of the kneepads are expected to fail under this force, aligning with statistical predictions for this design. Option A (53%) overestimates the likelihood, suggesting more than half will fail, which is not supported by the data. Option B (22%) underestimates the probability, indicating fewer kneepads will fail than expected. Option C (75%) is excessively high, implying a significant majority would fail, which contradicts the predicted performance. Thus, 25% accurately reflects the failure rate at this force threshold.
To determine the probability of a kneepad requiring a force of 145 N or greater to cause failure, we analyze the data provided. The correct option, 25%, indicates that one-fourth of the kneepads are expected to fail under this force, aligning with statistical predictions for this design. Option A (53%) overestimates the likelihood, suggesting more than half will fail, which is not supported by the data. Option B (22%) underestimates the probability, indicating fewer kneepads will fail than expected. Option C (75%) is excessively high, implying a significant majority would fail, which contradicts the predicted performance. Thus, 25% accurately reflects the failure rate at this force threshold.
Why is the conclusion about gene variation among cheetahs from Sommer's research more valid than the conclusion from O'Brien's research?
- A. Sommer's research was conducted more recently than O'Brien's
- B. Sommer's research used a different population of cheetahs than O'Brien's
- C. Sommer's conclusion is about disease response, while O'Brien's is about skin grafts.
- D. Sommer's conclusion is based on examining the genes, while O'Brien's conclusion is based on acceptance of a skin graft.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.
Sommer's conclusion is more valid as it directly examines gene variation, providing a clearer understanding of genetic factors influencing traits. This direct analysis allows for more reliable insights into gene functionality. In contrast, O'Brien's research focuses on skin graft acceptance, which, while informative, does not provide the same depth of genetic examination. Option A is incorrect as recency does not inherently validate research findings. Option B is misleading; differing populations may affect findings but do not necessarily validate one conclusion over another. Option C misrepresents the focus of the studies; both are relevant but differ in application rather than validity.