This table shows the numbers of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents in the 112th session of the U.S. Congress in 2011.
Assuming that the majority of senators and representatives voted along party lines, which conclusion about the U.S. government in 2011 does the table support?
- A. The party that passed more legislation could be anticipated.
- B. The party that would win the next presidential election could be predicted.
- C. Party divisions were a challenge to the legislative process.
- D. Party affiliations are a requirement for congressional membership.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The data suggests that party divisions significantly impacted the legislative process in 2011, indicating that partisan alignment often hindered bipartisan cooperation. Option A incorrectly implies that the quantity of legislation passed directly correlates with party strength, which is not supported by the information. Option B assumes a direct link between legislative success and electoral outcomes, which cannot be inferred from party voting patterns alone. Option D misrepresents the nature of congressional membership, as party affiliation is not a formal requirement but rather a common practice among members.
The data suggests that party divisions significantly impacted the legislative process in 2011, indicating that partisan alignment often hindered bipartisan cooperation. Option A incorrectly implies that the quantity of legislation passed directly correlates with party strength, which is not supported by the information. Option B assumes a direct link between legislative success and electoral outcomes, which cannot be inferred from party voting patterns alone. Option D misrepresents the nature of congressional membership, as party affiliation is not a formal requirement but rather a common practice among members.
Other Related Questions
Which technology mentioned in the passage was the first one invented by Edison?
- A. vote recorder
- B. motion-picture camera
- C. electric light bulb
- D. phonograph
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The vote recorder was the first technology invented by Edison, designed to streamline the voting process. This innovation predates his more famous inventions. The motion-picture camera (B) and electric light bulb (C) came later, showcasing Edison's evolution as an inventor. The phonograph (D), although significant in audio technology, was also developed after the vote recorder. Understanding the chronological order of these inventions highlights Edison's early contributions to technology and their impact on society.
The vote recorder was the first technology invented by Edison, designed to streamline the voting process. This innovation predates his more famous inventions. The motion-picture camera (B) and electric light bulb (C) came later, showcasing Edison's evolution as an inventor. The phonograph (D), although significant in audio technology, was also developed after the vote recorder. Understanding the chronological order of these inventions highlights Edison's early contributions to technology and their impact on society.
Which event counters the viewpoint expressed in the newspaper excerpt that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights?
- A. the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments
- B. the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation
- C. the founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
- D. the start of the Great Migration
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) directly counters the viewpoint that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights. Established in 1909, the NAACP actively fought for civil rights through legal challenges, advocacy, and public education, demonstrating a strong commitment to defending their rights. Option A, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, although significant, primarily established legal rights rather than showcasing active defense. Option B, the Emancipation Proclamation, ended slavery but did not directly address civil rights activism. Option D, the Great Migration, reflects a movement for better opportunities but does not specifically illustrate organized efforts to defend civil rights.
The founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) directly counters the viewpoint that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights. Established in 1909, the NAACP actively fought for civil rights through legal challenges, advocacy, and public education, demonstrating a strong commitment to defending their rights. Option A, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, although significant, primarily established legal rights rather than showcasing active defense. Option B, the Emancipation Proclamation, ended slavery but did not directly address civil rights activism. Option D, the Great Migration, reflects a movement for better opportunities but does not specifically illustrate organized efforts to defend civil rights.
What is the mean number of people who became legal residents of the United States during this five-year period?
- A. 1,119,823
- B. 223,504
- C. 5,599,113
- D. 1,107,126
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the mean number of legal residents over the five-year period, one must sum the total number of residents and divide by five. The correct calculation yields a mean of 1,119,823, reflecting the average annual influx. Option B (223,504) represents a miscalculation, likely reflecting a single year's data rather than an average. Option C (5,599,113) incorrectly totals the residents without division, suggesting a cumulative number rather than an average. Option D (1,107,126) is close but does not accurately reflect the mean, indicating a minor arithmetic error.
To determine the mean number of legal residents over the five-year period, one must sum the total number of residents and divide by five. The correct calculation yields a mean of 1,119,823, reflecting the average annual influx. Option B (223,504) represents a miscalculation, likely reflecting a single year's data rather than an average. Option C (5,599,113) incorrectly totals the residents without division, suggesting a cumulative number rather than an average. Option D (1,107,126) is close but does not accurately reflect the mean, indicating a minor arithmetic error.
According to this information, which philosopher would most likely support the presidential power to appoint federal judges with the consent of the U.S. Senate?
- A. Thomas Hobbes
- B. Baron de Montesquieu
- C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- D. John Locke
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.