If the length of a rectangle is increased by 30% and the width of the same rectangle is decreased by 30%, what is the effect on the area of the rectangle?
- A. It is increased by 60%.
- B. It is unchanged.
- C. It is decreased by 15%.
- D. It is decreased by 9%.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Increasing the length of a rectangle by 30% results in a new length of 1.3L, while decreasing the width by 30% gives a new width of 0.7W. The new area can be calculated as A' = (1.3L)(0.7W) = 0.91LW, indicating a decrease in area. Option A is incorrect because a 60% increase does not occur; the area actually decreases. Option B is wrong as the area changes due to the modifications in dimensions. Option C suggests a decrease of 15%, which miscalculates the area change. The area decreases by 9%, confirming the effect of the opposing percentage changes in length and width.
Increasing the length of a rectangle by 30% results in a new length of 1.3L, while decreasing the width by 30% gives a new width of 0.7W. The new area can be calculated as A' = (1.3L)(0.7W) = 0.91LW, indicating a decrease in area. Option A is incorrect because a 60% increase does not occur; the area actually decreases. Option B is wrong as the area changes due to the modifications in dimensions. Option C suggests a decrease of 15%, which miscalculates the area change. The area decreases by 9%, confirming the effect of the opposing percentage changes in length and width.
Other Related Questions
Trevani bought a book. She paid a total of $13.50, including 8% sales tax. How much tax did Trevani pay on the book?
- A. $0.96
- B. $1.00
- C. $1.04
- D. $1.08
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the amount of sales tax Trevani paid, first determine the price before tax. The total amount paid, $13.50, includes an 8% tax. To find the pre-tax amount, divide the total by 1.08 (which accounts for the original price plus tax): $13.50 ÷ 1.08 = $12.50. Next, calculate the sales tax by subtracting the pre-tax amount from the total: $13.50 - $12.50 = $1.00. This confirms that Trevani paid $1.00 in tax. - Option A ($0.96) is incorrect as it underestimates the tax. - Option C ($1.04) slightly overestimates the tax. - Option D ($1.08) incorrectly assumes the total is all tax without accounting for the book's price.
To find the amount of sales tax Trevani paid, first determine the price before tax. The total amount paid, $13.50, includes an 8% tax. To find the pre-tax amount, divide the total by 1.08 (which accounts for the original price plus tax): $13.50 ÷ 1.08 = $12.50. Next, calculate the sales tax by subtracting the pre-tax amount from the total: $13.50 - $12.50 = $1.00. This confirms that Trevani paid $1.00 in tax. - Option A ($0.96) is incorrect as it underestimates the tax. - Option C ($1.04) slightly overestimates the tax. - Option D ($1.08) incorrectly assumes the total is all tax without accounting for the book's price.
Valentina attends several meetings each day, as shown in the table below. Which of the following describes this pattern?
- A. The number of meetings increases by the same amount each day.
- B. The number of meetings decreases by the same amount each day.
- C. Each day, the number of meetings increases by the same percent over the previous day's number of meetings.
- D. Each day, the number of meetings decreases by the same percent over the previous day's number of meetings.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The pattern of Valentina's meetings indicates that the number of meetings increases by a consistent percentage each day, reflecting exponential growth. This is evident when comparing the daily totals, which show a proportional rise rather than a fixed increase. Option A is incorrect because it suggests a linear growth, where the same number of meetings is added daily, which is not observed. Option B implies a consistent decrease, which contradicts the observed increase in meetings. Option D also misrepresents the data by suggesting a percentage decrease, which does not align with the trend of increasing meetings.
The pattern of Valentina's meetings indicates that the number of meetings increases by a consistent percentage each day, reflecting exponential growth. This is evident when comparing the daily totals, which show a proportional rise rather than a fixed increase. Option A is incorrect because it suggests a linear growth, where the same number of meetings is added daily, which is not observed. Option B implies a consistent decrease, which contradicts the observed increase in meetings. Option D also misrepresents the data by suggesting a percentage decrease, which does not align with the trend of increasing meetings.
Malia collected information about whether the members of the 36 households on her block subscribed to cable television and home phone services. Her results are shown in the table below.\nIf a household on Malia's block is selected at random and does subscribe to cable television, what is the probability the members of the household also subscribe to home phone service?
- A. 14/18
- B. 14/26
- C. 18/36
- D. 14/36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the probability that a household subscribes to home phone service given that it subscribes to cable television, we focus on the relevant subset of households. Malia found 18 households that subscribe to cable, out of which 14 also subscribe to home phone service. Thus, the probability is calculated as the number of households with both services (14) divided by the total number of households with cable (18), resulting in 14/18. Option B (14/26) incorrectly uses the total number of households with home phone service instead of just those with cable. Option C (18/36) misinterprets the probability as a ratio of all households rather than those who subscribe to cable. Option D (14/36) inaccurately represents the total number of households instead of focusing on the cable subscribers.
To determine the probability that a household subscribes to home phone service given that it subscribes to cable television, we focus on the relevant subset of households. Malia found 18 households that subscribe to cable, out of which 14 also subscribe to home phone service. Thus, the probability is calculated as the number of households with both services (14) divided by the total number of households with cable (18), resulting in 14/18. Option B (14/26) incorrectly uses the total number of households with home phone service instead of just those with cable. Option C (18/36) misinterprets the probability as a ratio of all households rather than those who subscribe to cable. Option D (14/36) inaccurately represents the total number of households instead of focusing on the cable subscribers.
0.034÷(10)^(-1) =
- A. 0.0034
- B. 0.034
- C. 0.34
- D. 3.4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve 0.034 ÷ (10)^(-1), we first recognize that (10)^(-1) is equivalent to 1/10 or 0.1. Dividing by 0.1 is the same as multiplying by 10. Therefore, 0.034 ÷ 0.1 equals 0.034 × 10, which results in 0.34. Option A (0.0034) misinterprets the division, mistakenly moving the decimal too far left. Option B (0.034) fails to account for the division by 0.1, leaving the original number unchanged. Option D (3.4) incorrectly multiplies instead of dividing, moving the decimal point too far right. Thus, the only accurate calculation leads to 0.34.
To solve 0.034 ÷ (10)^(-1), we first recognize that (10)^(-1) is equivalent to 1/10 or 0.1. Dividing by 0.1 is the same as multiplying by 10. Therefore, 0.034 ÷ 0.1 equals 0.034 × 10, which results in 0.34. Option A (0.0034) misinterprets the division, mistakenly moving the decimal too far left. Option B (0.034) fails to account for the division by 0.1, leaving the original number unchanged. Option D (3.4) incorrectly multiplies instead of dividing, moving the decimal point too far right. Thus, the only accurate calculation leads to 0.34.