Marco won a trophy each of the three times he competed in the junior tennis tournament, but still the first prize eluded him.
- A. eluded
- B. alluded
- C. elided
- D. allied
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
In this context, "eluded" means that the first prize was out of Marco's reach despite his successes, which fits the sentence perfectly. Option B, "alluded," refers to making an indirect reference, which does not apply here. Option C, "elided," means to omit or leave out, which does not convey the intended meaning of something being out of reach. Option D, "allied," means to join or unite, which is irrelevant in this context. Thus, "eluded" accurately captures the sense of a goal that remains unattained despite effort.
In this context, "eluded" means that the first prize was out of Marco's reach despite his successes, which fits the sentence perfectly. Option B, "alluded," refers to making an indirect reference, which does not apply here. Option C, "elided," means to omit or leave out, which does not convey the intended meaning of something being out of reach. Option D, "allied," means to join or unite, which is irrelevant in this context. Thus, "eluded" accurately captures the sense of a goal that remains unattained despite effort.
Other Related Questions
Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? Some researchers have cited this evidence as it made an argument that MSA hunters were less skilled than LSA hunters.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. evidence and were making
- C. evidence, having made
- D. evidence to make
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.
Option D clarifies the relationship between the evidence and the argument, indicating that the evidence was used to support the claim about MSA hunters. This creates a clear and logical connection. Option A retains the original phrasing, which is vague and awkward, failing to effectively convey the intended meaning. Option B uses "and were making," which introduces unnecessary complexity and shifts the focus away from the evidence itself. Option C's "having made" implies a completed action that does not align with the ongoing nature of the argument being presented.
The retired government official spoke _______ about foreign policy and international trade
- A. as knowing
- B. in knowledge
- C. knowledgeably
- D. knowledgeable
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The sentence requires an adverb to describe how the retired government official spoke. Option C, "knowledgeably," correctly functions as an adverb, indicating that the official spoke with knowledge about foreign policy and international trade. Option A, "as knowing," is grammatically incorrect and does not convey the intended meaning. Option B, "in knowledge," is awkward and does not fit the context of how someone speaks. Option D, "knowledgeable," is an adjective and would not appropriately modify the verb "spoke." Thus, C is the only option that fits both grammatically and contextually.
The sentence requires an adverb to describe how the retired government official spoke. Option C, "knowledgeably," correctly functions as an adverb, indicating that the official spoke with knowledge about foreign policy and international trade. Option A, "as knowing," is grammatically incorrect and does not convey the intended meaning. Option B, "in knowledge," is awkward and does not fit the context of how someone speaks. Option D, "knowledgeable," is an adjective and would not appropriately modify the verb "spoke." Thus, C is the only option that fits both grammatically and contextually.
In context, which would be the best place to insert the following sentence? I took guitar lessons and practiced day and night.
- A. After sentence 9
- B. After sentence 11
- C. After sentence 15
- D. After sentence 16
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Inserting the sentence after sentence 9 effectively highlights a pivotal moment in the narrative, emphasizing the character's dedication to mastering the guitar. This placement allows for a smooth transition into the subsequent discussion of progress and challenges faced. Option B, after sentence 11, disrupts the flow, as it focuses on a different aspect of the character's journey. Option C, after sentence 15, feels too late, as it misses the opportunity to connect the dedication to earlier events. Option D, after sentence 16, would confuse the reader, as it follows a conclusion rather than enhancing the buildup of the character's commitment.
Inserting the sentence after sentence 9 effectively highlights a pivotal moment in the narrative, emphasizing the character's dedication to mastering the guitar. This placement allows for a smooth transition into the subsequent discussion of progress and challenges faced. Option B, after sentence 11, disrupts the flow, as it focuses on a different aspect of the character's journey. Option C, after sentence 15, feels too late, as it misses the opportunity to connect the dedication to earlier events. Option D, after sentence 16, would confuse the reader, as it follows a conclusion rather than enhancing the buildup of the character's commitment.
Which change is needed in the fourth paragraph?
- A. In sentence 15, change 'immanent' to 'eminent'
- B. In sentence 15, change 'dual' to 'duel'
- C. In sentence 16, change 'inspire' to 'aspire'
- D. In sentence 17, change 'proceeded' to 'preceded'
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A is essential as it corrects a misused term; "immanent" refers to something inherent, while "eminent" describes someone prominent or distinguished, which fits the context better. Option B is incorrect because "dual" (meaning twofold) is appropriate in the context, while "duel" (a contest between two) does not convey the intended meaning. Option C misplaces "inspire" as it suggests motivating someone, whereas "aspire" (to aim for something) aligns with the intended message of ambition. Option D erroneously uses "proceeded," which implies moving forward, instead of "preceded," which correctly indicates something that came before.
Option A is essential as it corrects a misused term; "immanent" refers to something inherent, while "eminent" describes someone prominent or distinguished, which fits the context better. Option B is incorrect because "dual" (meaning twofold) is appropriate in the context, while "duel" (a contest between two) does not convey the intended meaning. Option C misplaces "inspire" as it suggests motivating someone, whereas "aspire" (to aim for something) aligns with the intended message of ambition. Option D erroneously uses "proceeded," which implies moving forward, instead of "preceded," which correctly indicates something that came before.