(1) When selecting her ingredients, a chef has a seemingly small—but nonetheless consequential—choice: she can patronize a conventional grocery store, or she can turn to a nearby farm. (2) While a store may provide benefits such as a broad range of options, a local farm can offer major advantages of its own. (3) When chefs and other consumers choose local products rather than goods that have been transported across long distances to chain stores, they can enjoy better prices while supporting the local economy. (4) Shoppers buying locally can often reap the benefits of competitive prices on goods due to reduced transport costs. (5) For example, one researcher found that the ingredients of a common Swedish breakfast—consisting of items like bread, coffee, and orange juice—were probably shipped a distance roughly equivalent to Earth’s circumference, and shipping can be costly. (6) On the other hand, buying ingredients from local farms may reduce transportation costs significantly, thereby increasing savings for the consumer. (7) Research also suggests that small local farms collectively can produce a large quantity of food; a big supply can, in turn, translate into lower prices. (8) Small farms gain these yields in part through efficient land use. (9) One study found that in Brazil, nearly five million small farms—which occupy only about 30 percent of the country's total agricultural land—are able to produce most of the beans the country needs. (10) The law of supply and demand suggests that if local farmers can produce more food than large farms, consumers may pay less. (11) Lower prices are not the only potential advantage of buying locally. (12) When consumers shop nearby, they are helping to ensure that local farms and businesses thrive. (13) The Brazilian bean farmers, for example, can continue to build strong local economies and do not have to migrate to commercial farms to find work. (14) What will our chef choose? (15) Deciding where to shop can be enigmatic, as both the store and the farm have their attractions. (16) The local option often makes the most sense, however. (17) It is good for the chef’s wallet, the neighborhood farmer’s bottom line, and, in the end, the community’s economic vigor.
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 2 (reproduced below)? Supposing a store may provide benefits such as a broad range of options, a local farm can offer major advantages of its own.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. When a store supposes it
- C. Although a store
- D. A store though
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C, "Although a store," introduces a contrast between the benefits of a store and those of a local farm, enhancing the sentence's clarity. This structure effectively highlights the unique advantages of local farms, making the comparison more impactful. Option A maintains the original phrasing but lacks the contrast needed for a stronger argument. Option B, "When a store supposes it," introduces ambiguity and weakens the sentence by suggesting uncertainty rather than presenting a comparison. Option D, "A store though," is informal and does not establish a clear relationship between the two subjects, ultimately reducing the sentence's effectiveness.
Option C, "Although a store," introduces a contrast between the benefits of a store and those of a local farm, enhancing the sentence's clarity. This structure effectively highlights the unique advantages of local farms, making the comparison more impactful. Option A maintains the original phrasing but lacks the contrast needed for a stronger argument. Option B, "When a store supposes it," introduces ambiguity and weakens the sentence by suggesting uncertainty rather than presenting a comparison. Option D, "A store though," is informal and does not establish a clear relationship between the two subjects, ultimately reducing the sentence's effectiveness.
Other Related Questions
Which is the best version of the underlined portion of sentence 6 (reproduced below)? More recent discoveries of sauropod fossils in locations around the world have confirmed that these resilient animals, did indeed walk the earth for millions of years.
- A. (as it is now)
- B. that, these resilient animals
- C. that these resilient animals.
- D. that these resilient animals
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Option D is the best choice as it eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smooth and grammatically correct sentence. The phrase "that these resilient animals" flows naturally and maintains clarity. Option A retains the comma, which incorrectly separates the subject from the verb, leading to a fragmented structure. Option B includes an unnecessary comma after "that," disrupting the sentence's flow. Option C, while similar to D, incorrectly ends with a period, making it incomplete and affecting the overall coherence of the sentence.
Option D is the best choice as it eliminates unnecessary punctuation, creating a smooth and grammatically correct sentence. The phrase "that these resilient animals" flows naturally and maintains clarity. Option A retains the comma, which incorrectly separates the subject from the verb, leading to a fragmented structure. Option B includes an unnecessary comma after "that," disrupting the sentence's flow. Option C, while similar to D, incorrectly ends with a period, making it incomplete and affecting the overall coherence of the sentence.
In context, 'Telemundo' and 'Ms. magazine' serve as examples of media that:
- A. Devised similar marketing techniques
- B. Were created by the same media visionary
- C. Underwent profound changes as a result of Johnson's work
- D. Were designed to appeal to particular groups of consumers
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Telemundo and Ms. magazine both target specific audiences, making option D the most accurate choice. Telemundo caters primarily to Spanish-speaking viewers, while Ms. magazine focuses on feminist issues and women’s rights, appealing to a distinct demographic. Option A is incorrect as there is no indication that both used similar marketing techniques. Option B is misleading; the two were not created by the same visionary, as they emerged from different cultural and social contexts. Option C is also inaccurate; while Johnson's work may have influenced media, it did not specifically lead to profound changes in either outlet.
Telemundo and Ms. magazine both target specific audiences, making option D the most accurate choice. Telemundo caters primarily to Spanish-speaking viewers, while Ms. magazine focuses on feminist issues and women’s rights, appealing to a distinct demographic. Option A is incorrect as there is no indication that both used similar marketing techniques. Option B is misleading; the two were not created by the same visionary, as they emerged from different cultural and social contexts. Option C is also inaccurate; while Johnson's work may have influenced media, it did not specifically lead to profound changes in either outlet.
Which is the best way to revise and combine sentences 3 and 4 (reproduced below)? Lorca was the oldest son of a wealthy landowner. He studied literature and law at the University of Granada before turning to writing full-time.
- A. Lorca was the oldest son of a wealthy landowner, studied literature and law at the University of Granada before turning to writing full-time.
- B. The oldest son of a wealthy landowner, Lorca studied literature and law at the University of Granada before turning to writing full-time.
- C. Lorca, the oldest son of a wealthy landowner, studying literature and law at the University of Granada before turning to writing full-time.
- D. The oldest son of a wealthy landowner who studied literature and law at the University of Granada, Lorca then turning to writing full-time.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B effectively combines the two sentences by placing the subject, Lorca, at the beginning and clearly linking his identity to his actions. This structure maintains clarity and coherence, allowing readers to easily follow the progression of ideas. Option A lacks a conjunction, resulting in a sentence fragment that does not convey a complete thought. Option C incorrectly uses "studying," which creates a grammatical error by failing to connect the clauses properly. Option D introduces unnecessary complexity with "who studied," and the phrase "Lorca then turning" is awkward and grammatically incorrect. Thus, option B stands out as the most coherent and grammatically sound choice.
Option B effectively combines the two sentences by placing the subject, Lorca, at the beginning and clearly linking his identity to his actions. This structure maintains clarity and coherence, allowing readers to easily follow the progression of ideas. Option A lacks a conjunction, resulting in a sentence fragment that does not convey a complete thought. Option C incorrectly uses "studying," which creates a grammatical error by failing to connect the clauses properly. Option D introduces unnecessary complexity with "who studied," and the phrase "Lorca then turning" is awkward and grammatically incorrect. Thus, option B stands out as the most coherent and grammatically sound choice.
Which choice best replaces the underlined portion in sentence 6 (reproduced below) to suggest that, for a time, people were completely caught up with news of the Leonid meteor shower? In the center of the quilt, the 'falling of the stars' illustrates the hours-long Leonid meteor shower that interested people on November 13, 1833.
- A. affected
- B. enthralled
- C. involved
- D. worried
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The term "enthralled" effectively conveys a sense of deep fascination and engagement, suggesting that people were completely captivated by the Leonid meteor shower. Option A, "affected," lacks the intensity and emotional connection implied in the context; it merely indicates a change rather than a strong interest. Option C, "involved," suggests participation but does not capture the sense of wonder that the meteor shower inspired. Option D, "worried," introduces an inappropriate negative connotation, as the context is one of excitement and awe, not concern.
The term "enthralled" effectively conveys a sense of deep fascination and engagement, suggesting that people were completely captivated by the Leonid meteor shower. Option A, "affected," lacks the intensity and emotional connection implied in the context; it merely indicates a change rather than a strong interest. Option C, "involved," suggests participation but does not capture the sense of wonder that the meteor shower inspired. Option D, "worried," introduces an inappropriate negative connotation, as the context is one of excitement and awe, not concern.