Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer:
Certainly! Please provide the question and the options so I can create the rationale for you.
Certainly! Please provide the question and the options so I can create the rationale for you.
Other Related Questions
The chemical composition and energy density of four fuels are shown in the table. Ethane, which has a chemical composition of C2H6, is also a fuel. What is the predicted energy density of ethane?
- A. 45 MJ/kg
- B. 42 MJ/kg
- C. 52 MJ/kg
- D. 48 MJ/kg
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the predicted energy density of ethane (C2H6), one can analyze its molecular structure and compare it to the energy densities of similar hydrocarbons listed in the table. Ethane, being an alkane, typically has a higher energy density due to its saturated carbon-hydrogen bonds. Option A (45 MJ/kg) is lower than expected for alkanes of similar size. Option B (42 MJ/kg) underestimates the energy density, as it does not align with the general trend for hydrocarbons. Option D (48 MJ/kg) is closer but still below the typical range for ethane. Thus, option C (52 MJ/kg) aligns with the expected energy density for ethane, reflecting its molecular composition and energy potential.
To determine the predicted energy density of ethane (C2H6), one can analyze its molecular structure and compare it to the energy densities of similar hydrocarbons listed in the table. Ethane, being an alkane, typically has a higher energy density due to its saturated carbon-hydrogen bonds. Option A (45 MJ/kg) is lower than expected for alkanes of similar size. Option B (42 MJ/kg) underestimates the energy density, as it does not align with the general trend for hydrocarbons. Option D (48 MJ/kg) is closer but still below the typical range for ethane. Thus, option C (52 MJ/kg) aligns with the expected energy density for ethane, reflecting its molecular composition and energy potential.
The cladogram shows the relatedness of several organisms based on shared characteristics. Which characteristic separates catfish from frogs?
- A. Suborbital fenestra
- B. Amniotic egg
- C. Four limbs
- D. Bony skeleton
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The presence of an amniotic egg is a key characteristic that distinguishes frogs from catfish. Frogs, as amphibians, undergo a life cycle that includes an aquatic larval stage, while catfish, as fish, do not produce amniotic eggs and instead lay eggs in water. Option A, suborbital fenestra, relates to skull structure and is not a defining characteristic that separates these groups. Option C, four limbs, applies to frogs but not to catfish, which possess fins instead. Option D, bony skeleton, is present in both groups, making it an insufficient distinguishing trait.
The presence of an amniotic egg is a key characteristic that distinguishes frogs from catfish. Frogs, as amphibians, undergo a life cycle that includes an aquatic larval stage, while catfish, as fish, do not produce amniotic eggs and instead lay eggs in water. Option A, suborbital fenestra, relates to skull structure and is not a defining characteristic that separates these groups. Option C, four limbs, applies to frogs but not to catfish, which possess fins instead. Option D, bony skeleton, is present in both groups, making it an insufficient distinguishing trait.
Which statement describes a weakness of the investigation in the passage?
- A. None of the hypotheses are directly related to the ice core data.
- B. The Greenland ice sheet is far away from the site of the explosion in Russia.
- C. Several of the hypotheses rely on unproven processes or estimated values.
- D. A few micrograms of ammonia is insufficient evidence for a conclusion.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C highlights a significant weakness, as relying on unproven processes or estimated values can lead to unreliable conclusions, undermining the investigation's credibility. Option A is incorrect because hypotheses can be related to data in broader contexts, even if not directly. Option B misrepresents the geographical relevance; distance alone does not invalidate the connection between the ice core data and the explosion. Option D, while suggesting a concern about evidence quantity, does not address the fundamental issue of reliance on unproven processes that can skew the investigation's outcomes.
Option C highlights a significant weakness, as relying on unproven processes or estimated values can lead to unreliable conclusions, undermining the investigation's credibility. Option A is incorrect because hypotheses can be related to data in broader contexts, even if not directly. Option B misrepresents the geographical relevance; distance alone does not invalidate the connection between the ice core data and the explosion. Option D, while suggesting a concern about evidence quantity, does not address the fundamental issue of reliance on unproven processes that can skew the investigation's outcomes.
A 60W light bulb used .48 kilowatt hours of electricity. How long was the light bulb on?
- A. 0.48 hours
- B. 28.8 hours
- C. 0.125 hours
- D. 8 hours
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how long the 60W light bulb was on, we first convert the energy used from kilowatt hours to watt hours: 0.48 kWh equals 480 watt hours. Using the formula: time (hours) = energy (watt hours) / power (watts), we calculate: 480 watt hours / 60 watts = 8 hours. Option A (0.48 hours) underestimates the time significantly. Option B (28.8 hours) incorrectly suggests the bulb was on much longer than the energy consumed allows. Option C (0.125 hours) miscalculates by assuming a much higher power consumption. Only option D accurately reflects the time the bulb was on based on the energy used.
To determine how long the 60W light bulb was on, we first convert the energy used from kilowatt hours to watt hours: 0.48 kWh equals 480 watt hours. Using the formula: time (hours) = energy (watt hours) / power (watts), we calculate: 480 watt hours / 60 watts = 8 hours. Option A (0.48 hours) underestimates the time significantly. Option B (28.8 hours) incorrectly suggests the bulb was on much longer than the energy consumed allows. Option C (0.125 hours) miscalculates by assuming a much higher power consumption. Only option D accurately reflects the time the bulb was on based on the energy used.