Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri. Robert has half as many DVDs as Teri. If Robert has 32 DVDs, how many DVDs does Sienna have?
- A. 4
- B. 16
- C. 64
- D. 256
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many DVDs Sienna has, start with Robert's count. Since Robert has 32 DVDs and he has half as many as Teri, Teri must have 64 DVDs (32 x 2). Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri, so she has 256 DVDs (64 x 4). Option A (4) is incorrect because it underestimates the number of DVDs based on Teri's count. Option B (16) is also incorrect, as it does not align with the calculations derived from Robert's DVDs. Option C (64) mistakenly represents Teri's count rather than Sienna's. Thus, the only valid option reflecting Sienna's total is 256.
To determine how many DVDs Sienna has, start with Robert's count. Since Robert has 32 DVDs and he has half as many as Teri, Teri must have 64 DVDs (32 x 2). Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri, so she has 256 DVDs (64 x 4). Option A (4) is incorrect because it underestimates the number of DVDs based on Teri's count. Option B (16) is also incorrect, as it does not align with the calculations derived from Robert's DVDs. Option C (64) mistakenly represents Teri's count rather than Sienna's. Thus, the only valid option reflecting Sienna's total is 256.
Other Related Questions
John worked at a bookstore for two weeks. The second week he earned 20 percent more than he did the first week. If he earned $300 the second week, how much did he earn the first week?
- A. 240
- B. 250
- C. 280
- D. 380
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine John’s earnings for the first week, we know that his second week earnings were 20% more than the first week. If he earned $300 in the second week, we can calculate his first week earnings by setting up the equation: Let x be the first week’s earnings. Then, x + 0.2x = 300. This simplifies to 1.2x = 300. Dividing both sides by 1.2 gives x = 250. Option A ($240) is too low, as it would not result in a $300 second week. Option C ($280) would imply a second week earning of $336, which exceeds $300. Option D ($380) is also incorrect as it suggests a second week earning of $456. Thus, $250 is the only viable answer.
To determine John’s earnings for the first week, we know that his second week earnings were 20% more than the first week. If he earned $300 in the second week, we can calculate his first week earnings by setting up the equation: Let x be the first week’s earnings. Then, x + 0.2x = 300. This simplifies to 1.2x = 300. Dividing both sides by 1.2 gives x = 250. Option A ($240) is too low, as it would not result in a $300 second week. Option C ($280) would imply a second week earning of $336, which exceeds $300. Option D ($380) is also incorrect as it suggests a second week earning of $456. Thus, $250 is the only viable answer.
7.50 ÷ 0.125 =
- A. 60
- B. 6
- C. 0.6
- D. 1/6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.
6[4 + 2(1 - 3)] =
- B. 20
- C. 24
- D. 48
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the expression 6[4 + 2(1 - 3)], begin by simplifying inside the brackets. The calculation within the parentheses, 1 - 3, equals -2. Next, multiply by 2 to get -4. Now, the expression inside the brackets is 4 - 4, which simplifies to 0. Finally, multiplying 6 by 0 results in 0. Option B (20), C (24), and D (48) arise from miscalculations, such as incorrectly handling the order of operations or not simplifying the expression fully. None of these options account for the zero outcome from the calculations.
To solve the expression 6[4 + 2(1 - 3)], begin by simplifying inside the brackets. The calculation within the parentheses, 1 - 3, equals -2. Next, multiply by 2 to get -4. Now, the expression inside the brackets is 4 - 4, which simplifies to 0. Finally, multiplying 6 by 0 results in 0. Option B (20), C (24), and D (48) arise from miscalculations, such as incorrectly handling the order of operations or not simplifying the expression fully. None of these options account for the zero outcome from the calculations.
6 + 5,1/3 ÷ (6 - 5,1/3) =
- A. 1,1/3
- B. 5,1/3
- C. 16
- D. 17
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve the equation, first evaluate the expression in the parentheses: \(6 - 5\frac{1}{3}\) equals \(6 - \frac{16}{3} = \frac{18}{3} - \frac{16}{3} = \frac{2}{3}\). Next, compute \(5\frac{1}{3}\) as \(\frac{16}{3}\). The equation now reads \(6 + \frac{16}{3} \div \frac{2}{3}\). Dividing \(\frac{16}{3}\) by \(\frac{2}{3}\) gives \(8\). Adding this to \(6\) results in \(14\), leading to the final answer of \(16\). Option A (1\(\frac{1}{3}\)) is incorrect due to miscalculating the operations. Option B (5\(\frac{1}{3}\)) fails to account for the division correctly. Option D (17) mistakenly adds an extra unit instead of properly evaluating the expression.
To solve the equation, first evaluate the expression in the parentheses: \(6 - 5\frac{1}{3}\) equals \(6 - \frac{16}{3} = \frac{18}{3} - \frac{16}{3} = \frac{2}{3}\). Next, compute \(5\frac{1}{3}\) as \(\frac{16}{3}\). The equation now reads \(6 + \frac{16}{3} \div \frac{2}{3}\). Dividing \(\frac{16}{3}\) by \(\frac{2}{3}\) gives \(8\). Adding this to \(6\) results in \(14\), leading to the final answer of \(16\). Option A (1\(\frac{1}{3}\)) is incorrect due to miscalculating the operations. Option B (5\(\frac{1}{3}\)) fails to account for the division correctly. Option D (17) mistakenly adds an extra unit instead of properly evaluating the expression.