Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri. Robert has half as many DVDs as Teri. If Robert has 32 DVDs, how many DVDs does Sienna have?
- A. 4
- B. 16
- C. 64
- D. 256
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many DVDs Sienna has, start with Robert's count. Since Robert has 32 DVDs and he has half as many as Teri, Teri must have 64 DVDs (32 x 2). Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri, so she has 256 DVDs (64 x 4). Option A (4) is incorrect because it underestimates the number of DVDs based on Teri's count. Option B (16) is also incorrect, as it does not align with the calculations derived from Robert's DVDs. Option C (64) mistakenly represents Teri's count rather than Sienna's. Thus, the only valid option reflecting Sienna's total is 256.
To determine how many DVDs Sienna has, start with Robert's count. Since Robert has 32 DVDs and he has half as many as Teri, Teri must have 64 DVDs (32 x 2). Sienna has four times as many DVDs as Teri, so she has 256 DVDs (64 x 4). Option A (4) is incorrect because it underestimates the number of DVDs based on Teri's count. Option B (16) is also incorrect, as it does not align with the calculations derived from Robert's DVDs. Option C (64) mistakenly represents Teri's count rather than Sienna's. Thus, the only valid option reflecting Sienna's total is 256.
Other Related Questions
7.50 ÷ 0.125 =
- A. 60
- B. 6
- C. 0.6
- D. 1/6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.
To solve 7.50 ÷ 0.125, it's helpful to convert the division into a more manageable form. Dividing by 0.125 is the same as multiplying by 8 (since 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8). Therefore, 7.50 × 8 equals 60, confirming option A as the right choice. Option B (6) is incorrect; it underestimates the quotient significantly. Option C (0.6) is also wrong, as it suggests a much smaller result than what is obtained. Lastly, option D (1/6) misrepresents the division entirely, implying a fractional outcome that does not align with the calculations.
John worked at a bookstore for two weeks. The second week he earned 20 percent more than he did the first week. If he earned $300 the second week, how much did he earn the first week?
- A. 240
- B. 250
- C. 280
- D. 380
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine John’s earnings for the first week, we know that his second week earnings were 20% more than the first week. If he earned $300 in the second week, we can calculate his first week earnings by setting up the equation: Let x be the first week’s earnings. Then, x + 0.2x = 300. This simplifies to 1.2x = 300. Dividing both sides by 1.2 gives x = 250. Option A ($240) is too low, as it would not result in a $300 second week. Option C ($280) would imply a second week earning of $336, which exceeds $300. Option D ($380) is also incorrect as it suggests a second week earning of $456. Thus, $250 is the only viable answer.
To determine John’s earnings for the first week, we know that his second week earnings were 20% more than the first week. If he earned $300 in the second week, we can calculate his first week earnings by setting up the equation: Let x be the first week’s earnings. Then, x + 0.2x = 300. This simplifies to 1.2x = 300. Dividing both sides by 1.2 gives x = 250. Option A ($240) is too low, as it would not result in a $300 second week. Option C ($280) would imply a second week earning of $336, which exceeds $300. Option D ($380) is also incorrect as it suggests a second week earning of $456. Thus, $250 is the only viable answer.
3 × (1/2 + 1/3) =
- A. 2,1/2
- B. 2,5/6
- C. 3,1/6
- D. 3,5/6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 3 × (1/2 + 1/3), first find a common denominator for the fractions 1/2 and 1/3, which is 6. This gives us (3/6 + 2/6) = 5/6. Multiplying by 3 results in 3 × (5/6) = 15/6, which simplifies to 2 1/2 (Option A). Option B (2 5/6) incorrectly adds an extra fraction. Option C (3 1/6) miscalculates the multiplication. Option D (3 5/6) also misinterprets the original problem, leading to an incorrect total. Thus, only Option A accurately represents the solution.
To solve 3 × (1/2 + 1/3), first find a common denominator for the fractions 1/2 and 1/3, which is 6. This gives us (3/6 + 2/6) = 5/6. Multiplying by 3 results in 3 × (5/6) = 15/6, which simplifies to 2 1/2 (Option A). Option B (2 5/6) incorrectly adds an extra fraction. Option C (3 1/6) miscalculates the multiplication. Option D (3 5/6) also misinterprets the original problem, leading to an incorrect total. Thus, only Option A accurately represents the solution.
Alexia, Bob, and Comelia recorded the number of pages of books they read last month. Alexia read 135 pages, Bob read 26 pages less than Alexia, and Comelia read 3 and one-half times more pages than Alexia and Bob combined. Which of the following represents the total number of pages that Alexia, Bob, and Comelia read last month?
- A. 3.5(135 + 26)
- B. 3.5[2(135) - 26]
- C. 4.5[2(135) - 26]
- D. 4.5[2(135) + 26]
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of pages read, first calculate Bob's pages: he read 135 - 26 = 109 pages. The combined pages of Alexia and Bob is 135 + 109 = 244 pages. Comelia read 3.5 times this total, resulting in 3.5 × 244. Option A incorrectly uses 135 + 26, which does not account for Bob's actual pages read. Option B mistakenly uses a subtraction instead of addition for the combined total. Option D incorrectly adds Bob's pages instead of using the correct combined total for Comelia's calculation. Thus, C accurately represents the total with 3.5(244), leading to the correct final total.
To determine the total number of pages read, first calculate Bob's pages: he read 135 - 26 = 109 pages. The combined pages of Alexia and Bob is 135 + 109 = 244 pages. Comelia read 3.5 times this total, resulting in 3.5 × 244. Option A incorrectly uses 135 + 26, which does not account for Bob's actual pages read. Option B mistakenly uses a subtraction instead of addition for the combined total. Option D incorrectly adds Bob's pages instead of using the correct combined total for Comelia's calculation. Thus, C accurately represents the total with 3.5(244), leading to the correct final total.