The equation d/f = g represents gallons of gasoline used, g, in terms of distance traveled in miles, d, and fuel efficiency, / miles per gallon of gasoline. Which combination of distance traveled and fuel efficiency uses 3 gallons of gasoline?
- A. 7 miles and 21 miles per gallon
- B. 57 miles and 19 miles per gallon
- C. 23 miles and 20 miles per gallon
- D. 32 miles and 35 miles per gallon
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine which combination uses 3 gallons of gasoline, we can rearrange the equation d/f = g to find d = g * f. For g = 3 gallons, we calculate d for each option. A: 7 miles and 21 mpg results in d = 3 * 21 = 63 miles, which is incorrect. B: 57 miles and 19 mpg gives d = 3 * 19 = 57 miles, matching the distance traveled. C: 23 miles and 20 mpg leads to d = 3 * 20 = 60 miles, which is incorrect. D: 32 miles and 35 mpg results in d = 3 * 35 = 105 miles, which is also incorrect. Only option B correctly satisfies the equation for 3 gallons of gasoline used.
To determine which combination uses 3 gallons of gasoline, we can rearrange the equation d/f = g to find d = g * f. For g = 3 gallons, we calculate d for each option. A: 7 miles and 21 mpg results in d = 3 * 21 = 63 miles, which is incorrect. B: 57 miles and 19 mpg gives d = 3 * 19 = 57 miles, matching the distance traveled. C: 23 miles and 20 mpg leads to d = 3 * 20 = 60 miles, which is incorrect. D: 32 miles and 35 mpg results in d = 3 * 35 = 105 miles, which is also incorrect. Only option B correctly satisfies the equation for 3 gallons of gasoline used.
Other Related Questions
The daily cost, C(x), tor a company to produce x microscopes is given by the equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. What is the cost of producing 50 microscopes?
- A. $41,250
- B. $360.50
- C. $15,525
- D. $825
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
To find the cost of producing 50 microscopes, substitute x = 50 into the cost equation C(x) = 300 + 10.5x. This yields C(50) = 300 + 10.5(50), resulting in C(50) = 300 + 525 = 825. Thus, the cost for 50 microscopes is $825. Option A ($41,250) is incorrect as it likely results from a miscalculation or misunderstanding of the equation. Option B ($360.50) underestimates the production cost by omitting the correct multiplication factor. Option C ($15,525) suggests an error in the calculation, possibly misinterpreting the coefficients in the equation.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
Type your answer in the box. You may use numbers, a decimal point (-), and/or a negative sign (-) in your answer.
A truck driver sees a road sign warning of an 8% road incline. To the nearest tenth of a foot, what will be the change in the truck's vertical position, in feet, during the time it takes the truck's horizontal position to change by 1 mile? (1 mile = 5,280 ft)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 422.4
To determine the vertical change during a 1-mile horizontal distance on an 8% incline, we calculate the vertical rise using the formula: vertical rise = incline percentage × horizontal distance. Here, 8% as a decimal is 0.08, and the horizontal distance is 5,280 feet. Therefore, the vertical change is 0.08 × 5,280 = 422.4 feet. Other options are incorrect as they either miscalculate the incline percentage or the conversion of miles to feet. For instance, values significantly lower than 422.4 feet suggest a misunderstanding of the incline's impact, while options above this value imply an overestimation of the incline's effect on vertical change.
To determine the vertical change during a 1-mile horizontal distance on an 8% incline, we calculate the vertical rise using the formula: vertical rise = incline percentage × horizontal distance. Here, 8% as a decimal is 0.08, and the horizontal distance is 5,280 feet. Therefore, the vertical change is 0.08 × 5,280 = 422.4 feet. Other options are incorrect as they either miscalculate the incline percentage or the conversion of miles to feet. For instance, values significantly lower than 422.4 feet suggest a misunderstanding of the incline's impact, while options above this value imply an overestimation of the incline's effect on vertical change.
A shipping box for a refrigerator is shaped like a rectangular prism. The box has a depth of 34,25 Inches (in.), a height of 69,37 in., and a width of 32.62 in. To the nearest hundredth cubic inch, what is the volume of the shipping box?
- A. 2,262.85
- B. 77,502.59
- C. 136.24
- D. 25,834.20
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To find the volume of a rectangular prism, multiply its depth, height, and width. In this case, the volume calculation is 34.25 in. (depth) × 69.37 in. (height) × 32.62 in. (width), which equals approximately 77,502.59 cubic inches. Option A (2,262.85) is far too small, likely resulting from an incorrect calculation or misunderstanding of the dimensions. Option C (136.24) represents an even smaller volume, which does not align with the dimensions given. Option D (25,834.20) is also incorrect, as it underestimates the overall volume significantly. Thus, only option B accurately reflects the computed volume of the shipping box.
To find the volume of a rectangular prism, multiply its depth, height, and width. In this case, the volume calculation is 34.25 in. (depth) × 69.37 in. (height) × 32.62 in. (width), which equals approximately 77,502.59 cubic inches. Option A (2,262.85) is far too small, likely resulting from an incorrect calculation or misunderstanding of the dimensions. Option C (136.24) represents an even smaller volume, which does not align with the dimensions given. Option D (25,834.20) is also incorrect, as it underestimates the overall volume significantly. Thus, only option B accurately reflects the computed volume of the shipping box.