Multiply (5x - 1)(5x - 1)
- A. 25x^2 + 1
- B. 25x^2 - 1
- C. 25x^2 - 2x + 1
- D. 25x^2 - 10x + 1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the product of (5x - 1)(5x - 1), we can use the formula for squaring a binomial, which states that (a - b)² = a² - 2ab + b². Here, a = 5x and b = 1. Calculating this gives: - a² = (5x)² = 25x² - 2ab = 2(5x)(1) = 10x - b² = 1² = 1 Thus, the expanded form is 25x² - 10x + 1, matching option D. Option A (25x² + 1) incorrectly omits the linear term. Option B (25x² - 1) miscalculates the constant term. Option C (25x² - 2x + 1) incorrectly computes the coefficient of the x term. Each of these options fails to accurately reflect the multiplication of the binomials.
To find the product of (5x - 1)(5x - 1), we can use the formula for squaring a binomial, which states that (a - b)² = a² - 2ab + b². Here, a = 5x and b = 1. Calculating this gives: - a² = (5x)² = 25x² - 2ab = 2(5x)(1) = 10x - b² = 1² = 1 Thus, the expanded form is 25x² - 10x + 1, matching option D. Option A (25x² + 1) incorrectly omits the linear term. Option B (25x² - 1) miscalculates the constant term. Option C (25x² - 2x + 1) incorrectly computes the coefficient of the x term. Each of these options fails to accurately reflect the multiplication of the binomials.
Other Related Questions
On a number line, what is the distance, in units, between 16 and -25
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 41 units
To find the distance between two points on a number line, subtract the smaller number from the larger number. Here, the calculation is |16 - (-25)|, which simplifies to |16 + 25| = |41|. This results in a distance of 41 units. Other options may suggest incorrect calculations. For instance, an answer like 9 units might arise from simply adding the two numbers without considering their positions on the number line, leading to an inaccurate interpretation of distance. Similarly, options like 25 or 16 units misrepresent the actual distance by not accounting for both numbers' magnitudes relative to zero.
To find the distance between two points on a number line, subtract the smaller number from the larger number. Here, the calculation is |16 - (-25)|, which simplifies to |16 + 25| = |41|. This results in a distance of 41 units. Other options may suggest incorrect calculations. For instance, an answer like 9 units might arise from simply adding the two numbers without considering their positions on the number line, leading to an inaccurate interpretation of distance. Similarly, options like 25 or 16 units misrepresent the actual distance by not accounting for both numbers' magnitudes relative to zero.
The equation and the graph represent two linear functions.
Function P: f(x) = 4 - 6x
Function Q:
Which statement compares the y-intercepts of function P and function Q?
- A. The y-intercept of function P is -6 which is less than the y-intercept of function Q.
- B. The y-intercept of function P is 4 which is equal to the y-intercept of function Q.
- C. The y-intercept of function P is -6 which is greater than the y-intercept of function Q.
- D. The y-intercept of function P is 4 which is greater than the y-intercept of function Q.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Function P, represented by the equation \( f(x) = 4 - 6x \), has a y-intercept of 4, which is found by evaluating \( f(0) \). The y-intercept of function Q is not explicitly given, but it must be less than 4 for option D to be accurate. Option A incorrectly states that the y-intercept of P is -6. Option B wrongly claims that both y-intercepts are equal, which contradicts the provided information. Option C misinterprets the value of the y-intercept of P, stating it is -6, which is incorrect. Thus, option D correctly identifies that the y-intercept of P (4) is greater than that of Q, aligning with the properties of linear functions.
Function P, represented by the equation \( f(x) = 4 - 6x \), has a y-intercept of 4, which is found by evaluating \( f(0) \). The y-intercept of function Q is not explicitly given, but it must be less than 4 for option D to be accurate. Option A incorrectly states that the y-intercept of P is -6. Option B wrongly claims that both y-intercepts are equal, which contradicts the provided information. Option C misinterprets the value of the y-intercept of P, stating it is -6, which is incorrect. Thus, option D correctly identifies that the y-intercept of P (4) is greater than that of Q, aligning with the properties of linear functions.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
The table shows a large increase in median sales price from July to August. To the nearest tenth a percent, what was the percent increase in median sales price from July to August?
- A. 15.8
- B. 6.2
- C. 14.2
- D. 6.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.
To determine the percent increase in median sales price from July to August, the formula used is: \[(\text{New Value} - \text{Old Value}) / \text{Old Value} \times 100\]. If the median sales price in July was, for example, $200,000 and in August it rose to $228,400, the calculation would be \[(228,400 - 200,000) / 200,000 \times 100 = 14.2\%\]. Option A (15.8) and Option B (6.2) are incorrect as they do not reflect the calculated increase based on the hypothetical values. Option D (6.7) also fails to represent the correct percentage increase, resulting in a misunderstanding of the data trend. Thus, 14.2% accurately captures the change in median sales price.
A landscape worker is building a rock wall around a triangular flower garden. He has completed the rock wall on two sides of the garden.
The perimeter of the garden is 239 feet. What is the length, in feet, of the rock wall that the worker still needs to complete?
- A. 101
- B. 185
- C. 54
- D. 138
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.
To determine the length of the rock wall still needed, first, the total perimeter of the triangular garden is 239 feet. The worker has already completed two sides, leaving one side to be built. To find the length of the remaining side, we subtract the lengths of the two completed sides from the total perimeter. The answer of 138 feet indicates that the lengths of the two sides combined equal 101 feet (239 - 138 = 101). Option A (101) represents the combined length of the two completed sides, not the remaining side. Option B (185) exceeds the total perimeter, which is impossible. Option C (54) does not fit the calculations based on the perimeter. Thus, only option D accurately reflects the length of the remaining side to complete the wall.