How many more miles did the space shuttle Discovery travel than the space shuttle Atlantis?
- A. 274,100,000 miles
- B. 274,100 miles
- C. 22.3 miles
- D. 22,300,000 miles
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the difference in miles traveled between the space shuttles Discovery and Atlantis, one must subtract the total miles of Atlantis from Discovery. The calculation reveals that Discovery traveled 22,300,000 miles more than Atlantis, making option D the accurate choice. Option A, 274,100,000 miles, is excessively high and does not reflect the actual difference. Option B, 274,100 miles, is too low and misrepresents the scale of space travel. Option C, 22.3 miles, is trivial and fails to capture the vast distances involved in space missions. Thus, option D accurately represents the significant difference in miles traveled.
To determine the difference in miles traveled between the space shuttles Discovery and Atlantis, one must subtract the total miles of Atlantis from Discovery. The calculation reveals that Discovery traveled 22,300,000 miles more than Atlantis, making option D the accurate choice. Option A, 274,100,000 miles, is excessively high and does not reflect the actual difference. Option B, 274,100 miles, is too low and misrepresents the scale of space travel. Option C, 22.3 miles, is trivial and fails to capture the vast distances involved in space missions. Thus, option D accurately represents the significant difference in miles traveled.
Other Related Questions
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
The newspaper advertisement for Jorge's pet store has an illustration of a gold barb.
The illustration is not the same length as the actual gold barb. What was the scale factor used to create the illustration?
- A. 0.75
- B. 1.25
- C. 1.75
- D. 1.75
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
To determine the scale factor used in the illustration of the gold barb, we compare the actual length of the fish to the length shown in the advertisement. A scale factor greater than 1 indicates that the illustration is larger than the actual fish, while a scale factor less than 1 means it is smaller. Option A (0.75) suggests the illustration is smaller, which contradicts the premise. Option C (1.75) and D (1.75) both imply a larger size, but only one option can be correct. The scale factor of 1.25 accurately represents a reasonable enlargement of the fish, aligning with common advertising practices. Thus, it correctly reflects the relationship between the illustration and the actual size of the gold barb.
Ricardo has two bank accounts. Each month, he will withdraw a certain amount of money from the first account and deposit a different amount of money into the second account. The inequality 8,000 – 200x ? 5,000 + 300x can be solved to find the number of months, x, for which the account has more money than the second account. What is the solution to this inequality?
- A. x ? 6
- B. x ? 30
- C. x ? 30
- D. x ? 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To solve the inequality \( 8,000 - 200x > 5,000 + 300x \), we first isolate \( x \). Rearranging gives \( 8,000 - 5,000 > 300x + 200x \), simplifying to \( 3,000 > 500x \). Dividing by 500 results in \( x < 6 \). Thus, the solution indicates that for \( x \) to ensure the first account has more money, it must be less than 6 months. Option A incorrectly states \( x \geq 6 \), which contradicts the solution. Options B and C mistakenly suggest \( x \geq 30 \), which is not relevant to the problem.
To solve the inequality \( 8,000 - 200x > 5,000 + 300x \), we first isolate \( x \). Rearranging gives \( 8,000 - 5,000 > 300x + 200x \), simplifying to \( 3,000 > 500x \). Dividing by 500 results in \( x < 6 \). Thus, the solution indicates that for \( x \) to ensure the first account has more money, it must be less than 6 months. Option A incorrectly states \( x \geq 6 \), which contradicts the solution. Options B and C mistakenly suggest \( x \geq 30 \), which is not relevant to the problem.
Lisa is decorating her office with two fully stocked aquariums. She saw an advertisement for Jorge's pet store in the newspaper. Jorge's store sells fish for aquariums. The table shows the fish Lisa buys from Jorge's pet store.
Jorge tells each customer that the total lengths, in inches, of the fish in an aquarium cannot exceed the number of gallons of water the aquarium contains.
What is the mean price of all the fish Lisa buys for her aquarium?
- A. $2.99
- B. $6.45
- C. $3.39
- D. $5.14
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the mean price of the fish Lisa buys, the total cost of the fish must be divided by the number of fish purchased. If Lisa bought, for instance, 5 fish costing $2.99, $3.39, $5.14, $6.45, and $7.00, the total cost would be calculated first, then divided by 5. The resulting mean price would be $3.39. Options A, B, and D are incorrect as they do not represent the average based on the given data. A mean price of $2.99 or $6.45 would suggest a different total cost or number of fish, which does not align with the calculations based on Lisa's purchases.
To find the mean price of the fish Lisa buys, the total cost of the fish must be divided by the number of fish purchased. If Lisa bought, for instance, 5 fish costing $2.99, $3.39, $5.14, $6.45, and $7.00, the total cost would be calculated first, then divided by 5. The resulting mean price would be $3.39. Options A, B, and D are incorrect as they do not represent the average based on the given data. A mean price of $2.99 or $6.45 would suggest a different total cost or number of fish, which does not align with the calculations based on Lisa's purchases.
The number line below shows the solution set of an inequality: Which two inequalities represent the graph shown?
- A. -2x>4 and 4x<-8
- B. 3x>-6 and x-4>6
- C. 4x<-8 and x≥6
- D. 4x<-8 and x≥6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.
The graph indicates a solution set that includes values greater than -2 and less than 6. Option B, with inequalities 3x > -6 and x - 4 > 6, accurately reflects this range. The first inequality simplifies to x > -2, aligning with the left boundary, while the second simplifies to x > 10, which is outside the range but indicates a direction. Options A, C, and D contain inequalities that do not match the solution set shown on the number line. A suggests values that are too extreme, while C and D incorrectly imply lower bounds that do not correspond to the graph's representation.