The large square above has sides of length 1. It is divided into smaller squares by dividing each side into 10 equal parts. In the figure, 3 full rows and 4 smaller squares in the next row are shaded. What is the area of the shaded region?
- A. 0.34
- B. 0.37
- C. 0.43
- D. 0.7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.
To determine the area of the shaded region, first note that the large square has a side length of 1, resulting in a total area of 1 square unit. Each side is divided into 10 equal parts, creating a grid of 100 smaller squares, each with an area of 0.01 (1/100). In the figure, 3 full rows of squares are shaded, which accounts for 30 squares (3 rows x 10 squares per row). Additionally, 4 squares are shaded in the fourth row, bringing the total shaded squares to 34. Thus, the area of the shaded region is 34 squares x 0.01 = 0.34. Option B (0.37) incorrectly suggests 37 squares shaded. Option C (0.43) implies 43 squares, which is not possible given the shading described. Option D (0.7) overestimates the shaded area, miscounting the total squares shaded.
Other Related Questions
50.50 ÷ 0.25
- A. 202
- B. 2.2
- C. 2.02
- D. 0.22
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve 50.50 ÷ 0.25, converting the division into a simpler form is helpful. Dividing both numbers by 0.25 effectively transforms the problem into 50.50 ÷ 0.25 = 50.50 × 4, which equals 202. Option B (2.2) is incorrect as it misrepresents the scale of the division, resulting from a misunderstanding of decimal placement. Option C (2.02) also miscalculates the division, likely stemming from incorrect multiplication or division steps. Option D (0.22) is far too low, indicating a significant error in understanding the relationship between the dividend and divisor.
To solve 50.50 ÷ 0.25, converting the division into a simpler form is helpful. Dividing both numbers by 0.25 effectively transforms the problem into 50.50 ÷ 0.25 = 50.50 × 4, which equals 202. Option B (2.2) is incorrect as it misrepresents the scale of the division, resulting from a misunderstanding of decimal placement. Option C (2.02) also miscalculates the division, likely stemming from incorrect multiplication or division steps. Option D (0.22) is far too low, indicating a significant error in understanding the relationship between the dividend and divisor.
Which of the four labeled points on the number line above has coordinate-?
- A. A
- B. B
- C. C
- D. D
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Point B is positioned at the coordinate -2 on the number line, making it the accurate choice. Point A is located at -1, which is not the specified coordinate. Point C is at 0, representing the origin, and thus does not match the target coordinate. Point D is found at 1, clearly outside the negative range required. Each of these points is distinctly marked, confirming that only Point B aligns with the coordinate of -2. This clarity in placement reinforces the understanding of negative values on a number line.
Point B is positioned at the coordinate -2 on the number line, making it the accurate choice. Point A is located at -1, which is not the specified coordinate. Point C is at 0, representing the origin, and thus does not match the target coordinate. Point D is found at 1, clearly outside the negative range required. Each of these points is distinctly marked, confirming that only Point B aligns with the coordinate of -2. This clarity in placement reinforces the understanding of negative values on a number line.
Harriet took 48 minutes to ride her bike the distance from her house to the town library. If she rode at a constant rate, what fraction of the total distance did she ride in the first 12 minutes?
- A. 1/4
- B. 1/3
- C. 1/2
- D. 3/4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the fraction of the total distance Harriet rode in the first 12 minutes, we start by recognizing that she took 48 minutes for the entire trip. Riding at a constant rate means that her distance covered is proportional to the time spent riding. In 12 minutes, which is one-fourth of the total 48 minutes, she would have covered one-fourth of the total distance. Thus, the fraction of the total distance she rode in the first 12 minutes is 1/4. Options B (1/3), C (1/2), and D (3/4) misrepresent the proportion of time to total time. Each suggests a greater fraction than what corresponds to 12 minutes relative to 48 minutes, leading to incorrect conclusions about the distance covered.
To determine the fraction of the total distance Harriet rode in the first 12 minutes, we start by recognizing that she took 48 minutes for the entire trip. Riding at a constant rate means that her distance covered is proportional to the time spent riding. In 12 minutes, which is one-fourth of the total 48 minutes, she would have covered one-fourth of the total distance. Thus, the fraction of the total distance she rode in the first 12 minutes is 1/4. Options B (1/3), C (1/2), and D (3/4) misrepresent the proportion of time to total time. Each suggests a greater fraction than what corresponds to 12 minutes relative to 48 minutes, leading to incorrect conclusions about the distance covered.
Multiplying a certain nonzero number by 0.01 gives the same result as dividing the number by
- A. 100
- B. 10
- C. 1/10
- D. 1/100
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.
When a nonzero number is multiplied by 0.01, it is equivalent to dividing that number by 100. This is because multiplying by 0.01 (or 1/100) reduces the value of the number to one-hundredth of its original amount. Option B (10) is incorrect as dividing by 10 would yield a larger result than multiplying by 0.01. Option C (1/10) is also wrong because dividing by 1/10 actually increases the number, contrary to the operation of multiplying by 0.01. Option D (1/100) might seem close, but it represents the multiplication factor rather than the division needed. Thus, dividing by 100 accurately reflects the operation of multiplying by 0.01.