Alexia bought a book that is 252 pages long. She read the book in 3 days. The first day, she read 1/2 of the book's pages, the second day, she read 1/3 of the book's pages, and the third day she read all the remaining pages. How many pages did Alexia read the third day?
- A. 3200%
- B. 3600%
- C. 4000%
- D. 4200%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many pages Alexia read on the third day, we first calculate the pages read on the first two days. On the first day, she read half of 252 pages, which is 126 pages. On the second day, she read one-third, totaling 84 pages. Adding these gives 210 pages read over the first two days. Thus, the remaining pages for the third day are 252 - 210 = 42 pages. Options A, B, and C do not relate to the total pages read, as they present percentages rather than the actual number of pages. The correct choice reflects the accurate calculation of pages read on the final day.
To determine how many pages Alexia read on the third day, we first calculate the pages read on the first two days. On the first day, she read half of 252 pages, which is 126 pages. On the second day, she read one-third, totaling 84 pages. Adding these gives 210 pages read over the first two days. Thus, the remaining pages for the third day are 252 - 210 = 42 pages. Options A, B, and C do not relate to the total pages read, as they present percentages rather than the actual number of pages. The correct choice reflects the accurate calculation of pages read on the final day.
Other Related Questions
At the Crest Coffee Shop, the cost of a plain bagel was $0.75 last year. This year the cost of a plain bagel is $0.90. By what percent did the cost of a plain bagel increase from last year to this year?
- A. 10%
- B. 15%
- C. 17%
- D. 20%
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the percent increase in the cost of a plain bagel, the formula used is: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{\text{New Price} - \text{Old Price}}{\text{Old Price}} \right) \times 100 \] Substituting the given values: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{0.90 - 0.75}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{0.15}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = 20\% \] Option A (10%) underestimates the increase, while B (15%) and C (17%) also fail to reflect the correct calculation. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms a 20% increase in cost.
To determine the percent increase in the cost of a plain bagel, the formula used is: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{\text{New Price} - \text{Old Price}}{\text{Old Price}} \right) \times 100 \] Substituting the given values: \[ \text{Percent Increase} = \left( \frac{0.90 - 0.75}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = \left( \frac{0.15}{0.75} \right) \times 100 = 20\% \] Option A (10%) underestimates the increase, while B (15%) and C (17%) also fail to reflect the correct calculation. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms a 20% increase in cost.
Which of the following inequalities is correct?
- A. 2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7
- B. 2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5
- C. 3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7
- D. 3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the order of the fractions, we can convert them to decimals or find a common denominator. - **Option A (2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7)** is incorrect because 2/3 (approximately 0.67) is greater than 3/5 (0.6), violating the first inequality. - **Option B (2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5)** is also incorrect, as 5/7 (approximately 0.71) is greater than 2/3, making the first inequality false. - **Option D (3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3)** is incorrect because, while 3/5 is less than 5/7, 5/7 is greater than 2/3, contradicting the second inequality. - **Option C (3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7)** is accurate; 3/5 is indeed less than 2/3, and 2/3 is less than 5/7, maintaining the correct order.
To determine the order of the fractions, we can convert them to decimals or find a common denominator. - **Option A (2/3 < 3/5 < 5/7)** is incorrect because 2/3 (approximately 0.67) is greater than 3/5 (0.6), violating the first inequality. - **Option B (2/3 < 5/7 < 3/5)** is also incorrect, as 5/7 (approximately 0.71) is greater than 2/3, making the first inequality false. - **Option D (3/5 < 5/7 < 2/3)** is incorrect because, while 3/5 is less than 5/7, 5/7 is greater than 2/3, contradicting the second inequality. - **Option C (3/5 < 2/3 < 5/7)** is accurate; 3/5 is indeed less than 2/3, and 2/3 is less than 5/7, maintaining the correct order.
Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan from the school library. Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda has. If Richard has borrowed 17 books from the library, how many books has Susan borrowed?
- A. 25
- B. 26
- C. 34
- D. 42
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
To determine how many books Susan has borrowed, start with Richard's 17 books. Since Richard has borrowed half as many books as Linda, Linda must have borrowed 34 books (17 x 2). Given that Linda has borrowed 8 more books than Susan, we can set up the equation: Linda's books = Susan's books + 8. Therefore, if Linda has 34 books, we find Susan's total by subtracting 8: 34 - 8 = 26. Option A (25) is incorrect as it underestimates Susan's total. Option C (34) mistakenly suggests Susan borrowed the same amount as Linda. Option D (42) overestimates Susan's total by not accounting for the difference of 8 books. Thus, the only valid option is 26.
Kayla has a stack of photographs that is 20 centimeters high. If each photograph is 0.04 cm thick, how many photos are there in the stack?
- A. 8
- B. 50
- C. 80
- D. 500
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the number of photographs in the stack, divide the total height of the stack by the thickness of each photograph. The stack is 20 cm high and each photograph is 0.04 cm thick. Calculating this gives: 20 cm รท 0.04 cm = 500 photographs. Option A (8) is incorrect as it underestimates the total by not accounting for the thickness appropriately. Option B (50) also miscalculates the total, suggesting a much smaller number of photographs. Option C (80) is an overestimation, failing to consider the correct division of height by thickness. Only option D (500) accurately reflects the calculation, confirming the total number of photographs in the stack.
To determine the number of photographs in the stack, divide the total height of the stack by the thickness of each photograph. The stack is 20 cm high and each photograph is 0.04 cm thick. Calculating this gives: 20 cm รท 0.04 cm = 500 photographs. Option A (8) is incorrect as it underestimates the total by not accounting for the thickness appropriately. Option B (50) also miscalculates the total, suggesting a much smaller number of photographs. Option C (80) is an overestimation, failing to consider the correct division of height by thickness. Only option D (500) accurately reflects the calculation, confirming the total number of photographs in the stack.