The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year. Which of the following revisions successfully corrects the sentence?
- A. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- B. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and raising twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- C. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and, consequently, to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- D. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend; that the keynote speaker would be well received; and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Other Related Questions
Which of the following sentences contains an example of personification?
- A. It is raining cats and dogs.
- B. I can hear the wind whispering to me.
- C. I felt as brave as a lion prowling the jungle.
- D. My friend spent ten years on one math problem.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Personification attributes human qualities to non-human entities. Option B, "I can hear the wind whispering to me," exemplifies this by giving the wind the human ability to whisper, creating a vivid image. Option A, "It is raining cats and dogs," is an idiomatic expression and does not attribute human traits to animals or objects. Option C, "I felt as brave as a lion prowling the jungle," uses a simile to compare feelings to a lion's bravery, but does not personify the lion itself. Option D, "My friend spent ten years on one math problem," describes a human experience without personifying any non-human element.
Personification attributes human qualities to non-human entities. Option B, "I can hear the wind whispering to me," exemplifies this by giving the wind the human ability to whisper, creating a vivid image. Option A, "It is raining cats and dogs," is an idiomatic expression and does not attribute human traits to animals or objects. Option C, "I felt as brave as a lion prowling the jungle," uses a simile to compare feelings to a lion's bravery, but does not personify the lion itself. Option D, "My friend spent ten years on one math problem," describes a human experience without personifying any non-human element.
Which of the following best describes a benefit of having students read both excerpts?
- A. Students can analyze the differences between a primary and a secondary source document.
- B. Students can compare the facts in the primary source to the emotions expressed in the secondary source.
- C. Students can understand different points of view when forming an opinion about an event.
- D. Students can learn to recognize whether sources are reliable.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Analyzing both excerpts allows students to distinguish between primary and secondary sources, enhancing their understanding of historical context and perspective. Option B is misleading; while comparing facts and emotions is valuable, it does not specifically address the unique characteristics of primary versus secondary sources. Option C is also important, yet it focuses more on perspectives rather than the source types themselves. Option D, while relevant to evaluating reliability, does not emphasize the distinction between primary and secondary sources, which is central to the learning objective. Understanding these differences is crucial for critical analysis in historical studies.
Analyzing both excerpts allows students to distinguish between primary and secondary sources, enhancing their understanding of historical context and perspective. Option B is misleading; while comparing facts and emotions is valuable, it does not specifically address the unique characteristics of primary versus secondary sources. Option C is also important, yet it focuses more on perspectives rather than the source types themselves. Option D, while relevant to evaluating reliability, does not emphasize the distinction between primary and secondary sources, which is central to the learning objective. Understanding these differences is crucial for critical analysis in historical studies.
During an oral presentation, which of the following strategies will best help a speaker facilitate audience comprehension of the material presented?
- A. Varying vocal volume
- B. Articulating words clearly
- C. Wearing proper attire
- D. Using hand gestures
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Articulating words clearly directly enhances audience understanding, ensuring that key points are communicated effectively. This clarity is essential for comprehension, particularly in complex topics. Varying vocal volume (A) can engage the audience but may not significantly aid in comprehension if the words are not articulated clearly. Wearing proper attire (C) contributes to professionalism but does not impact the audience's understanding of the material. Using hand gestures (D) can support engagement and emphasize points but, without clear articulation, may lead to confusion rather than clarity.
Articulating words clearly directly enhances audience understanding, ensuring that key points are communicated effectively. This clarity is essential for comprehension, particularly in complex topics. Varying vocal volume (A) can engage the audience but may not significantly aid in comprehension if the words are not articulated clearly. Wearing proper attire (C) contributes to professionalism but does not impact the audience's understanding of the material. Using hand gestures (D) can support engagement and emphasize points but, without clear articulation, may lead to confusion rather than clarity.
The author supports the claim that satellites do not last forever through the use of which of the following?
- A. An anecdote about why satellites stop working when they do
- B. Examples of the ways satellites stop working over time
- C. A comparison of satellites to other common machines that stop working
- D. Suggestions for ways to keep satellites working over time
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The author effectively demonstrates that satellites do not last forever by comparing them to other common machines that also have limited lifespans. This comparison highlights the inevitability of wear and tear in technology, providing a relatable context for readers. Option A, an anecdote, may illustrate a specific instance but lacks the broader applicability needed to support the claim. Option B provides examples of satellite failures but does not frame them within a comparative context that strengthens the argument. Option D suggests preventive measures but does not address the inherent limitations of satellites, which is central to the claim.
The author effectively demonstrates that satellites do not last forever by comparing them to other common machines that also have limited lifespans. This comparison highlights the inevitability of wear and tear in technology, providing a relatable context for readers. Option A, an anecdote, may illustrate a specific instance but lacks the broader applicability needed to support the claim. Option B provides examples of satellite failures but does not frame them within a comparative context that strengthens the argument. Option D suggests preventive measures but does not address the inherent limitations of satellites, which is central to the claim.