The St. Louis
This passage describes the journey of the ship St. Louis, which attempted to leave Germany with immigrants wishing to escape Nazi rule.
1 in January, 1933, Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany. The country's first concentration camp opened two months later, to be followed by many more. They were originally built to house "enemies of the state" that threatened Nazi political control or were accused of socially deviant behavior. But when side-scale arrests of Jewish German and Austrian citizens began after Germany's annexation of Austria in 1938, many of these individuals were sent to the camps. A growing number of Germany's Jewish population, fearful of increasing anti-Semitism, left or tried to eave Germany.
2. A few months before the start of World War II, the ship St. Louis left Hamburg, Germany, with 937 passengers, mostly Jewish refugees. Headed to Havana, Cuba, they were unaware that Cuba's president had invalidated all recently issued landing certificates. He claimed certificates had been sold by a corrupt government official. Although most of the St. Louis passengers had applied for U.S. visas and planned to be in Cuba only temporarily, they now faced an uncertain future.
3 When the ship arrived in Havana, the Cuban government refused to allow 908 of the passengers to leave the ship. After six days the ship was ordered to leave Cuba. It began a slow, 4 day journey along the Cuba and Florida coasts, the passengers hoping they would be permitted to enter the United States. Direct appeals were made to President Roosevelt, but he and State Department officials decided to not take any special exceptions for the passengers. Immigration at the time was strictly limited by quotas established in the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1924. The German-Austrian immigration limit of 27,370 for 1939 had been quickly filled.
4 The St. Louis headed back to Europe but not to Germany. Jewish organizations
What is the most likely reason the St. Louis did not return to Hamburg?
- A. The start of World War II made it too dangerous to travel that far.
- B. Most of the passengers were originally from Belgium, not Germany.
- C. The ship did not have enough fuel after being at sea for so long.
- D. The passengers could have ended up being sent to concentration camps.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The most compelling reason the St. Louis did not return to Hamburg is that the passengers faced the real threat of being sent to concentration camps. As the political climate in Europe shifted dramatically during this period, returning them to Germany would have put their lives in jeopardy. Option A, while recognizing the dangers of wartime travel, does not specifically address the immediate threat to the passengers' safety. Option B is inaccurate; the origin of most passengers does not influence the ship's decision to return. Option C is also incorrect; fuel levels would not have been a primary concern compared to the safety of the passengers.
The most compelling reason the St. Louis did not return to Hamburg is that the passengers faced the real threat of being sent to concentration camps. As the political climate in Europe shifted dramatically during this period, returning them to Germany would have put their lives in jeopardy. Option A, while recognizing the dangers of wartime travel, does not specifically address the immediate threat to the passengers' safety. Option B is inaccurate; the origin of most passengers does not influence the ship's decision to return. Option C is also incorrect; fuel levels would not have been a primary concern compared to the safety of the passengers.
Other Related Questions
The following is a list of events related to the passage. I. Hitler appointed chancellor II. Immigration and Naturalization Act enacted III. World War II began IV. Germany annexed Austria Place these events in chronological order, from earliest to latest.
- A. I, IV, III, II
- B. II, I, IV, III
- C. III, II, I, IV
- D. IV, III, II, I
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B presents the events in the correct chronological order. The Immigration and Naturalization Act was enacted first in 1924. Following that, Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1933. Next, Germany annexed Austria in 1938, leading up to the outbreak of World War II in 1939. Option A incorrectly places the Immigration and Naturalization Act after the others. Option C misplaces the events by starting with World War II, which occurred last. Option D also lists events out of order, starting with the annexation of Austria before the appointment of Hitler and the war. Understanding the timeline is crucial for grasping the historical context.
Option B presents the events in the correct chronological order. The Immigration and Naturalization Act was enacted first in 1924. Following that, Hitler was appointed chancellor of Germany in 1933. Next, Germany annexed Austria in 1938, leading up to the outbreak of World War II in 1939. Option A incorrectly places the Immigration and Naturalization Act after the others. Option C misplaces the events by starting with World War II, which occurred last. Option D also lists events out of order, starting with the annexation of Austria before the appointment of Hitler and the war. Understanding the timeline is crucial for grasping the historical context.
Which statement is true about the four countries that accepted the passengers?
- A. They had camps similar to those established by Germany.
- B. They were allies during World War II.
- C. They had Europe's largest populations prior to World War I.
- D. They each shared a border with Germany.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Option B is accurate as the four countries that accepted the passengers were indeed allies during World War II, collaborating against the Axis powers. Option A is incorrect because these countries did not establish camps similar to those in Germany; instead, they provided refuge to those fleeing persecution. Option C is misleading; while some of these countries had significant populations, they were not necessarily the largest in Europe prior to World War I. Option D is false as not all of the countries shared a border with Germany, which limits the applicability of this statement.
Option B is accurate as the four countries that accepted the passengers were indeed allies during World War II, collaborating against the Axis powers. Option A is incorrect because these countries did not establish camps similar to those in Germany; instead, they provided refuge to those fleeing persecution. Option C is misleading; while some of these countries had significant populations, they were not necessarily the largest in Europe prior to World War I. Option D is false as not all of the countries shared a border with Germany, which limits the applicability of this statement.
A drought strikes Toland and decreases the amount of fish caught from 8 units to 2 units. How will this change affect trade negotiations for the following year?
- A. The countries should maintain the existing agreement.
- B. Both countries should produce both goods.
- C. Toland should specialize in the production of timber.
- D. Toland should specialize in the production of fish.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
A decrease in fish catch due to drought shifts Toland's production capabilities. Specializing in timber (Option C) allows Toland to focus on a resource that can still be produced effectively, potentially increasing trade value. Maintaining the existing agreement (Option A) ignores the new realities of reduced fish availability, which could lead to imbalances. Producing both goods (Option B) may spread resources too thin, hindering efficiency. Specializing in fish (Option D) is unwise, as the drought has drastically reduced fish availability, making it impractical to rely on this sector.
Based on the obituary, what was one result business owners could expect if they put into place Taylor's doctrines?
- A. Loyal employees
- B. Increased outputs
- C. Managers doing more work
- D. Laborers becoming company presidents
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Implementing Taylor's doctrines, which emphasize scientific management and efficiency, would likely lead to increased outputs. These principles focus on optimizing work processes and enhancing productivity, resulting in higher production levels. Option A, loyal employees, is not a direct outcome of Taylorism; while efficiency may improve morale, loyalty is not guaranteed. Option C, managers doing more work, contradicts Taylor's aim of defining roles clearly to enhance efficiency. Option D, laborers becoming company presidents, is unrealistic within the framework of Taylor's doctrines, which prioritize specialization rather than promoting laborers to managerial positions.
Implementing Taylor's doctrines, which emphasize scientific management and efficiency, would likely lead to increased outputs. These principles focus on optimizing work processes and enhancing productivity, resulting in higher production levels. Option A, loyal employees, is not a direct outcome of Taylorism; while efficiency may improve morale, loyalty is not guaranteed. Option C, managers doing more work, contradicts Taylor's aim of defining roles clearly to enhance efficiency. Option D, laborers becoming company presidents, is unrealistic within the framework of Taylor's doctrines, which prioritize specialization rather than promoting laborers to managerial positions.