Which graph shows 3y - 2x = 6?
-
A.
-
B.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the graph of the equation \(3y - 2x = 6\), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form \(y = mx + b\). This gives us \(y = \frac{2}{3}x + 2\), indicating a slope of \(\frac{2}{3}\) and a y-intercept of 2. Option B accurately represents this line, showing the correct slope and intercept. In contrast, Option A does not align with the expected slope or y-intercept, thus failing to represent the equation correctly. The visual representation in Option B confirms the relationship defined by the equation.
To determine the graph of the equation \(3y - 2x = 6\), we can rearrange it into slope-intercept form \(y = mx + b\). This gives us \(y = \frac{2}{3}x + 2\), indicating a slope of \(\frac{2}{3}\) and a y-intercept of 2. Option B accurately represents this line, showing the correct slope and intercept. In contrast, Option A does not align with the expected slope or y-intercept, thus failing to represent the equation correctly. The visual representation in Option B confirms the relationship defined by the equation.
Other Related Questions
Laura walks every evening on the edges of a sports field near her house. The field is in the shape of a rectangle 300 feet (ft) long and 200 ft wide, so 1 lap on the edges of the field is 1,000 ft. She enters through a gate at point G, located exactly halfway along the length of the field.
Type your answer in the box. You may use numbers, a decimal point (.), and/or negative sign (-) in your answer.
One evening on her walk, Laura walks across the field from point W back to the gate at point G. What is the distance she walks, in feet, from point W to point G?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 250
To determine the distance Laura walks from point W to gate G, we can use the Pythagorean theorem. The field is a rectangle, and point W is at one corner. The length from W to G is half the length of the field (150 ft) and the width of the field (200 ft). Calculating the distance: Distance = √(150² + 200²) = √(22500 + 40000) = √62500 = 250 ft. Other options are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the geometric relationship of the points. Distances such as 300 ft or 200 ft misinterpret the diagonal distance, while any number below 250 fails to account for both dimensions of the rectangle.
To determine the distance Laura walks from point W to gate G, we can use the Pythagorean theorem. The field is a rectangle, and point W is at one corner. The length from W to G is half the length of the field (150 ft) and the width of the field (200 ft). Calculating the distance: Distance = √(150² + 200²) = √(22500 + 40000) = √62500 = 250 ft. Other options are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the geometric relationship of the points. Distances such as 300 ft or 200 ft misinterpret the diagonal distance, while any number below 250 fails to account for both dimensions of the rectangle.
What is the value of f(-3) for f(x) = 2x^2 + x + 1
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: -20
To find \( f(-3) \) for the function \( f(x) = 2x^2 + x + 1 \), substitute \(-3\) for \(x\): \[ f(-3) = 2(-3)^2 + (-3) + 1 = 2(9) - 3 + 1 = 18 - 3 + 1 = 16. \] The correct answer is -20, which is incorrect based on the calculation. Examining the other options: - If an option were 16, it would be correct as shown in the calculation. - Any other number, like -10 or 0, would arise from miscalculations or incorrect substitutions, thus not representing the function's value at \(-3\). The accurate evaluation confirms that \( f(-3) = 16 \).
To find \( f(-3) \) for the function \( f(x) = 2x^2 + x + 1 \), substitute \(-3\) for \(x\): \[ f(-3) = 2(-3)^2 + (-3) + 1 = 2(9) - 3 + 1 = 18 - 3 + 1 = 16. \] The correct answer is -20, which is incorrect based on the calculation. Examining the other options: - If an option were 16, it would be correct as shown in the calculation. - Any other number, like -10 or 0, would arise from miscalculations or incorrect substitutions, thus not representing the function's value at \(-3\). The accurate evaluation confirms that \( f(-3) = 16 \).
A bag of dog food weighs 40 pounds. The amount of food in the bag is more than 3 times the amount needed to feed a dog for one week. Which inequality can be used to determine the possible values for p, the pounds of food needed to feed the dog for one week?
- A. p < 3(40)
- B. 3p < 40
- C. p > 3(40)
- D. 3p > 40
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
To find the amount of food needed for one week, we know that the total weight of the dog food (40 pounds) is more than three times the weekly requirement (3p). Therefore, the relationship can be expressed as 3p < 40, indicating that the total food exceeds three times the weekly amount. Option A (p < 3(40)) incorrectly suggests that the weekly requirement is less than three times the total weight, which is not supported by the problem statement. Option B (3p < 40) misrepresents the relationship, as it implies the total food is less than three times the weekly need, contradicting the given information. Option C (p > 3(40)) inaccurately states that the weekly requirement exceeds three times the total weight, which is impossible given the context. Thus, the correct inequality is 3p > 40, indicating the total food is indeed more than three times the weekly requirement.
Solve the inequality for x: -4/3 x + 4 ? 16
- A. x??9
- B. x??9
- C. x??9
- D. x?9
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the inequality \(-\frac{4}{3}x + 4 < 16\), first isolate \(x\) by subtracting 4 from both sides, resulting in \(-\frac{4}{3}x < 12\). Next, multiply both sides by \(-\frac{3}{4}\), remembering to reverse the inequality sign, yielding \(x > 9\). Options B and C incorrectly suggest \(x < 9\), which contradicts our solution. Option D, stating \(x \leq 9\), also misrepresents the inequality since it does not include values greater than 9. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the solution \(x > 9\).
To solve the inequality \(-\frac{4}{3}x + 4 < 16\), first isolate \(x\) by subtracting 4 from both sides, resulting in \(-\frac{4}{3}x < 12\). Next, multiply both sides by \(-\frac{3}{4}\), remembering to reverse the inequality sign, yielding \(x > 9\). Options B and C incorrectly suggest \(x < 9\), which contradicts our solution. Option D, stating \(x \leq 9\), also misrepresents the inequality since it does not include values greater than 9. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the solution \(x > 9\).