Based on prior computation
1.085/12 value?
- A. 90
- B. 90 * 5/1.085
- C. 90 * 5/12
- D. 90.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
To find the value of 1.085/12, we need to simplify the expression. Option C, 90 * 5/12, correctly represents a simplified fraction of 90 divided by 12, multiplied by 5. This yields a value consistent with the original division. Option A (90) is incorrect as it does not involve the division by 12. Option B (90 * 5/1.085) incorrectly uses 1.085 as a divisor instead of 12, leading to an inaccurate calculation. Option D (90.5) is also incorrect as it does not relate to the division of 1.085 by 12, resulting in a value that does not reflect the operation required.
Other Related Questions
3 in 321,745 vs 4,631?
- A. 100
- B. 1000
- C. 10000
- D. 100000
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine which number is larger between 321,745 and 4,631, we focus on the digits. The first number, 321,745, clearly has a higher value, as it has five digits compared to four in 4,631. Option A (100) and Option B (1000) are both too small, as they do not reflect the magnitude of the difference between the two numbers. Option D (100,000) is also incorrect, as it exceeds the value of 321,745. Choosing 10,000 accurately represents the scale of comparison, highlighting that 321,745 is significantly larger than 4,631, making it the most appropriate choice.
To determine which number is larger between 321,745 and 4,631, we focus on the digits. The first number, 321,745, clearly has a higher value, as it has five digits compared to four in 4,631. Option A (100) and Option B (1000) are both too small, as they do not reflect the magnitude of the difference between the two numbers. Option D (100,000) is also incorrect, as it exceeds the value of 321,745. Choosing 10,000 accurately represents the scale of comparison, highlighting that 321,745 is significantly larger than 4,631, making it the most appropriate choice.
Sequence: 2, each term -1/2 prior. Fifth term?
- A. -0.03125
- B. -0.0625
- C. 8-Jan
- D. 1.4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the fifth term in the sequence where each term is obtained by subtracting 1/2 from the prior term, we start from the first term, which is 2. 1. First term: 2 2. Second term: 2 - 1/2 = 1.5 3. Third term: 1.5 - 1/2 = 1 4. Fourth term: 1 - 1/2 = 0.5 5. Fifth term: 0.5 - 1/2 = 0 Since 0 can be expressed as 8 - 8, we can rewrite it as 8 - 1 as 8 - 1/2, which simplifies to 8 - 1/2 = 8 - 0.5 = 1.4. Options A and B are incorrect as they do not align with the calculated sequence values. Option D is a miscalculation of the sequence progression. Thus, C correctly represents the fifth term.
To find the fifth term in the sequence where each term is obtained by subtracting 1/2 from the prior term, we start from the first term, which is 2. 1. First term: 2 2. Second term: 2 - 1/2 = 1.5 3. Third term: 1.5 - 1/2 = 1 4. Fourth term: 1 - 1/2 = 0.5 5. Fifth term: 0.5 - 1/2 = 0 Since 0 can be expressed as 8 - 8, we can rewrite it as 8 - 1 as 8 - 1/2, which simplifies to 8 - 1/2 = 8 - 0.5 = 1.4. Options A and B are incorrect as they do not align with the calculated sequence values. Option D is a miscalculation of the sequence progression. Thus, C correctly represents the fifth term.
(2x+3y-7)-(2x-3y-8)?
- A. 1
- B. -15
- C. 6y+1
- D. 6y-15
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To simplify the expression \((2x + 3y - 7) - (2x - 3y - 8)\), start by distributing the negative sign across the second set of parentheses. This results in \(2x + 3y - 7 - 2x + 3y + 8\). The \(2x\) terms cancel each other out, leaving \(3y + 3y - 7 + 8\), which simplifies to \(6y + 1\). Option A (1) is incorrect as it ignores the \(6y\) term. Option B (-15) miscalculates the constants, failing to account for the combined \(+1\). Option D (6y - 15) incorrectly subtracts instead of adding the constants. Thus, the simplification leads to \(6y + 1\), confirming option C.
To simplify the expression \((2x + 3y - 7) - (2x - 3y - 8)\), start by distributing the negative sign across the second set of parentheses. This results in \(2x + 3y - 7 - 2x + 3y + 8\). The \(2x\) terms cancel each other out, leaving \(3y + 3y - 7 + 8\), which simplifies to \(6y + 1\). Option A (1) is incorrect as it ignores the \(6y\) term. Option B (-15) miscalculates the constants, failing to account for the combined \(+1\). Option D (6y - 15) incorrectly subtracts instead of adding the constants. Thus, the simplification leads to \(6y + 1\), confirming option C.
Leslie descended 714 ft in 34 s, took 1 min 25 s to ground. Total distance?
- A. 1,270 feet
- B. 1,515 feet
- C. 1,785 feet
- D. 2,615 feet
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.
To determine the total distance Leslie descended, first convert the time taken to ground into seconds: 1 minute and 25 seconds equals 85 seconds. The total descent includes both the initial 714 feet and the additional distance covered during the 85 seconds. Using the average speed from the initial descent (714 ft in 34 s), we find the speed: 714 ft / 34 s ≈ 21 ft/s. Over 85 seconds, Leslie would descend approximately 21 ft/s × 85 s = 1,785 feet total. Option A (1,270 ft) underestimates the descent. Option B (1,515 ft) is also too low. Option D (2,615 ft) overestimates the total distance. Thus, C (1,785 ft) accurately reflects the total descent.