Cost of 3 cans of peaches is $2.67. Cost of 8 cans?
- A. $5.34
- B. $7.12
- C. $8.01
- D. $21.36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
Other Related Questions
Uniforms: 2 pants, 3 shirts. Add black, maroon. New outfits?
- A. 3
- B. 5
- C. 6
- D. 7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
Driveway for two cars, width?
- A. 0.7
- B. 7
- C. 70
- D. 700
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
Prism: 5.0cm, 7.3cm, 9.2cm. Surface area?
- A. 149.66
- B. 167.9
- C. 299.32
- D. 335.18
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the surface area of a rectangular prism, the formula is SA = 2(lw + lh + wh), where l, w, and h are the length, width, and height, respectively. Substituting the given dimensions (5.0 cm, 7.3 cm, and 9.2 cm) into the formula yields a surface area of 299.32 cm². Option A (149.66) likely results from miscalculating or omitting a dimension. Option B (167.9) may arise from incorrect multiplication or addition. Option D (335.18) could be a result of doubling the correct surface area without proper calculation. Thus, only option C accurately represents the surface area of the prism.
To find the surface area of a rectangular prism, the formula is SA = 2(lw + lh + wh), where l, w, and h are the length, width, and height, respectively. Substituting the given dimensions (5.0 cm, 7.3 cm, and 9.2 cm) into the formula yields a surface area of 299.32 cm². Option A (149.66) likely results from miscalculating or omitting a dimension. Option B (167.9) may arise from incorrect multiplication or addition. Option D (335.18) could be a result of doubling the correct surface area without proper calculation. Thus, only option C accurately represents the surface area of the prism.
Yellow binders?
- A. 20
- B. 40
- C. 200
- D. 400
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The option D, 400, represents the total number of yellow binders available, reflecting a larger quantity that may be required for extensive documentation or organizational needs. Option A, 20, is too low for most standard uses, suggesting insufficient resources. Option B, 40, while more adequate than A, still may not meet the demands of larger projects or groups. Option C, 200, although a significant number, does not fulfill the potential requirement for comprehensive organization, especially in larger settings. Thus, option D ensures ample supply for diverse needs.
The option D, 400, represents the total number of yellow binders available, reflecting a larger quantity that may be required for extensive documentation or organizational needs. Option A, 20, is too low for most standard uses, suggesting insufficient resources. Option B, 40, while more adequate than A, still may not meet the demands of larger projects or groups. Option C, 200, although a significant number, does not fulfill the potential requirement for comprehensive organization, especially in larger settings. Thus, option D ensures ample supply for diverse needs.