A carpenter is installing shelves in 2 offices. Each office will have 4 shelves. The wood the carpenter wants to use comes in 6-foot-long boards. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long and is constructed from a single board. How many boards does the carpenter need to buy to make the shelves?
- A. 2
- B. 8
- C. 3
- D. 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
To determine how many boards are needed, first calculate the total length of wood required for the shelves. Each office has 4 shelves, and with 2 offices, that totals 8 shelves. Each shelf is 2 ¼ feet long, which equals 2.25 feet. Therefore, the total length required is 8 shelves x 2.25 feet = 18 feet. Each board is 6 feet long. Dividing the total length (18 feet) by the length of each board (6 feet) gives 3 boards. However, since each board can only be used for one shelf, and we can't cut a board to make multiple shelves, we need to round up to the nearest whole number of boards needed, which is 4. - Option A (2 boards) is insufficient for the total length required. - Option B (8 boards) exceeds the necessary amount. - Option C (3 boards) miscalculates the total need based on the cut requirement. Thus, 4 boards are necessary to accommodate all shelves without waste.
Other Related Questions
An advertisement poster in the window of a shoe store is in the shape of a rectangle. The length of the poster is 9 less than 4 times the width. Which expression represents the length of the poster when w is the width
- A. 4w - 9
- B. 9 - 4w
- C. 4w + 9
- D. 9w - 4
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The expression for the length of the poster is determined by the relationship given in the problem. The length is described as "9 less than 4 times the width," which translates mathematically to \(4w - 9\). Option A (4w - 9) accurately reflects this relationship. Option B (9 - 4w) incorrectly suggests that the length is greater than 9 and decreases as width increases, which contradicts the problem's description. Option C (4w + 9) implies that the length increases by 9, rather than decreasing, which is not aligned with the original statement. Option D (9w - 4) introduces an incorrect multiplication factor and does not adhere to the given relationship, making it invalid.
The expression for the length of the poster is determined by the relationship given in the problem. The length is described as "9 less than 4 times the width," which translates mathematically to \(4w - 9\). Option A (4w - 9) accurately reflects this relationship. Option B (9 - 4w) incorrectly suggests that the length is greater than 9 and decreases as width increases, which contradicts the problem's description. Option C (4w + 9) implies that the length increases by 9, rather than decreasing, which is not aligned with the original statement. Option D (9w - 4) introduces an incorrect multiplication factor and does not adhere to the given relationship, making it invalid.
((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^(-2) * 2^5)
- A. 5^3 * 2^11
- B. 5^(-12) * 2^40
- C. 5^4 * 2^13
- D. (-5)^8 * 2^13
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To simplify the expression \(((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^{-2} * 2^5)\), first apply the power of a product rule. This gives \(5^{6} * 2^{8}\) from the first part. Next, combine this with the second part, \(5^{-2} * 2^{5}\). Adding the exponents for the base 5: \(6 + (-2) = 4\). For base 2: \(8 + 5 = 13\). Thus, the final expression simplifies to \(5^4 * 2^{13}\). Option A is incorrect as it miscalculates the exponents. Option B has incorrect exponents and signs. Option D introduces an unnecessary negative sign and does not match the simplified expression.
To simplify the expression \(((5^3 * 2^4)^2)(5^{-2} * 2^5)\), first apply the power of a product rule. This gives \(5^{6} * 2^{8}\) from the first part. Next, combine this with the second part, \(5^{-2} * 2^{5}\). Adding the exponents for the base 5: \(6 + (-2) = 4\). For base 2: \(8 + 5 = 13\). Thus, the final expression simplifies to \(5^4 * 2^{13}\). Option A is incorrect as it miscalculates the exponents. Option B has incorrect exponents and signs. Option D introduces an unnecessary negative sign and does not match the simplified expression.
On Monday; Alicia buys x shirts at $8 each and y slacks at $25 each. On Wednesday, Alicia returns 2 pairs of slacks. Which expression represents the total value of her purchases?
- A. 8x + 23y
- B. 8x + 25(y - 2)
- C. 8x - 2) + 25y
- D. 8x + 25y - 2
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To calculate the total value of Alicia's purchases, we need to account for the cost of shirts and slacks, as well as the return of 2 pairs of slacks. Option B, \(8x + 25(y - 2)\), correctly reflects the initial cost of \(x\) shirts at $8 each and \(y\) slacks at $25 each, while subtracting the cost of the 2 returned slacks, which is \(2 \times 25\). Option A, \(8x + 23y\), incorrectly reduces the price of slacks to $23, which is not stated in the problem. Option C, \(8x - 2 + 25y\), miscalculates by subtracting $2 instead of the cost of the returned slacks. Option D, \(8x + 25y - 2\), also incorrectly subtracts $2 instead of the total cost of the slacks returned.
To calculate the total value of Alicia's purchases, we need to account for the cost of shirts and slacks, as well as the return of 2 pairs of slacks. Option B, \(8x + 25(y - 2)\), correctly reflects the initial cost of \(x\) shirts at $8 each and \(y\) slacks at $25 each, while subtracting the cost of the 2 returned slacks, which is \(2 \times 25\). Option A, \(8x + 23y\), incorrectly reduces the price of slacks to $23, which is not stated in the problem. Option C, \(8x - 2 + 25y\), miscalculates by subtracting $2 instead of the cost of the returned slacks. Option D, \(8x + 25y - 2\), also incorrectly subtracts $2 instead of the total cost of the slacks returned.
Daniel is planning to buy his first house. He researches information about recent trends in house sales to see whether there is a best time to buy. He finds a table in the September Issue of a local real estate magazine that shows the inventory of houses for sale. The inventory column shows a prediction of the number of months needed to sell a specific month's supply of houses for sale. The table also shows the median sales price for houses each month.
Daniel wonders whether housing prices are more likely to increase or decrease in any special month. If he randomly selects a month other than January from the table, what is the price as a fraction, that the median sales price in that month was an increase over the previous month?
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: 4\7
To determine the fraction of months where the median sales price increased over the previous month, one must analyze the data presented in the table. The correct answer, 4/7, indicates that out of the seven months considered (excluding January), there were four months where prices rose compared to the month prior. Other options, such as 3/7 or 5/7, misrepresent the data by either underestimating or overestimating the actual increases. A fraction of 3/7 would imply that only three months saw an increase, which contradicts the evidence. Similarly, 5/7 would suggest an unrealistic majority of months experienced price hikes, not aligning with the data. Thus, 4/7 accurately reflects the observed trends in the provided data.
To determine the fraction of months where the median sales price increased over the previous month, one must analyze the data presented in the table. The correct answer, 4/7, indicates that out of the seven months considered (excluding January), there were four months where prices rose compared to the month prior. Other options, such as 3/7 or 5/7, misrepresent the data by either underestimating or overestimating the actual increases. A fraction of 3/7 would imply that only three months saw an increase, which contradicts the evidence. Similarly, 5/7 would suggest an unrealistic majority of months experienced price hikes, not aligning with the data. Thus, 4/7 accurately reflects the observed trends in the provided data.