United States Territorial Expansion
This information describes the history of territorial expansion of the United States.
1 An 1845 magazine article claimed that other nations have undertaken to intrude themselves into it [U.S, territorial expansion], ... for the avowed object of thwarting our policy and hampering our power, limiting our greatness and, checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." The concept of the United States having a manifest destiny promoted the idea that territorial expansion was necessary and inevitable.
2. Past territorial acquisitions contributed to this belief. The 1783 Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War and moved the nation's western border to the Mississippi River. The Louisiana Purchase doubled the size of the country. The Treaty of 1818 established the 49th parallel as the border between the U.S. and Canada. Che year later, Spanish cessions gave the nation territory on the Gulf of Mexico and
3 One year after the magazine article, a treaty with Great Britain divided the disputed Oregon Territory and extended the U.S. Canadian border along the 49th parallel. The signing of an 1848 treaty ended a war and added territory that would eventually make up all or part of seven western states. With the purchase of a nearly 30,000 square mile portion of Mexico in 1853, the borders of the continental United States were set.
After the Revolutionary War, the western border of the United States was the
- A. Mississippi River.
- B. Gulf of Mexico.
- C. Rocky Mountains.
- D. Great Lakes.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The western border of the United States after the Revolutionary War was defined by the Mississippi River, which served as a natural boundary facilitating westward expansion. Option B, the Gulf of Mexico, is incorrect as it is located to the south, not marking the western border. Option C, the Rocky Mountains, is also inaccurate; while they are a significant geographical feature, they were not recognized as a border at that time. Option D, the Great Lakes, pertains to the northern boundary and does not represent the western limit. Thus, the Mississippi River accurately reflects the western boundary post-war.
The western border of the United States after the Revolutionary War was defined by the Mississippi River, which served as a natural boundary facilitating westward expansion. Option B, the Gulf of Mexico, is incorrect as it is located to the south, not marking the western border. Option C, the Rocky Mountains, is also inaccurate; while they are a significant geographical feature, they were not recognized as a border at that time. Option D, the Great Lakes, pertains to the northern boundary and does not represent the western limit. Thus, the Mississippi River accurately reflects the western boundary post-war.
Other Related Questions
Assume that the state of Kansas passed a law limiting the number of hours teenagers could work on farms, and the state's farmers challenged the law. The decision in which of these cases could be cited in support of Kansas's law?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt
- B. Muller v. Oregon
- C. Brown v. Board of Education
- D. Engel v. Vitale
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
What is this labor market's equilibrium wage rate?
- A. $4 per hour
- B. $8 per hour
- C. $12 per hour
- D. $16 per hour
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
In a labor market, the equilibrium wage rate occurs where the quantity of labor supplied equals the quantity of labor demanded. Option C, $12 per hour, represents this balance, reflecting conditions where employers are willing to hire the same number of workers that job seekers are willing to accept. Option A, $4 per hour, is too low, leading to a surplus of labor as more workers seek jobs than employers are willing to hire. Option B, $8 per hour, may still create an imbalance, as it might not attract enough skilled workers. Option D, $16 per hour, is likely too high, resulting in a labor shortage as fewer employers can afford to pay that rate. Thus, $12 per hour is the optimal equilibrium wage.
In a labor market, the equilibrium wage rate occurs where the quantity of labor supplied equals the quantity of labor demanded. Option C, $12 per hour, represents this balance, reflecting conditions where employers are willing to hire the same number of workers that job seekers are willing to accept. Option A, $4 per hour, is too low, leading to a surplus of labor as more workers seek jobs than employers are willing to hire. Option B, $8 per hour, may still create an imbalance, as it might not attract enough skilled workers. Option D, $16 per hour, is likely too high, resulting in a labor shortage as fewer employers can afford to pay that rate. Thus, $12 per hour is the optimal equilibrium wage.
What does it mean if a bank's advertisement for a certificate of deposit (CD) indicates a 4% APY?
- A. The CD matures at the rate of 4% each year.
- B. Only 4% of the CD's value can be withdrawn in any given year.
- C. You will pay 4% of the CD's value each year in service fees.
- D. The CD will earn 4% interest each year that is then added to the CD's balance.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
An advertisement indicating a 4% APY (Annual Percentage Yield) signifies that the CD will earn 4% interest annually, which is compounded and added to the CD's balance. Option A misinterprets APY; it does not refer to maturity but to interest earnings. Option B incorrectly suggests a withdrawal limit based on a percentage, which is not how CDs function. Option C mistakenly implies that there are service fees amounting to 4%, which is unrelated to APY. Understanding APY is crucial for evaluating the growth potential of a CD investment.
An advertisement indicating a 4% APY (Annual Percentage Yield) signifies that the CD will earn 4% interest annually, which is compounded and added to the CD's balance. Option A misinterprets APY; it does not refer to maturity but to interest earnings. Option B incorrectly suggests a withdrawal limit based on a percentage, which is not how CDs function. Option C mistakenly implies that there are service fees amounting to 4%, which is unrelated to APY. Understanding APY is crucial for evaluating the growth potential of a CD investment.
Which of these statements best describes the difference between Commonwealth v. Hunt and Muller v. Oregon?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to education cases, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to issues of labor relations.
- B. Commonwealth v. Hunt is relevant only to labor issues, while Muller v. Oregon is relevant only to free speech issues.
- C. Both cases deal with labor issues; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon gives businesses the right to challenge unions' demands.
- D. Both cases deal with labor cases; Commonwealth v. Hunt allows the existence of labor unions, while Muller v. Oregon supports state regulation of working hours for women.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.
Both cases address labor issues but focus on different aspects. Commonwealth v. Hunt established that labor unions are legal and can organize, promoting workers' rights. In contrast, Muller v. Oregon upheld state regulations on women's working hours, emphasizing the government's role in protecting workers' welfare. Option A incorrectly limits Commonwealth v. Hunt to education cases, while B misrepresents both cases by suggesting they only concern labor and free speech issues. Option C inaccurately implies that Muller v. Oregon allows businesses to challenge unions, which is not its focus.