The St. Louis
This passage describes the journey of the ship St. Louis, which attempted to leave Germany with immigrants wishing to escape Nazi rule.
1 in January, 1933, Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany. The country's first concentration camp opened two months later, to be followed by many more. They were originally built to house "enemies of the state" that threatened Nazi political control or were accused of socially deviant behavior. But when side-scale arrests of Jewish German and Austrian citizens began after Germany's annexation of Austria in 1938, many of these individuals were sent to the camps. A growing number of Germany's Jewish population, fearful of increasing anti-Semitism, left or tried to eave Germany.
2. A few months before the start of World War II, the ship St. Louis left Hamburg, Germany, with 937 passengers, mostly Jewish refugees. Headed to Havana, Cuba, they were unaware that Cuba's president had invalidated all recently issued landing certificates. He claimed certificates had been sold by a corrupt government official. Although most of the St. Louis passengers had applied for U.S. visas and planned to be in Cuba only temporarily, they now faced an uncertain future.
3 When the ship arrived in Havana, the Cuban government refused to allow 908 of the passengers to leave the ship. After six days the ship was ordered to leave Cuba. It began a slow, 4 day journey along the Cuba and Florida coasts, the passengers hoping they would be permitted to enter the United States. Direct appeals were made to President Roosevelt, but he and State Department officials decided to not take any special exceptions for the passengers. Immigration at the time was strictly limited by quotas established in the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1924. The German-Austrian immigration limit of 27,370 for 1939 had been quickly filled.
4 The St. Louis headed back to Europe but not to Germany. Jewish organizations
Why were most of the passengers denied permission to enter Cuba?
- A. Cuba had already accepted all the refugees it could for that year.
- B. Cuba and Germany did not have diplomatic relations at that time.
- C. Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally.
- D. It was feared that admitting them would create tension with Germany.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
Most passengers were denied entry because Cuba's president claimed their documents had been obtained illegally. This assertion directly impacted the legitimacy of their entry, making it a crucial reason for their denial. Option A is incorrect as it implies a quota issue rather than a legal matter. Option B is misleading; while diplomatic relations may affect policies, they were not the primary reason for the denial in this context. Option D suggests geopolitical concerns, but the immediate issue was the legality of the passengers’ documentation, which was the decisive factor in their rejection.
Other Related Questions
Which amendment has been interpreted to mean that a police officer must get permission from the courts before entering the home of a suspected criminal?
- A. Amendment 1
- B. Amendment 4
- C. Amendment 5
- D. Amendment 6
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before entering a home. This ensures privacy and security within one’s dwelling. Option A, the First Amendment, focuses on freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly, not search and seizure. Option C, the Fifth Amendment, addresses rights related to self-incrimination and due process, while Option D, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees the right to a fair trial and legal counsel. None of these amendments pertain to the requirement for police to obtain permission to enter a home.
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before entering a home. This ensures privacy and security within one’s dwelling. Option A, the First Amendment, focuses on freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly, not search and seizure. Option C, the Fifth Amendment, addresses rights related to self-incrimination and due process, while Option D, the Sixth Amendment, guarantees the right to a fair trial and legal counsel. None of these amendments pertain to the requirement for police to obtain permission to enter a home.
Which policy would be most effective to increase Grand Coast's comparative advantage over Toland?
- A. Raise taxes on factories and mills
- B. Encourage more workers to pursue fishing
- C. Maintain spending on infrastructure projects
- D. Improve technology used to produce timber
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Encouraging more workers to pursue fishing enhances Grand Coast's comparative advantage by capitalizing on its natural resources and existing industry strengths. This shift allows for specialization, leading to increased efficiency and production in fishing, where Grand Coast may already excel compared to Toland. Raising taxes on factories and mills (A) could deter investment and reduce manufacturing output, weakening economic competitiveness. Maintaining spending on infrastructure projects (C) may improve overall economic conditions but does not directly target enhancing comparative advantage. Improving technology for timber production (D) could be beneficial but may not align with Grand Coast's most advantageous industries compared to fishing.
Encouraging more workers to pursue fishing enhances Grand Coast's comparative advantage by capitalizing on its natural resources and existing industry strengths. This shift allows for specialization, leading to increased efficiency and production in fishing, where Grand Coast may already excel compared to Toland. Raising taxes on factories and mills (A) could deter investment and reduce manufacturing output, weakening economic competitiveness. Maintaining spending on infrastructure projects (C) may improve overall economic conditions but does not directly target enhancing comparative advantage. Improving technology for timber production (D) could be beneficial but may not align with Grand Coast's most advantageous industries compared to fishing.
Assume that the state of Kansas passed a law limiting the number of hours teenagers could work on farms, and the state's farmers challenged the law. The decision in which of these cases could be cited in support of Kansas's law?
- A. Commonwealth v. Hunt
- B. Muller v. Oregon
- C. Brown v. Board of Education
- D. Engel v. Vitale
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
Muller v. Oregon upheld the state's ability to regulate working hours for women, emphasizing the government's role in protecting public welfare. This precedent supports Kansas's law limiting teenage work hours on farms, as it aligns with the principle of safeguarding minors' health and well-being. Commonwealth v. Hunt dealt with labor unions and the right to organize, which does not pertain to youth labor regulations. Brown v. Board of Education focused on desegregation in schools, irrelevant to labor laws. Engel v. Vitale addressed school prayer, having no connection to employment issues. Thus, only Muller v. Oregon directly supports the rationale for Kansas's law.
What is this labor market's equilibrium labor quantity?
- A. 2,000 hours per month
- B. 3,000 hours per month
- C. 4,000 hours per month
- D. 5,000 hours per month
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
In this labor market, the equilibrium labor quantity occurs where the supply of labor equals the demand for labor. Option C, 4,000 hours per month, represents this balance, indicating that employers are willing to hire this amount at the prevailing wage. Option A (2,000 hours) suggests underemployment, where labor supply exceeds demand, leading to inefficiencies. Option B (3,000 hours) may indicate a slight imbalance, as demand has not fully met supply. Option D (5,000 hours) reflects an oversupply of labor, resulting in unemployment, as demand cannot accommodate this quantity. Thus, 4,000 hours is the optimal equilibrium point.
In this labor market, the equilibrium labor quantity occurs where the supply of labor equals the demand for labor. Option C, 4,000 hours per month, represents this balance, indicating that employers are willing to hire this amount at the prevailing wage. Option A (2,000 hours) suggests underemployment, where labor supply exceeds demand, leading to inefficiencies. Option B (3,000 hours) may indicate a slight imbalance, as demand has not fully met supply. Option D (5,000 hours) reflects an oversupply of labor, resulting in unemployment, as demand cannot accommodate this quantity. Thus, 4,000 hours is the optimal equilibrium point.