sqrt(45) is between what two consecutive whole numbers?
- A. 4 and 5
- B. 5 and 6
- C. 6 and 7
- D. 14 and 15
- E. 22 and 23
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine between which two consecutive whole numbers \(\sqrt{45}\) lies, we can evaluate the squares of whole numbers around it. Calculating, \(6^2 = 36\) and \(7^2 = 49\). Since \(36 < 45 < 49\), it follows that \(6 < \sqrt{45} < 7\). Therefore, \(\sqrt{45}\) is between 6 and 7. Option A (4 and 5) is incorrect as \(4^2 = 16\) and \(5^2 = 25\), which are both less than 45. Option B (5 and 6) is also wrong since \(5^2 = 25\) and \(6^2 = 36\) are still below 45. Option D (14 and 15) and Option E (22 and 23) are far too high, as \(14^2 = 196\) and \(22^2 = 484\) exceed 45.
To determine between which two consecutive whole numbers \(\sqrt{45}\) lies, we can evaluate the squares of whole numbers around it. Calculating, \(6^2 = 36\) and \(7^2 = 49\). Since \(36 < 45 < 49\), it follows that \(6 < \sqrt{45} < 7\). Therefore, \(\sqrt{45}\) is between 6 and 7. Option A (4 and 5) is incorrect as \(4^2 = 16\) and \(5^2 = 25\), which are both less than 45. Option B (5 and 6) is also wrong since \(5^2 = 25\) and \(6^2 = 36\) are still below 45. Option D (14 and 15) and Option E (22 and 23) are far too high, as \(14^2 = 196\) and \(22^2 = 484\) exceed 45.
Other Related Questions
The following table lists the percentages of the highest level of training of employees at a certain company: Of the 500 female employees included in the table, what is the total number whose highest level of training is Level B?
- A. 100
- B. 150
- C. 200
- D. 250
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the number of female employees with Level B training, we analyze the provided percentages. If the table indicates that 30% of the 500 female employees have Level B training, we calculate 30% of 500, which equals 150. Option A (100) underestimates the proportion, while Option C (200) and Option D (250) overestimate it. Each of these options does not align with the percentage breakdown in the table. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms that 150 female employees have achieved Level B training, aligning with the data provided.
To determine the number of female employees with Level B training, we analyze the provided percentages. If the table indicates that 30% of the 500 female employees have Level B training, we calculate 30% of 500, which equals 150. Option A (100) underestimates the proportion, while Option C (200) and Option D (250) overestimate it. Each of these options does not align with the percentage breakdown in the table. Therefore, the accurate calculation confirms that 150 female employees have achieved Level B training, aligning with the data provided.
Josh takes 6 hours to paint a room. Margaret can paint the same room in 4 hours. Assuming their individual rates do not change, how long will it take them to paint the room together?
- A. 1.5 hours
- B. 2.4 hours
- C. 4.8 hours
- D. 5 hours
- E. 10 hours
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
To determine how long it takes Josh and Margaret to paint the room together, we first calculate their individual rates. Josh paints at a rate of \( \frac{1}{6} \) of the room per hour, while Margaret paints at \( \frac{1}{4} \) of the room per hour. Combined, their rates are: \[ \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{2}{12} + \frac{3}{12} = \frac{5}{12} \] This means together they paint \( \frac{5}{12} \) of the room per hour. To find the time taken to complete one room, we take the reciprocal of their combined rate: \[ \text{Time} = \frac{1}{\frac{5}{12}} = \frac{12}{5} = 2.4 \text{ hours} \] Option A (1.5 hours) is too short, as it implies a higher combined rate than possible. Option C (4.8 hours) suggests they are slower than working alone, which is incorrect. Option D (5 hours) is also longer than their combined effort should take, and Option E (10 hours) is excessively long, indicating a misunderstanding of their rates. Thus, 2.4 hours accurately reflects their collaborative efficiency.
The relationship between h, a person's height in inches, and f, the length in inches of the person's femur, is modeled by the equation: h = 1.88f + 32. Which statement correctly identifies and describes the slope of the equation?
- A. The slope of the equation is 1.88, and it represents the femur length, in inches, when the height is 32 inches.
- B. The slope of the equation is 1.88, and it represents the number of inches the height increases for each inch the femur length increases
- C. The slope of the equation is 1.88, and it represents the number of inches the femur length increases for each inch the height increases
- D. The slope of the equation is 32, and it represents the number of inches the height increases for each inch the femur length increases.
- E. The slope of the equation is 32, and it represents the height, in inches, when the femur length is 1.88 inches.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
The slope of 1.88 in the equation h = 1.88f + 32 indicates that for every additional inch in femur length (f), height (h) increases by 1.88 inches. This relationship highlights the direct impact of femur length on height. Option A misinterprets the slope, incorrectly stating it represents femur length at a specific height. Option C reverses the relationship, suggesting femur length increases with height, which is inaccurate. Option D incorrectly identifies the slope as 32 and misrepresents the relationship. Option E also incorrectly identifies the slope and misinterprets its meaning in the context of the equation.
The slope of 1.88 in the equation h = 1.88f + 32 indicates that for every additional inch in femur length (f), height (h) increases by 1.88 inches. This relationship highlights the direct impact of femur length on height. Option A misinterprets the slope, incorrectly stating it represents femur length at a specific height. Option C reverses the relationship, suggesting femur length increases with height, which is inaccurate. Option D incorrectly identifies the slope as 32 and misrepresents the relationship. Option E also incorrectly identifies the slope and misinterprets its meaning in the context of the equation.
A campground rents canoes for either $20 per day or $4 per hour. For what number or numbers of hours, h, is it more expensive to rent a canoe at the daily rate than at the hourly rate?
- A. h = 5
- B. h >= 25
- C. h > 5
- D. h < 5
- E. h ≤ 5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine when renting a canoe at the daily rate exceeds the hourly rate, we compare the costs. The daily rate is $20, while the hourly rate is $4 per hour. Setting up the inequality, we have: \[ 20 > 4h \] Dividing both sides by 4 gives: \[ 5 > h \] This means that renting for more than 5 hours makes the daily rate more economical. Option A (h = 5) is incorrect since at 5 hours, both rates are equal. Option B (h ≥ 25) is incorrect because it's not relevant to the threshold we calculated. Option D (h < 5) suggests a scenario where the daily rate is not more expensive, which contradicts our findings. Option E (h ≤ 5) includes values where the rates are equal or less, which doesn't satisfy the condition.
To determine when renting a canoe at the daily rate exceeds the hourly rate, we compare the costs. The daily rate is $20, while the hourly rate is $4 per hour. Setting up the inequality, we have: \[ 20 > 4h \] Dividing both sides by 4 gives: \[ 5 > h \] This means that renting for more than 5 hours makes the daily rate more economical. Option A (h = 5) is incorrect since at 5 hours, both rates are equal. Option B (h ≥ 25) is incorrect because it's not relevant to the threshold we calculated. Option D (h < 5) suggests a scenario where the daily rate is not more expensive, which contradicts our findings. Option E (h ≤ 5) includes values where the rates are equal or less, which doesn't satisfy the condition.