The following passage is titled "Where Do Old Satellites Go When They Die?" by NASA. Like every other machine, satellites do not last forever. Whether their job is to observe weather, measure greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, or point away from Earth to study the stars, eventually all satellites grow old, wear out, and die, just like old washing machines and vacuum cleaners. So what happens when a trusty satellite's time has come? These days there are two choices, depending on how high the satellite is. For the closer satellites, engineers will use its last bit of fuel to slow it down. That way, it will fall out of orbit and burn up in the atmosphere. The second choice is to send the satellite even farther away from Earth. It can take a lot of fuel for a satellite to slow down enough to fall back into the atmosphere. That is especially true if a satellite is in a very high orbit. For many of these high satellites, it takes less fuel to blast it farther into space than to send it back to Earth.
The author supports the claim that satellites do not last forever through the use of which of the following?
- A. An anecdote about why satellites stop working when they do
- B. Examples of the ways satellites stop working over time
- C. A comparison of satellites to other common machines that stop working
- D. Suggestions for ways to keep satellites working over time
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The author effectively demonstrates that satellites do not last forever by comparing them to other common machines that also have limited lifespans. This comparison highlights the inevitability of wear and tear in technology, providing a relatable context for readers. Option A, an anecdote, may illustrate a specific instance but lacks the broader applicability needed to support the claim. Option B provides examples of satellite failures but does not frame them within a comparative context that strengthens the argument. Option D suggests preventive measures but does not address the inherent limitations of satellites, which is central to the claim.
The author effectively demonstrates that satellites do not last forever by comparing them to other common machines that also have limited lifespans. This comparison highlights the inevitability of wear and tear in technology, providing a relatable context for readers. Option A, an anecdote, may illustrate a specific instance but lacks the broader applicability needed to support the claim. Option B provides examples of satellite failures but does not frame them within a comparative context that strengthens the argument. Option D suggests preventive measures but does not address the inherent limitations of satellites, which is central to the claim.
Other Related Questions
When evaluating the student's writing, the teacher should highlight which of the following as a strength?
- A. A clear focus in paragraph 1
- B. Coherent development of ideas in paragraph 2
- C. A clear transition between the paragraphs
- D. Effective use of figurative language in both paragraphs
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Highlighting the coherent development of ideas in paragraph 2 emphasizes the student's ability to organize and elaborate on their thoughts effectively, which is crucial for persuasive and analytical writing. Option A, while important, only addresses focus in a single paragraph, lacking the depth of development seen in option B. Option C, though valuable, pertains to transitions, which are secondary to the overall idea development. Option D focuses on figurative language, which, while creative, may not contribute as significantly to the clarity and logic of the argument as the coherent development of ideas does.
Highlighting the coherent development of ideas in paragraph 2 emphasizes the student's ability to organize and elaborate on their thoughts effectively, which is crucial for persuasive and analytical writing. Option A, while important, only addresses focus in a single paragraph, lacking the depth of development seen in option B. Option C, though valuable, pertains to transitions, which are secondary to the overall idea development. Option D focuses on figurative language, which, while creative, may not contribute as significantly to the clarity and logic of the argument as the coherent development of ideas does.
Which of the following is the best description of repeated reading as an instructional strategy?
- A. A student reads a passage aloud with corrections until he or she can read it fluently.
- B. A teacher reads a passage aloud until the student feels comfortable enough to attempt it.
- C. A student independently reads a passage aloud two to three times to demonstrate mastery.
- D. A teacher reads a passage aloud one line at a time with the student repeating each line.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Repeated reading involves a student independently reading a passage multiple times to achieve fluency and comprehension, making option C the best description. This strategy allows learners to practice and reinforce their skills, leading to improved reading proficiency. Option A incorrectly emphasizes the role of corrections during reading, which can detract from fluency. Option B focuses on teacher-led reading, which does not align with the independent practice central to repeated reading. Option D suggests a choral approach, which may not provide the same level of individual practice necessary for mastery.
Repeated reading involves a student independently reading a passage multiple times to achieve fluency and comprehension, making option C the best description. This strategy allows learners to practice and reinforce their skills, leading to improved reading proficiency. Option A incorrectly emphasizes the role of corrections during reading, which can detract from fluency. Option B focuses on teacher-led reading, which does not align with the independent practice central to repeated reading. Option D suggests a choral approach, which may not provide the same level of individual practice necessary for mastery.
Which of the following statements expresses a main idea of the entire passage?
- A. When satellites stop working, they have to be moved from orbit.
- B. Satellites are sent to orbit Earth for many different purposes.
- C. After satellites are slowed down, they burn up in the atmosphere.
- D. Satellites are designed to work for only a limited amount of time.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively captures the main idea by emphasizing the necessity of relocating non-functional satellites, highlighting a critical aspect of their lifecycle. Option B, while relevant, only addresses the initial purpose of satellites rather than their entire operational journey. Option C discusses a specific consequence of satellites slowing down, which is too narrow to represent the overall theme. Option D mentions the limited lifespan of satellites but does not encompass the broader implications of their eventual decommissioning and the need for orbital management.
Option A effectively captures the main idea by emphasizing the necessity of relocating non-functional satellites, highlighting a critical aspect of their lifecycle. Option B, while relevant, only addresses the initial purpose of satellites rather than their entire operational journey. Option C discusses a specific consequence of satellites slowing down, which is too narrow to represent the overall theme. Option D mentions the limited lifespan of satellites but does not encompass the broader implications of their eventual decommissioning and the need for orbital management.
The collaboration activity is known as
- A. think-pair-share
- B. literature circles
- C. fishbowl discussion
- D. jigsaw strategy
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.