This table contains data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
What was the mean population across the British American colonies in 1700?
- A. 56,000
- B. 21,000
- C. 6,000
- D. 16,000
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
In 1700, the mean population across the British American colonies was approximately 16,000. This figure reflects the early colonial growth and settlement patterns during that period. Option A (56,000) overestimates the population, as it does not account for the smaller settlements and rural areas that characterized the colonies at that time. Option B (21,000) is also too high, misrepresenting the demographic data available for the early 18th century. Option C (6,000) significantly underestimates the population, ignoring the established colonies with growing communities. Thus, D accurately represents the mean population based on historical records.
In 1700, the mean population across the British American colonies was approximately 16,000. This figure reflects the early colonial growth and settlement patterns during that period. Option A (56,000) overestimates the population, as it does not account for the smaller settlements and rural areas that characterized the colonies at that time. Option B (21,000) is also too high, misrepresenting the demographic data available for the early 18th century. Option C (6,000) significantly underestimates the population, ignoring the established colonies with growing communities. Thus, D accurately represents the mean population based on historical records.
Other Related Questions
The United States fought in World War II from 1941 to 1945. Which statement explains the peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s?
- A. Consumer demand increased due to the end of rationing.
- B. Manufacturing decreased because of less demand for weapons.
- C. Government spending increased due to national defense.
- D. Wages decreased because of competition for scarce jobs.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s can be attributed to increased government spending due to national defense efforts. This surge in spending stimulated the economy and raised prices as the demand for goods and services outpaced supply. Option A is incorrect; while consumer demand did rise post-rationing, it was not the primary driver of inflation during the war years. Option B is also wrong, as manufacturing actually increased during the war to meet military needs. Option D misrepresents the labor market; wages generally rose due to high demand for workers, not decreased. Thus, government spending for defense was the key factor in driving inflation during this period.
The peak annual inflation rate during the 1940s can be attributed to increased government spending due to national defense efforts. This surge in spending stimulated the economy and raised prices as the demand for goods and services outpaced supply. Option A is incorrect; while consumer demand did rise post-rationing, it was not the primary driver of inflation during the war years. Option B is also wrong, as manufacturing actually increased during the war to meet military needs. Option D misrepresents the labor market; wages generally rose due to high demand for workers, not decreased. Thus, government spending for defense was the key factor in driving inflation during this period.
Based on the timeline and the map, what was one way African Americans dealt with Jim Crow laws?
- A. by taking service jobs in southern cities
- B. by seeking factory jobs in urban areas of the North
- C. by becoming tenant farmers in other parts of the South
- D. by gaining technical skills in northern schools
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
African Americans responded to Jim Crow laws by seeking factory jobs in urban areas of the North, as this migration offered better economic opportunities and a chance to escape oppressive conditions in the South. Option A, taking service jobs in southern cities, often perpetuated the same discriminatory practices found under Jim Crow. Option C, becoming tenant farmers in other parts of the South, did not provide significant relief from the systemic racism and economic hardship prevalent in that region. Option D, gaining technical skills in northern schools, while beneficial, was not a widespread or immediate solution compared to the mass migration to northern factories.
African Americans responded to Jim Crow laws by seeking factory jobs in urban areas of the North, as this migration offered better economic opportunities and a chance to escape oppressive conditions in the South. Option A, taking service jobs in southern cities, often perpetuated the same discriminatory practices found under Jim Crow. Option C, becoming tenant farmers in other parts of the South, did not provide significant relief from the systemic racism and economic hardship prevalent in that region. Option D, gaining technical skills in northern schools, while beneficial, was not a widespread or immediate solution compared to the mass migration to northern factories.
How did the position expressed by President Johnson differ from the position expressed by Senator Russell?
- A. Only Senator Russell said that state governments were sufficiently protecting the rights of citizens.
- B. Only Senator Russell supported the federal government's intervention.
- C. Only President Johnson supported the state governments' rights to manage their own affairs.
- D. Only President Johnson believed that the federal government was authorized to intervene.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
President Johnson emphasized the need for federal intervention to protect citizens' rights, believing that state governments were often inadequate. In contrast, Senator Russell argued that state governments were effectively safeguarding those rights, reflecting a stance of local governance. Option B is incorrect because Senator Russell did not support federal intervention. Option C misrepresents Johnson’s position; he favored federal oversight rather than state autonomy. Option D inaccurately attributes the belief in federal authority solely to Johnson, as Russell did not share this view. Thus, the distinction lies in Russell's confidence in state governments versus Johnson's call for federal action.
According to the information in the first graph, which statement correctly describes the period from 2006 to 2008?
- A. Gross farm income continued the decline that had characterized previous years.
- B. Gross farm income increased despite increases in production costs.
- C. Increases in production costs caused gross farm income to decline.
- D. Decreases in production costs continued throughout this period.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
During the period from 2006 to 2008, gross farm income saw an increase, even as production costs rose. This indicates that farmers managed to offset higher expenses with increased revenue. Option A is incorrect as it suggests a continuation of decline, which contradicts the data showing growth in income. Option C misinterprets the relationship between rising costs and income, as income actually increased despite those costs. Option D is inaccurate because it implies a consistent decrease in production costs, which is not supported by the graph indicating rising expenses during this timeframe.
During the period from 2006 to 2008, gross farm income saw an increase, even as production costs rose. This indicates that farmers managed to offset higher expenses with increased revenue. Option A is incorrect as it suggests a continuation of decline, which contradicts the data showing growth in income. Option C misinterprets the relationship between rising costs and income, as income actually increased despite those costs. Option D is inaccurate because it implies a consistent decrease in production costs, which is not supported by the graph indicating rising expenses during this timeframe.