Which of the following words is most decodable?
- A. Always
- B. Stack
- C. Goes
- D. Write
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Decodable words are those that can be sounded out using phonetic rules. Option B, "Stack," is highly decodable as it follows straightforward phonetic patterns: each letter corresponds to a single sound, making it easy to pronounce. Option A, "Always," contains the vowel team "aw" and the silent "w," complicating its pronunciation. Option C, "Goes," includes an irregular vowel sound and a silent "e," which makes it less straightforward to decode. Option D, "Write," features a silent "w" and an irregular vowel sound, further reducing its decodability. Thus, "Stack" stands out as the most easily decodable option.
Decodable words are those that can be sounded out using phonetic rules. Option B, "Stack," is highly decodable as it follows straightforward phonetic patterns: each letter corresponds to a single sound, making it easy to pronounce. Option A, "Always," contains the vowel team "aw" and the silent "w," complicating its pronunciation. Option C, "Goes," includes an irregular vowel sound and a silent "e," which makes it less straightforward to decode. Option D, "Write," features a silent "w" and an irregular vowel sound, further reducing its decodability. Thus, "Stack" stands out as the most easily decodable option.
Other Related Questions
The collaboration activity is known as
- A. think-pair-share
- B. literature circles
- C. fishbowl discussion
- D. jigsaw strategy
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.
The jigsaw strategy effectively promotes collaboration by dividing a topic into sections, allowing each student to become an "expert" on their part and then share their knowledge with peers. This method encourages active participation and fosters a sense of responsibility among students. Think-pair-share (A) involves individual reflection followed by partner discussion, but lacks the comprehensive teamwork aspect. Literature circles (B) focus on reading comprehension in small groups, while fishbowl discussions (C) emphasize observation and participation but do not require the same level of collaborative learning as jigsaw. Each of these methods has its merits, but none match the collaborative depth of the jigsaw strategy.
A student reads a story about a talking puppy who learns a valuable lesson about being a loyal friend. The story's description best matches the characteristics of which of the following types of stories?
- A. Legends
- B. Myths
- C. Tall tales
- D. Fables
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
The story of a talking puppy learning about loyalty aligns with the characteristics of fables, which often feature animals as characters and convey moral lessons. Fables are designed to teach important values in a simple and engaging manner. Legends (A) typically involve historical figures or events and do not focus on moral lessons through animal characters. Myths (B) explain natural phenomena or cultural beliefs, often involving gods or supernatural elements, rather than personal growth. Tall tales (C) are exaggerated stories about real-life characters, emphasizing humor and larger-than-life adventures rather than moral teachings.
The story of a talking puppy learning about loyalty aligns with the characteristics of fables, which often feature animals as characters and convey moral lessons. Fables are designed to teach important values in a simple and engaging manner. Legends (A) typically involve historical figures or events and do not focus on moral lessons through animal characters. Myths (B) explain natural phenomena or cultural beliefs, often involving gods or supernatural elements, rather than personal growth. Tall tales (C) are exaggerated stories about real-life characters, emphasizing humor and larger-than-life adventures rather than moral teachings.
The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year. Which of the following revisions successfully corrects the sentence?
- A. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- B. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and raising twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- C. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and, consequently, to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
- D. The organizers of the fund-raiser expected that at least 500 people would attend; that the keynote speaker would be well received; and to raise twice the amount of money as they did last year.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Option A effectively maintains parallel structure by ensuring all elements in the list follow the same grammatical form: "that at least 500 people would attend, that the keynote speaker would be well received, and that they would raise twice the amount of money." This consistency enhances clarity and coherence. Option B disrupts parallelism by changing "to raise" to "raising," which creates a grammatical inconsistency in the series. Option C introduces "consequently," which unnecessarily complicates the sentence and breaks the parallel structure. Option D uses semicolons incorrectly, as they should separate independent clauses, not items in a list, leading to confusion.
Which of the following most effectively combines the statements above into a single coherent and grammatically correct sentence?
- A. Much of the Great Wall of China, which is actually a network of walls and towers, was built in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
- B. The Great Wall of China, this is actually a network of walls and towers, much of it is built in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
- C. Much of the Great Wall of China, building in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and it is actually a network of walls and towers.
- D. Actually a network of walls and towers, they built much of the Great Wall of China in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A effectively combines the statements into a coherent sentence by using a relative clause ("which is actually a network of walls and towers") to provide additional information about the Great Wall of China without disrupting the main thought. Option B incorrectly uses a comma splice, creating two independent clauses that are improperly joined. Option C introduces a participial phrase that makes the sentence awkward and unclear, failing to maintain grammatical structure. Option D starts with a fragment, lacking a clear subject, and misattributes the building of the wall, leading to confusion about who built it.
Option A effectively combines the statements into a coherent sentence by using a relative clause ("which is actually a network of walls and towers") to provide additional information about the Great Wall of China without disrupting the main thought. Option B incorrectly uses a comma splice, creating two independent clauses that are improperly joined. Option C introduces a participial phrase that makes the sentence awkward and unclear, failing to maintain grammatical structure. Option D starts with a fragment, lacking a clear subject, and misattributes the building of the wall, leading to confusion about who built it.