Equivalent to 2(4f+2g)? Select ALL.
- A. 4*(2f+g)
- B. 4(2f+2g)
- C. 2f(4+2g)
- D. 16f+4g
- E. 8f+2g
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A,F
To determine which expressions are equivalent to \( 2(4f + 2g) \), we first simplify it: \[ 2(4f + 2g) = 8f + 4g \] Now, let's analyze each option: **A: \( 4(2f + g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4g \), matching our simplified expression. **B: \( 4(2f + 2g) \)** This simplifies to \( 8f + 8g \), which does not match \( 8f + 4g \). **C: \( 2f(4 + 2g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4fg \), introducing an extra term \( 4fg \) that makes it unequal. **D: \( 16f + 4g \)** This expression has \( 16f \), which is double the \( 8f \) we expect, thus it is not equivalent. **E: \( 8f + 2g \)** Here, while \( 8f \) matches, \( 2g \) does not equal \( 4g \), making it non-equivalent. **F: \( 8f + 4g \)** This matches our simplified expression exactly, confirming its equivalence. In summary, options A and F correctly represent the original expression, while B, C, D, and E do not.
To determine which expressions are equivalent to \( 2(4f + 2g) \), we first simplify it: \[ 2(4f + 2g) = 8f + 4g \] Now, let's analyze each option: **A: \( 4(2f + g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4g \), matching our simplified expression. **B: \( 4(2f + 2g) \)** This simplifies to \( 8f + 8g \), which does not match \( 8f + 4g \). **C: \( 2f(4 + 2g) \)** This expands to \( 8f + 4fg \), introducing an extra term \( 4fg \) that makes it unequal. **D: \( 16f + 4g \)** This expression has \( 16f \), which is double the \( 8f \) we expect, thus it is not equivalent. **E: \( 8f + 2g \)** Here, while \( 8f \) matches, \( 2g \) does not equal \( 4g \), making it non-equivalent. **F: \( 8f + 4g \)** This matches our simplified expression exactly, confirming its equivalence. In summary, options A and F correctly represent the original expression, while B, C, D, and E do not.
Other Related Questions
Which student wrote the estimate closest to 1,592 + 8?
- A. Isabella
- B. Jayden
- C. Michael
- D. Sarah
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Isabella's estimate of 1,592 + 8 is 1,600, which is closest to the actual sum. This estimation rounds 1,592 to 1,590 and adds 10 for simplicity, yielding 1,600. Jayden likely underestimated or rounded incorrectly, resulting in a less accurate estimate. Michael may have rounded too far or added an incorrect value, leading to a larger discrepancy. Sarah's estimate might not have accounted properly for the addition, causing it to stray further from the actual result. Thus, Isabella’s approach demonstrates the most accurate estimation strategy.
Isabella's estimate of 1,592 + 8 is 1,600, which is closest to the actual sum. This estimation rounds 1,592 to 1,590 and adds 10 for simplicity, yielding 1,600. Jayden likely underestimated or rounded incorrectly, resulting in a less accurate estimate. Michael may have rounded too far or added an incorrect value, leading to a larger discrepancy. Sarah's estimate might not have accounted properly for the addition, causing it to stray further from the actual result. Thus, Isabella’s approach demonstrates the most accurate estimation strategy.
Uniforms: 2 pants, 3 shirts. Add black, maroon. New outfits?
- A. 3
- B. 5
- C. 6
- D. 7
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
To determine the total number of outfits, consider the combinations of pants and shirts. Initially, there are 2 pants and 3 shirts, allowing for 2 x 3 = 6 outfits. Adding black and maroon shirts increases the shirt count to 5 (3 original + 2 new). Now, with 2 pants and 5 shirts, the total combinations become 2 x 5 = 10 outfits. However, it appears there was a misunderstanding in the question regarding the desired combinations. Option A (3) underestimates the combinations, while B (5) does not account for all shirts. Option D (7) also miscalculates the combinations. The correct total is indeed 10, but if we consider only original combinations without the new shirts, the answer is 6.
Joe’s age 4 more than 3x Amy’s. Equation?
- A. A=J/3+4
- B. A=3J+4
- C. J=3A+4
- D. J=3(A+4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
To find the equation representing Joe's age in relation to Amy's, we start with the statement: Joe's age (J) is 4 more than 3 times Amy's age (A). This can be expressed mathematically as J = 3A + 4, which aligns with option C. Option A (A = J/3 + 4) incorrectly suggests that Amy's age is derived from Joe's, which contradicts the relationship given. Option B (A = 3J + 4) misplaces the variables, implying Amy's age is dependent on Joe's in a way that doesn't reflect the original statement. Option D (J = 3(A + 4)) incorrectly adds 4 to Amy's age before multiplying, altering the intended relationship.
Order 0.68, 1/12, 1(1/5), 3/5 least to greatest?
- A. 1(1/5), 0.68, 3/5, 1/12
- B. 1/12, 3/5, 0.68, 1(1/5)
- C. 1/12, 0.68, 3/5, 1(1/5)
- D. 0.68, 1/12, 3/5, 1(1/5)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.
To compare the values, first convert them to a common format. - 1(1/5) equals 1.2. - 0.68 remains as is. - 3/5 converts to 0.6. - 1/12 is approximately 0.0833. Ordering these from least to greatest gives: 1/12 (0.0833), 3/5 (0.6), 0.68, and 1(1/5) (1.2). Option A incorrectly places 1(1/5) first, while C misplaces 3/5 and 0.68. Option D also misorders the values by placing 0.68 before 1/12. Thus, B accurately reflects the correct sequence of values.