Hummingbirds: Last 0,1,2,5,5,6,7,10. This 3,4,5,5.5,7,12,13
Measure changed?
- A. Mean
- B. Median
- C. Mode
- D. Range
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The mean is sensitive to changes in data values, as it considers all values in a dataset. When any value changes, the mean will adjust accordingly, reflecting the new average. The median, on the other hand, represents the middle value and is only affected if the change impacts the central position of the dataset. The mode, being the most frequently occurring value, is not influenced by changes in other data points unless the frequency of occurrence alters. Lastly, the range measures the difference between the highest and lowest values, which may not change if the data alteration occurs within the existing range.
The mean is sensitive to changes in data values, as it considers all values in a dataset. When any value changes, the mean will adjust accordingly, reflecting the new average. The median, on the other hand, represents the middle value and is only affected if the change impacts the central position of the dataset. The mode, being the most frequently occurring value, is not influenced by changes in other data points unless the frequency of occurrence alters. Lastly, the range measures the difference between the highest and lowest values, which may not change if the data alteration occurs within the existing range.
Other Related Questions
Cost of 3 cans of peaches is $2.67. Cost of 8 cans?
- A. $5.34
- B. $7.12
- C. $8.01
- D. $21.36
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
To determine the cost of 8 cans of peaches, first calculate the cost per can. The cost of 3 cans is $2.67, so the cost per can is $2.67 ÷ 3 = $0.89. To find the cost of 8 cans, multiply the cost per can by 8: $0.89 × 8 = $7.12. Option A ($5.34) incorrectly assumes a lower total based on miscalculated per can pricing. Option C ($8.01) slightly overestimates the total, likely from rounding errors. Option D ($21.36) suggests a misunderstanding of basic multiplication, as it implies a much higher price than calculated. Thus, $7.12 accurately reflects the cost for 8 cans.
Shaded region shows?
- A. 3/4 x 1/2
- B. 3/4 x 3/4
- C. 3/4 x 3/2
- D. 3/4 x 3
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
The shaded region represents the area of a rectangle formed by multiplying two fractions. Option A, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{1}{2} \), correctly calculates the area of a rectangle with a length of \( \frac{3}{4} \) and a width of \( \frac{1}{2} \), resulting in \( \frac{3}{8} \). Option B, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{3}{4} \), represents a larger area, \( \frac{9}{16} \), which does not match the shaded region. Option C, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{3}{2} \), yields \( \frac{9}{8} \), exceeding the shaded area. Finally, option D, \( \frac{3}{4} \times 3 \), results in \( \frac{9}{4} \), also too large. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the area of the shaded region.
The shaded region represents the area of a rectangle formed by multiplying two fractions. Option A, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{1}{2} \), correctly calculates the area of a rectangle with a length of \( \frac{3}{4} \) and a width of \( \frac{1}{2} \), resulting in \( \frac{3}{8} \). Option B, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{3}{4} \), represents a larger area, \( \frac{9}{16} \), which does not match the shaded region. Option C, \( \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{3}{2} \), yields \( \frac{9}{8} \), exceeding the shaded area. Finally, option D, \( \frac{3}{4} \times 3 \), results in \( \frac{9}{4} \), also too large. Thus, only option A accurately reflects the area of the shaded region.
Driveway for two cars, width?
- A. 0.7
- B. 7
- C. 70
- D. 700
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
A driveway for two cars typically requires a width of about 7 feet to accommodate standard vehicle sizes comfortably. Option A (0.7) is too narrow, as it would not allow even one car to fit. Option C (70) and Option D (700) are excessively wide for a residential driveway, making them impractical and unnecessary. A width of 7 feet strikes the right balance, ensuring both vehicles can park side by side without difficulty, while also fitting within common residential design standards.
Eraser 20g in mg?
- A. 1.002
- B. 0.02
- C. 2,000
- D. 20
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To convert grams to milligrams, one must remember that 1 gram equals 1,000 milligrams. Therefore, 20 grams can be calculated as follows: 20 g x 1,000 mg/g = 20,000 mg. Option A (1.002 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the conversion. Option B (0.02 mg) is also wrong; it suggests a conversion error by not accounting for the unit scale correctly. Option C (2,000 mg) miscalculates the conversion by a factor of ten. Option D correctly represents 20 grams as 20,000 milligrams, aligning with the proper conversion calculation.
To convert grams to milligrams, one must remember that 1 gram equals 1,000 milligrams. Therefore, 20 grams can be calculated as follows: 20 g x 1,000 mg/g = 20,000 mg. Option A (1.002 mg) is incorrect as it significantly underestimates the conversion. Option B (0.02 mg) is also wrong; it suggests a conversion error by not accounting for the unit scale correctly. Option C (2,000 mg) miscalculates the conversion by a factor of ten. Option D correctly represents 20 grams as 20,000 milligrams, aligning with the proper conversion calculation.