Fred worked 39.5 hours last week. Alice worked 6.75 fewer hours than Fred. How many hours did Alice work?
- A. 33.75 HOURS
- B. 33.25 HOURS
- C. 33.35 HOURS
- D. 33.85 HOURS
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
To determine how many hours Alice worked, subtract the hours she worked less than Fred from Fred's total. Fred worked 39.5 hours, and Alice worked 6.75 hours fewer. Calculating this: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. However, this calculation is incorrect. The correct calculation should be: 39.5 - 6.75 = 32.75 hours. This means option A (33.75 hours) is incorrect. Option B (33.25 hours), C (33.35 hours), and D (33.85 hours) also do not match the correct calculation. Thus, none of the options are correct based on the provided data.
Other Related Questions
Which of the following is equivalent to 8,1/4?
- A. 0.0825
- B. 0.825
- C. 8.25
- D. 82.5
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: c
To convert the mixed number 8 1/4 into an improper fraction, first multiply the whole number (8) by the denominator (4), resulting in 32. Then, add the numerator (1) to get 33, making the improper fraction 33/4. When you divide 33 by 4, you get 8.25. Option A (0.0825) is incorrect as it represents a much smaller value. Option B (0.825) is also incorrect, as it is less than 1. Option D (82.5) is incorrect, being ten times larger than the correct value. Thus, 8.25 accurately reflects the original mixed number.
To convert the mixed number 8 1/4 into an improper fraction, first multiply the whole number (8) by the denominator (4), resulting in 32. Then, add the numerator (1) to get 33, making the improper fraction 33/4. When you divide 33 by 4, you get 8.25. Option A (0.0825) is incorrect as it represents a much smaller value. Option B (0.825) is also incorrect, as it is less than 1. Option D (82.5) is incorrect, being ten times larger than the correct value. Thus, 8.25 accurately reflects the original mixed number.
If 22,1/3% of a number n is 938, then n must be?
- A. 281,400
- B. 42,000
- C. 4,960
- D. 4,200
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
To find the number \( n \), we start by converting \( 22 \frac{1}{3} \% \) to a decimal. This percentage equals \( \frac{67}{3} \% \), or \( \frac{67}{300} \) in decimal form. Setting up the equation \( \frac{67}{300} n = 938 \) allows us to solve for \( n \). Multiplying both sides by \( \frac{300}{67} \) gives \( n = 938 \times \frac{300}{67} = 4,200 \). Option A (281,400) is too high, as it would imply a much larger percentage. Option B (42,000) miscalculates the percentage relation. Option C (4,960) is incorrect, as it does not satisfy the equation derived from the percentage calculation.
2 + (2 × 2) + 2 =
- A. 8
- B. 10
- C. 12
- D. 16
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To solve the expression 2 + (2 × 2) + 2, it’s essential to follow the order of operations, often remembered by the acronym PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction). First, calculate the value inside the parentheses: 2 × 2 equals 4. Next, substitute this back into the expression: 2 + 4 + 2. Then, perform the addition from left to right: 2 + 4 equals 6, and then 6 + 2 equals 8. Options B (10), C (12), and D (16) are incorrect because they do not adhere to the proper order of operations or miscalculate the addition steps.
To solve the expression 2 + (2 × 2) + 2, it’s essential to follow the order of operations, often remembered by the acronym PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction). First, calculate the value inside the parentheses: 2 × 2 equals 4. Next, substitute this back into the expression: 2 + 4 + 2. Then, perform the addition from left to right: 2 + 4 equals 6, and then 6 + 2 equals 8. Options B (10), C (12), and D (16) are incorrect because they do not adhere to the proper order of operations or miscalculate the addition steps.
Of the following, which is closest to 17/6 + 6/17 ?
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. 23
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.
To solve 17/6 + 6/17, we first find a common denominator, which is 102. Rewriting the fractions gives us (17*17)/(6*17) + (6*6)/(17*6) = 289/102 + 36/102 = 325/102. Dividing 325 by 102 yields approximately 3.19, which is closest to 3. Option A (1) is too low, as it does not account for the combined value of the fractions. Option B (2) is still below the calculated sum. Option D (23) is excessively high and not feasible given the values involved. Thus, option C (3) is the most accurate approximation.