Choose the best answer. If necessary, use the paper you were given.
Which of the following is equivalent to 12x +8?
- A. 4(3x+2)
- B. 4(3x+8)
- C. 4(3x+2x)
- D. 20x
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the equivalent expression for \(12x + 8\), we can factor out the greatest common factor, which is 4. Option A, \(4(3x + 2)\), simplifies to \(12x + 8\) when distributed, making it equivalent to the original expression. Option B, \(4(3x + 8)\), simplifies to \(12x + 32\), which is not equivalent. Option C, \(4(3x + 2x)\), simplifies to \(4(5x)\) or \(20x\), which is also not equivalent. Option D, \(20x\), does not match the original expression either. Thus, only option A is correct.
To determine the equivalent expression for \(12x + 8\), we can factor out the greatest common factor, which is 4. Option A, \(4(3x + 2)\), simplifies to \(12x + 8\) when distributed, making it equivalent to the original expression. Option B, \(4(3x + 8)\), simplifies to \(12x + 32\), which is not equivalent. Option C, \(4(3x + 2x)\), simplifies to \(4(5x)\) or \(20x\), which is also not equivalent. Option D, \(20x\), does not match the original expression either. Thus, only option A is correct.
Other Related Questions
An airplane is 5,000 ft above ground and has to land on a runway that is 7,000 ft away as shown above. Let x be the angle the pilot takes to land the airplane at the beginning of the runway. Which equation is a correct way to calculate x?
- A. sin x = 5000/7000
- B. sin x = 7000/5000
- C. tan x = 5000/7000
- D. tan x = 7/5000
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
To determine the angle \( x \) for landing, we need to consider the relationship between the height of the airplane and the distance to the runway. The height (5000 ft) is the opposite side of the right triangle formed, while the distance to the runway (7000 ft) is the adjacent side. The tangent function relates these two sides, hence \( \tan x = \frac{\text{opposite}}{\text{adjacent}} \) leads to \( \tan x = \frac{5000}{7000} \). Option A incorrectly uses the sine function, which relates the opposite side to the hypotenuse. Option B also misapplies sine but swaps the sides, leading to an incorrect ratio. Option D incorrectly uses tangent but misrepresents the sides, making it invalid. Thus, option C accurately represents the relationship needed to calculate angle \( x \).
To determine the angle \( x \) for landing, we need to consider the relationship between the height of the airplane and the distance to the runway. The height (5000 ft) is the opposite side of the right triangle formed, while the distance to the runway (7000 ft) is the adjacent side. The tangent function relates these two sides, hence \( \tan x = \frac{\text{opposite}}{\text{adjacent}} \) leads to \( \tan x = \frac{5000}{7000} \). Option A incorrectly uses the sine function, which relates the opposite side to the hypotenuse. Option B also misapplies sine but swaps the sides, leading to an incorrect ratio. Option D incorrectly uses tangent but misrepresents the sides, making it invalid. Thus, option C accurately represents the relationship needed to calculate angle \( x \).
What is the range of her scores?
- A. 100
- B. 120
- C. 440
- D. 2,250
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To determine the range of her scores, we subtract the lowest score from the highest score. If the highest score is 220 and the lowest is 100, the calculation is 220 - 100 = 120, which represents the range. Option A (100) misrepresents the range as it does not account for the difference between the highest and lowest scores. Option C (440) and Option D (2,250) are excessively high and do not reflect the actual spread of scores based on the provided data. Thus, 120 accurately represents the range of her scores.
To determine the range of her scores, we subtract the lowest score from the highest score. If the highest score is 220 and the lowest is 100, the calculation is 220 - 100 = 120, which represents the range. Option A (100) misrepresents the range as it does not account for the difference between the highest and lowest scores. Option C (440) and Option D (2,250) are excessively high and do not reflect the actual spread of scores based on the provided data. Thus, 120 accurately represents the range of her scores.
The sum of n and the product 3 times n is 12. What is the value of n?
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 4
- D. 4 ½
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
To solve the equation formed by the problem statement, we express it as \( n + 3n = 12 \), which simplifies to \( 4n = 12 \). Dividing both sides by 4 gives \( n = 3 \). Option A (2) does not satisfy the equation, as substituting it results in \( 2 + 6 = 8 \), which is incorrect. Option C (4) leads to \( 4 + 12 = 16 \), also incorrect. Option D (4 ½) results in \( 4.5 + 13.5 = 18 \), which is too high. Thus, only \( n = 3 \) fulfills the original equation, confirming its validity.
To solve the equation formed by the problem statement, we express it as \( n + 3n = 12 \), which simplifies to \( 4n = 12 \). Dividing both sides by 4 gives \( n = 3 \). Option A (2) does not satisfy the equation, as substituting it results in \( 2 + 6 = 8 \), which is incorrect. Option C (4) leads to \( 4 + 12 = 16 \), also incorrect. Option D (4 ½) results in \( 4.5 + 13.5 = 18 \), which is too high. Thus, only \( n = 3 \) fulfills the original equation, confirming its validity.
If the trend shown in the graph above continued into the next year, approximately how many sport utility vehicles were sold in 1999?
- A. 3 million
- B. 2.5 million
- C. 2 million
- D. 3 thousand
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.
To determine the approximate number of sport utility vehicles sold in 1999, analyzing the trend in the graph is essential. If the upward trend continued, sales would likely increase compared to previous years. Given the data, 3 million aligns with the projected growth rate, reflecting a significant rise consistent with market trends. Option B, 2.5 million, underestimates the growth, while C, 2 million, does not account for the upward trajectory. Option D, 3 thousand, is far too low and unrealistic, failing to represent the scale of SUV sales during that period. Thus, 3 million is the most reasonable estimate.