This table contains information from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
What is the mean number of people who became legal residents of the United States during this five-year period?
- A. 1,119,823
- B. 223,504
- C. 5,599,113
- D. 1,107,126
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
To determine the mean number of legal residents over the five-year period, one must sum the total number of residents and divide by five. The correct calculation yields a mean of 1,119,823, reflecting the average annual influx. Option B (223,504) represents a miscalculation, likely reflecting a single year's data rather than an average. Option C (5,599,113) incorrectly totals the residents without division, suggesting a cumulative number rather than an average. Option D (1,107,126) is close but does not accurately reflect the mean, indicating a minor arithmetic error.
To determine the mean number of legal residents over the five-year period, one must sum the total number of residents and divide by five. The correct calculation yields a mean of 1,119,823, reflecting the average annual influx. Option B (223,504) represents a miscalculation, likely reflecting a single year's data rather than an average. Option C (5,599,113) incorrectly totals the residents without division, suggesting a cumulative number rather than an average. Option D (1,107,126) is close but does not accurately reflect the mean, indicating a minor arithmetic error.
Other Related Questions
Which event occurred first?
- A. Michael moved to Ohio.
- B. Michael attained U.S. citizenship.
- C. The IRO was created.
- D. The UN was established.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: D
To determine the sequence of events, it’s essential to consider historical timelines. The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945, laying the groundwork for international cooperation. The International Refugee Organization (IRO) was created shortly after, in 1946, to address post-war refugee issues. Michael attaining U.S. citizenship likely occurred after these events, as it typically follows immigration processes. Lastly, Michael moving to Ohio would depend on his citizenship status and individual circumstances, making it the most recent event in this context.
To determine the sequence of events, it’s essential to consider historical timelines. The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945, laying the groundwork for international cooperation. The International Refugee Organization (IRO) was created shortly after, in 1946, to address post-war refugee issues. Michael attaining U.S. citizenship likely occurred after these events, as it typically follows immigration processes. Lastly, Michael moving to Ohio would depend on his citizenship status and individual circumstances, making it the most recent event in this context.
Which event counters the viewpoint expressed in the newspaper excerpt that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights?
- A. the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments
- B. the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation
- C. the founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
- D. the start of the Great Migration
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) directly counters the viewpoint that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights. Established in 1909, the NAACP actively fought for civil rights through legal challenges, advocacy, and public education, demonstrating a strong commitment to defending their rights. Option A, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, although significant, primarily established legal rights rather than showcasing active defense. Option B, the Emancipation Proclamation, ended slavery but did not directly address civil rights activism. Option D, the Great Migration, reflects a movement for better opportunities but does not specifically illustrate organized efforts to defend civil rights.
The founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) directly counters the viewpoint that African Americans refused to defend their civil rights. Established in 1909, the NAACP actively fought for civil rights through legal challenges, advocacy, and public education, demonstrating a strong commitment to defending their rights. Option A, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, although significant, primarily established legal rights rather than showcasing active defense. Option B, the Emancipation Proclamation, ended slavery but did not directly address civil rights activism. Option D, the Great Migration, reflects a movement for better opportunities but does not specifically illustrate organized efforts to defend civil rights.
Which statement from the passage is an opinion?
- A. "Even so, the success of Levittown depended not only on the efficiency of the Levitt brothers' process but also on the Federal Housing Administration" (paragraph 4)
- B. "Shortly after World War II, many changes led to the development of suburbs." (paragraph 1)
- C. "This, much of the baby-boom generation had well-constructed homes in which to grow up." (paragraph 4)
- D. "With this financing in place, more homes could be built and more veterans could afford to buy them." (paragraph 4)
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
Option C expresses a subjective view about the quality of homes available to the baby-boom generation, indicating an opinion that these homes were "well-constructed." This characterization is not a factual statement and reflects a personal judgment. In contrast, Option A presents a factual statement about the factors contributing to Levittown's success, grounded in historical context. Option B provides a straightforward observation regarding the timeline of suburban development, without personal interpretation. Option D outlines a factual cause-and-effect relationship regarding financing and home construction, remaining objective. Thus, only Option C conveys a personal opinion.
Option C expresses a subjective view about the quality of homes available to the baby-boom generation, indicating an opinion that these homes were "well-constructed." This characterization is not a factual statement and reflects a personal judgment. In contrast, Option A presents a factual statement about the factors contributing to Levittown's success, grounded in historical context. Option B provides a straightforward observation regarding the timeline of suburban development, without personal interpretation. Option D outlines a factual cause-and-effect relationship regarding financing and home construction, remaining objective. Thus, only Option C conveys a personal opinion.
According to this information, which philosopher would most likely support the presidential power to appoint federal judges with the consent of the U.S. Senate?
- A. Thomas Hobbes
- B. Baron de Montesquieu
- C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- D. John Locke
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.