This excerpt is from a 1987 speech by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall.
"I do not believe that the meaning of the Constitution was forever "fixed" at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the Framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government, and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, we hold as fundamental today. When contemporary Americans cite "The Constitution," they invoke concept that is vastly different from what the Framers barely began to construct two centurie ago... When the Founding Fathers used this phrase [We, the People) in 1787, they did not have in mind the majority of America's citizens. "We the People" included, in the words of the Framers, "the whole Number of free Persons."
This excerpt is from a 1987 speech by President Ronald Reagan.
“In a very real sense, it was then, in 1787, that the Revolution truly began. For it was with the writing of our Constitution, setting down the architecture of democratic government, that the noble sentiments and brave rhetoric of 1776 took on substance....
All men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights-until that moment some might have said that was just a high-blown sentiment, the dreams of a few philosophers and their hot-headed followers. But could one really construct a government, run a country, with such idealistic notions? But once those ideals took root in living, functioning institutions, once those notions became a nation-well, then, as I said, the revolution could really begin, not just in America but around the world, a revolution to free man from tyranny of every sort and secure his freedom the only way possible in this world, through the checks and balances and institutions of limited, democratic government.â€
Which statement from the excerpts provides evidence for the Inference that minority rights were not protected by the U.S. government as originally founded?
- A. "To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government, and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, we hold as fundamental today."
- B. "In a very real sense, it was then, in 1787, that the Revolution truly began."
- C. "I do not believe that the meaning of the Constitution was forever 'fixed' at the Philadelphia Convention."
- D. "For it was with the writing of our Constitution, setting down the architecture of democratic government, that the noble sentiments and brave rhetoric of 1776 took on substance......"
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.
Option A highlights the inherent flaws in the original government structure, indicating that it required significant amendments and a civil war to address fundamental issues, including the protection of minority rights. This suggests that, from its inception, the government did not adequately safeguard these rights. Options B, C, and D, while relevant to the historical context, do not specifically address the inadequacies of minority rights protection. B focuses on the ongoing nature of the Revolution, C discusses the evolving interpretation of the Constitution, and D emphasizes the establishment of democratic principles without mentioning the lack of protections for minority rights.
Other Related Questions
Which feature of the U.S. system of government did de Tocqueville believe might cause conflict in society?
- A. The majority is able to achieve special rights.
- B. The minority is able to block popular legislation.
- C. Legislators must represent minority interests.
- D. Legislators sometimes act against majority rule.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: A
De Tocqueville observed that when the majority in a democracy can impose its will, it might lead to the oppression of minority groups, creating societal conflict. This reflects his concern about "tyranny of the majority," where the dominant group's interests overshadow the rights of others. Option B is incorrect because while minorities can influence legislation, de Tocqueville focused more on majority power. Option C misrepresents his views; he acknowledged the importance of minority representation but did not see it as a source of conflict. Option D is also inaccurate, as de Tocqueville emphasized the potential for the majority to dominate rather than legislators opposing the majority.
De Tocqueville observed that when the majority in a democracy can impose its will, it might lead to the oppression of minority groups, creating societal conflict. This reflects his concern about "tyranny of the majority," where the dominant group's interests overshadow the rights of others. Option B is incorrect because while minorities can influence legislation, de Tocqueville focused more on majority power. Option C misrepresents his views; he acknowledged the importance of minority representation but did not see it as a source of conflict. Option D is also inaccurate, as de Tocqueville emphasized the potential for the majority to dominate rather than legislators opposing the majority.
Based on the excerpts, which speaker would agree with each statement below? Drag each statement into the box labeled with that speaker's name. If neither would agree with a statement, drag it to the box labeled "Neither."
- A. Congress should spend money public education.
- B. Schools should meet federal education guidelines.
- C. Parents should hold public schools accountable.
- D. Local districts should set school guidelines.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer:
Speaker A likely supports the idea that Congress should spend money on public education, as this aligns with a belief in federal investment in education for equitable access. Speaker B would agree that schools should meet federal education guidelines, as this emphasizes the importance of uniform standards for educational quality and accountability. Speaker C advocates for parental accountability in public schools, reflecting the belief that parents play a vital role in monitoring and improving educational outcomes. Speaker D likely supports the idea that local districts should set school guidelines, as this allows for tailored approaches that reflect community needs and values. If neither speaker aligns with a statement, it belongs in the "Neither" category.
Speaker A likely supports the idea that Congress should spend money on public education, as this aligns with a belief in federal investment in education for equitable access. Speaker B would agree that schools should meet federal education guidelines, as this emphasizes the importance of uniform standards for educational quality and accountability. Speaker C advocates for parental accountability in public schools, reflecting the belief that parents play a vital role in monitoring and improving educational outcomes. Speaker D likely supports the idea that local districts should set school guidelines, as this allows for tailored approaches that reflect community needs and values. If neither speaker aligns with a statement, it belongs in the "Neither" category.
Which statement best describes the action of the people in the photograph?
- A. They are utilizing an 8th Amendment right to secure the release of a colleague who was jailed unfairly.
- B. They are utilizing a 6th Amendment right to secure a fair trial for a jailed associate.
- C. They are utilizing a 1st Amendment right to secure equality under the law.
- D. They are utilizing a 14th Amendment right to secure the opportunity to vote in federal elections.
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: C
The action depicted in the photograph aligns with the 1st Amendment, which guarantees freedoms concerning speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government. The individuals are likely advocating for equality under the law, a fundamental principle of democratic society. Option A incorrectly references the 8th Amendment, which focuses on protection against excessive bail and cruel punishment, not the right to protest for a colleague's release. Option B misapplies the 6th Amendment, which ensures the right to a fair trial, rather than addressing broader issues of equality. Option D inaccurately connects the situation to the 14th Amendment, which deals with citizenship rights and equal protection, not specifically voting rights.
The action depicted in the photograph aligns with the 1st Amendment, which guarantees freedoms concerning speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government. The individuals are likely advocating for equality under the law, a fundamental principle of democratic society. Option A incorrectly references the 8th Amendment, which focuses on protection against excessive bail and cruel punishment, not the right to protest for a colleague's release. Option B misapplies the 6th Amendment, which ensures the right to a fair trial, rather than addressing broader issues of equality. Option D inaccurately connects the situation to the 14th Amendment, which deals with citizenship rights and equal protection, not specifically voting rights.
According to this information, which philosopher would most likely support the presidential power to appoint federal judges with the consent of the U.S. Senate?
- A. Thomas Hobbes
- B. Baron de Montesquieu
- C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- D. John Locke
Correct Answer & Rationale
Correct Answer: B
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.
Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers within government, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. His support for a collaborative process in appointing judges aligns with the presidential power requiring Senate consent, ensuring that no single branch holds excessive authority. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, favored a strong central authority and would likely support concentrated power without the need for Senate approval. Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the general will and popular sovereignty, which does not directly address the judicial appointment process. John Locke valued consent and governance but did not specifically advocate for the Senate's role in judicial appointments.